| Name / Designation | Avangard Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) |
| Type | Boost‑Glide Hypersonic Strategic Weapon |
| Manufacturer | Votkinsk Machine Building Plant |
| Country of Origin | Russia |
| Role / Purpose | Intercontinental strike and strategic nuclear deterrence |
| Operational Status | In service since 2019 |
| Length | ~5.4 m (estimated) |
| Body Design | Hypersonic wedge‑shaped aerodynamic glider |
| Material | Advanced composite heat‑resistant materials |
| Launch Platform | UR‑100UTTKh, R‑36M2, RS‑28 Sarmat ICBMs |
| Payload Capacity | ~2,000 kg class total vehicle mass |
| Propulsion Type | Boost‑glide (no onboard engine after separation) |
| Speed | Mach 20–27 (some sources claim up to Mach 30) |
| Range | 6,000–10,000 km (intercontinental) |
| Maneuverability | High — performs lateral and vertical evasive maneuvers |
| Flight Profile | Rocket boost → suborbital release → atmospheric hypersonic glide → terminal strike |
| Guidance System | Inertial and astro‑inertial navigation (exact details classified) |
| Terminal Guidance | Likely inertial with atmospheric sensing (unconfirmed) |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Undisclosed / estimated low accuracy due to nuclear payload |
| Counter-Jamming | Plasma sheath, unpredictable trajectory, and hypersonic speed reduce tracking effectiveness |
| Warhead Type | Nuclear or conventional |
| Explosive Yield | Up to ~2 megatons (reported) |
| Penetration Ability | Extremely high—kinetic impact plus warhead yield |
| Thermal Protection | Heat‑resistant composite shielding (1,600–2,000°C survivability) |
| Stealth Features | Low‑trajectory glide, plasma absorption effects during reentry |
| Anti-Interception Ability | Very high—non‑ballistic path and extreme maneuverability defeat missile defenses |
The Avangard Hypersonic Glide Vehicle (HGV) represents one of the most significant shifts in modern strategic deterrence, introducing ultra-high speed maneuvering warheads capable of penetrating traditional missile defense networks. First revealed publicly by Russia in 2018, the system entered limited operational service in 2019, marking a milestone in the global competition for hypersonic capability.
Developed by Russia’s Strategic Missile Forces and produced under the supervision of the state defense industry, Avangard was engineered to ensure a survivable nuclear delivery option against increasingly advanced interceptor systems. Its success story centers on a series of test launches — including a 2018 demonstration — where the vehicle reportedly executed atmospheric maneuvering at hypersonic velocities, reinforcing Russian claims of operability.
The Avangard is mounted atop a silo-launched UR-100NUTTKh (SS-19 Mod 4) ICBM, with future integration planned for the RS-28 Sarmat platform. Once boosted into the upper atmosphere, the glide vehicle detaches and descends while maneuvering at reported speeds exceeding Mach 20. Its range enables intercontinental targeting, while its payload is believed to include a nuclear warhead with an estimated yield ranging between 150 kilotons and 2 megatons.
Designed primarily as a strategic deterrent, Avangard is not a battlefield weapon but a long-range strategic asset. Its maneuverability, unpredictable flight profile, and atmospheric glide characteristics challenge tracking and interception, positioning it as a symbol of Russia’s efforts to offset U.S. missile defense developments. For U.S. defense observers, Avangard remains a benchmark reference in shaping future hypersonic defense strategies.
The Avangard Hypersonic Glide Vehicle System cost remains undisclosed, as it is a classified strategic nuclear asset. However, defense analysts estimate extremely high unit expense due to specialized materials, dedicated launch infrastructure, and limited production scale.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More