


| Name / Designation | YJ-17 |
| Type / Role | Anti-Ship Cruise Missile |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Manufacturer | CASIC |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | Undisclosed / In Development |
| Operational Status | Emerging / Not Confirmed |
| Range | Estimated 250–350 km |
| Speed | High Subsonic / Possible Supersonic Sprint |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | Sea-skimming / Low-altitude flight |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Not publicly available |
| Warhead Type | Penetration / Fragmentation |
| Guidance System | INS, Beidou/GPS-like Nav, Radar/IIR terminal seeker |
| Targeting Mode | Fire-and-Forget |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | Fighters, Frigates, Corvettes, Coastal Launchers |
| Seeker Type | Radar Homing + Imaging Infrared (expected) |
| Length | Estimated 4–5 m |
| Diameter | Approx. 0.3–0.4 m |
| Wingspan | Not disclosed |
| Launch Weight | Estimated 600–800 kg |
| Propulsion | Turbojet or Small Turbofan |
| Warhead Weight | Estimated 150–200 kg |
| Explosive Type | High Explosive / Penetrator |
| Detonation Mechanism | Proximity / Impact Fuse |
| Payload Options | Conventional |
| Operational Range Type | Medium |
| Deployment Platform | Air, Sea, Coastal Batteries |
| Target Types | Warships, Support Vessels |
| Combat Proven | No |
| Users / Operators | China |
The YJ-17 missile is described as one of China’s emerging next-generation anti-ship strike weapons, representing a technological step forward from earlier YJ-series cruise missiles. Developed to strengthen long-range maritime precision strike capabilities, the YJ-17 is positioned as a versatile, high-speed missile for use across naval, air, and ground-based platforms.
Believed to be manufactured by the China Aerospace Science and Industry Corporation (CASIC), the YJ-17 is reportedly designed to fill the gap between traditional subsonic sea-skimming missiles and advanced supersonic anti-ship systems. Its primary mission profile targets surface combatants, high-value maritime assets, and amphibious formations operating at extended ranges.
Open-source assessments suggest that the YJ-17 may feature an integrated guidance package combining INS, satellite navigation, terminal radar homing, and imaging infrared—providing resistance against jamming and enabling precision end-phase maneuvering. While exact figures remain undisclosed, the missile is expected to offer a range potentially between 250–350 km, enabling standoff engagements from a variety of launch platforms including fighter aircraft, naval vessels, and coastal batteries.
A compact aerodynamic frame allows the YJ-17 to fly at high subsonic to potentially low-supersonic speeds, utilizing a sea-skimming flight profile to reduce detection by naval radar systems. Reports also suggest the missile may incorporate a modern multi-stage warhead optimized for penetrating the defensive layers of contemporary destroyers and frigates.
For U.S. defense observers, the YJ-17 reflects China’s continued emphasis on layered anti-ship capabilities designed to challenge naval task forces in contested regions. Its versatility, modern sensor suite, and improved survivability underscore its role within China’s expanding precision strike ecosystem.
As a Chinese-made military system not available for export to the United States, the YJ-17 has no official U.S. market price. Cost estimates remain speculative due to classified development and procurement data.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More