| Name | Douglas F-4 Phantom II |
| Manufacturer | McDonnell Aircraft / McDonnell Douglas |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Multirole fighter / interceptor / strike aircraft |
| Generation | 3rd Generation |
| Status | Retired in U.S.; active in select foreign air forces |
| First Flight | 1958 |
| Introduction / In Service Since | 1960 |
| Number Built | 5,195 |
| Operators | U.S., Israel, Germany (ret.), Japan, Iran, South Korea, Turkey, Greece (ret.) |
| Length | 63 ft (19.2 m) |
| Wingspan | 38 ft 5 in (11.7 m) |
| Height | 16 ft 6 in (5 m) |
| Wing Area | 530 sq ft |
| Empty Weight | 30,328 lb |
| Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) | 61,795 lb |
| Internal Weapons Bay | None |
| External Hardpoints | 9 |
| Maximum Speed | Mach 2.23 |
| Range | 1,750 miles |
| Combat Radius | ~420 miles |
| Service Ceiling | 60,000 ft |
| Rate of Climb | 41,300 ft/min |
| Thrust-to-Weight Ratio | ~0.86 |
| G Limits | +7.33 |
| Engine Type | GE J79-GE-17 turbojets |
| No. of Engines | 2 |
| Thrust (each) | 17,900 lbf with afterburner |
| Thrust Vectoring | No |
| Fuel Capacity | ~1,994 gallons internal |
| Gun | 20mm M61 Vulcan (later variants) |
| Missiles (Air-to-Air) | AIM-7 Sparrow, AIM-9 Sidewinder |
| Missiles (Air-to-Ground) | AGM-65, AGM-45, AGM-78 |
| Bombs | Laser-guided, unguided, cluster munitions |
| Hardpoints | 9 |
| Payload Capacity | Up to 18,000 lb |
| Radar | AN/APQ-50/72/120 variants |
| Radar Range | 90–100 km |
| Electronic Warfare (EW) System | RWR, ECM pods |
| Targeting System | External pods (later upgrades) |
| Helmet Display | No |
| Navigation | INS, TACAN |
| Autopilot / AI Assistance | Basic autopilot |
| Communication | UHF/VH |
| Radar Cross Section (RCS) | High |
| Stealth Features | None |
| Infrared Signature Reduction | Minimal |
| Sensor Fusion | No |
| Networking Capabilities | Limited (upgraded variants only) |
| Special Export Versions | F-4EJ (Japan), Kurnass 2000 (Israel) |
| Major Conflicts / Deployments | Vietnam War, Arab-Israeli wars, Iran-Iraq War, Gulf War |
| Notable Operators | U.S., Israel, Japan, Turkey |
| Combat Proven? | Yes |
| Mission Types | Air superiority, strike, SEAD, recon |
| Unit Cost | ~$2.4–$3.5 million (1960s) |
| Development Cost | Classified (Cold War era) |
| Program Name | F-4 Phantom Program |
| Funding Countries | United States |
| Upgrades Planned | Avionics and radar upgrades in foreign fleets |
| Future Replacement | Replaced by F-15, F-16, F/A-18 |
| Export Restrictions | Cold War era rules applied |
| Notable Achievements | Over 5,000 built; 2-seat, Mach 2+ milestone |
| Competitors | MiG-21, Mirage III |
The Douglas F-4 Phantom II stands as one of the most iconic and battle-proven American fighter jets of the Cold War era. Introduced in the early 1960s, the F-4 transformed U.S. air power with its unmatched combination of speed, payload, and multirole capability. Initially developed by McDonnell Aircraft (later McDonnell Douglas), the Phantom II served extensively with the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps, becoming a global export success and a dominant force in air combat for over three decades.
Powered by two powerful J79 turbojet engines, the F-4 was capable of reaching Mach 2.23, while carrying an impressive variety of air-to-air missiles, air-to-ground weapons, and reconnaissance systems. Its large radar, two-seat configuration, and high-performance avionics made it a formidable interceptor and strike aircraft well before the digital era.
The Phantom’s hallmark was versatility—able to perform air superiority, close air support, reconnaissance, and suppression-of-enemy-air-defenses (SEAD) missions. During the Vietnam War, it became the backbone of U.S. air operations and later continued serving in the Gulf War with upgraded variants.
Though not a stealth platform, its raw speed, long range, and heavy payload set new standards for fighter design. Modernized F-4 variants remain operational today in several countries, validating its enduring engineering.
The Douglas F-4 Phantom II is no longer in production, but historical U.S. procurement prices ranged from $2.4 million to $3.5 million (1960s dollars) depending on variant—equivalent to tens of millions today when adjusted for inflation. Restored civilian or museum-grade airframes vary widely based on condition and airworthiness.
No. The United States officially retired its F-4 Phantom II fleet in 2016, with the remaining aircraft converted into QF-4 full-scale aerial targets before final retirement. Today, F-4s in the U.S. only appear in museums, private collections, or heritage flights, but none remain in operational military service.
The F-22 Raptor is widely regarded as America’s most feared jet due to its combination of stealth, supercruise, extreme agility, advanced AESA radar, and unmatched air-to-air dominance. Its ability to detect and destroy enemy aircraft long before being detected makes it the world’s premier air-superiority fighter. The F-35 is also considered highly feared for its global networked capabilities and strike versatility.
During the Vietnam War, the United States lost approximately 445 F-4 Phantom II aircraft across Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps operations. Losses included combat shootdowns, operational accidents, and attrition, reflecting the intensity of air combat and the Phantom’s heavy involvement in the conflict.
Yes. Early F-4 variants lacked an internal cannon, relying entirely on missiles, which proved limiting in close-range dogfights. The issue was corrected with the F-4E, which introduced an internal 20mm M61A1 Vulcan cannon in the nose. Later variants and upgrades and many export versions also carried gun pods or internal cannons.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More