| Name / Designation | Hwasong-16B |
| Type / Role | Hypersonic-capable Ballistic Missile |
| Country of Origin | North Korea |
| Manufacturer | Academy of Defense Sciences |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | Revealed publicly in early 2020s |
| Operational Status | Limited/Developmental |
| Range | Estimated long-range class (exact unknown) |
| Speed | Hypersonic (Mach 5+) |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | High-altitude re-entry trajectory |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Unknown |
| Warhead Type | Conventional or nuclear-capable |
| Guidance System | INS + potential terminal sensors |
| Targeting Mode | Ballistic + Hypersonic Glide |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Road-mobile TEL |
| Seeker Type | Unconfirmed |
| Length | Estimated large ICBM-class |
| Diameter | Unknown |
| Wingspan | None / HGV design |
| Launch Weight | Likely heavy-class missile |
| Propulsion | Multi-stage solid or liquid-fuel (unconfirmed) |
| Warhead Weight | Not disclosed |
| Explosive Type | HE / Nuclear-capable |
| Detonation Mechanism | Likely impact or airburst |
| Payload Options | Nuclear / Conventional |
| Operational Range Type | Long-range |
| Deployment Platform | Ground-based TEL |
| Target Types | Strategic land-based targets |
| Combat Proven | No |
| Users / Operators | North Korea |
The Hwasong-16B represents one of the most advanced missile developments publicly revealed by North Korea, signaling a shift toward hypersonic glide technologies and maneuverable re-entry vehicles intended to complicate regional missile-defense systems. First showcased during a major military parade, the missile is assessed by defense analysts as part of Pyongyang’s ongoing effort to expand its long-range, precision-strike portfolio.
Manufactured by North Korea’s Academy of Defense Sciences, the Hwasong-16B is believed to be a derivative of the Hwasong intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) family, but optimized for enhanced maneuverability during terminal flight. While exact specifications remain undisclosed, available imagery and state media claims suggest the system incorporates a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV), enabling unpredictable flight paths that can challenge radar tracking.
Designed for strategic deterrence, the Hwasong-16B’s estimated range—based on size and configuration—could potentially extend thousands of kilometers, fitting within North Korea’s long-range missile doctrine. Its hypersonic glide stage is expected to reach speeds exceeding Mach 5, allowing rapid engagement capability and reduced interception opportunities. The missile is likely road-mobile, using a large transporter-erector-launcher (TEL), enabling flexible deployment and reduced vulnerability to pre-emptive strikes.
In terms of payload, the system is believed to be dual-capable, accommodating either conventional or nuclear warheads depending on mission requirements. Its guidance is assumed to combine inertial navigation with updated terminal maneuvering sensors to maintain accuracy despite high-speed flight.
For defense observers and U.S. military planners, the Hwasong-16B highlights the rapid progression of North Korean missile-defense evasion technologies. The system’s introduction increases strategic complexity across Northeast Asia, especially concerning early-warning timelines and missile-intercept planning.
As the Hwasong-16B Hypersonic Ballistic Missile is a North Korean strategic missile, it is not commercially available, and no official price exists. Costs cannot be determined due to the classified nature of the program and its status as a state-produced strategic weapon.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More