| Name / Designation | AGM-183A ARRW |
| Type | Air-launched hypersonic glide vehicle missile |
| Manufacturer | Lockheed Martin |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Role / Purpose | Long-range, rapid strike against high-value, heavily defended targets |
| Operational Status | Developmental / testing; procurement not yet confirmed |
| Length | ~6.7 m (22 ft) |
| Body Design | Wedge-shaped glide vehicle with protective nose-cone (boost-glide design) |
| Material | Composite / heat-resistant materials (typical for HGVs) |
| Launch Platform | B-52H Stratofortress (tested); B-1B Lancer, F-15E/EX (planned) |
| Payload Capacity | Single warhead (kinetic / fragmentation) integrated in glide vehicle |
| Propulsion Type | Solid-fuel rocket booster + unpowered glide vehicle |
| Speed | Mach 5+ baseline; some sources claim up to Mach 20–27 in optimal conditions |
| Range | Approx. 1,600 km (≈1,000 miles) in many sources |
| Maneuverability | Yes — glide-vehicle capable of trajectory adjustments during glide phase |
| Flight Profile | Air-launch at high altitude → booster rocket → separation → unpowered hypersonic glide toward target |
| Guidance System | Not publicly disclosed / unspecified in open sources |
| Terminal Guidance | Not clearly disclosed — booster-glide design suggests likely inertial + possible onboard sensors (unknown) |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Not publicly confirmed |
| Counter-Jamming | Not publicly confirmed — uncertain in open information |
| Warhead Type | Tungsten fragmentation warhead (or kinetic-energy effect) |
| Explosive Yield | Not publicly disclosed — design emphasis on kinetic/fragmentation lethality rather than high-yield nuclear payload |
| Penetration Ability | High kinetic energy + fragmentation warhead aimed at destroying high-value, hardened, or defended targets — precise penetration data not public |
| Thermal Protection | Materials and heat-shielding typical of hypersonic glide vehicles to withstand extreme heating during reentry/glide phase (design-standard) |
| Stealth Features | No public confirmation of low-observable coatings; glide-vehicle design and high-altitude flight may help reduce radar signature indirectly |
| Anti-Interception Ability | High-speed, high-altitude boost-glide trajectory designed to evade current air-defense systems and reduce interception window |
The AGM-183A — also known as ARRW (Air-Launched Rapid Response Weapon) — represents a bold leap in hypersonic strike capability for the U.S. Air Force. Developed by Lockheed Martin, ARRW is engineered to deliver rapid, long-range, high-speed strikes against heavily defended or time-sensitive targets.
ARRW uses a boost-glide design: a solid-fuel rocket booster propels the weapon to hypersonic speeds at high altitude, after which it releases a non-powered glide vehicle that maneuvers toward its target. This architecture makes interception by standard air-defense systems far more difficult than with traditional ballistic or cruise missiles.
Originally intended for deployment from strategic bombers such as the B-52H Stratofortress — and potentially future integration on platforms like the B-1B Lancer or F-15E Strike Eagle — ARRW offers standoff strike capabilities that expand U.S. reach and deterrence.
During testing, ARRW demonstrated successful booster ignition, glide-vehicle separation, and target impact following real-world release — most notably on December 9, 2022, when a full-up weapon completed its flight path and detonated on target. Its glide phase, enabled by hypersonic velocity and maneuverability, is designed to defeat advanced missile defenses.
However, the program has faced significant technical and developmental challenges: multiple test failures, booster-ignition problems, and delays have slowed any path to formal procurement and deployment.
Despite this, renewed interest surfaced in 2025 as the Air Force weighed reviving ARRW — reflecting the continuing strategic need for long-range, high-speed strike weapons in a contested global environment.
The estimated unit cost for ARRW is in the range of US $15–18 million per missile (when produced) according to available public data.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More