| System Name | HQ-9 / HongQi-9 |
| Manufacturer | CPMIEC / China Academy of Defense Tech |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Type / Role | Long-Range Surface-to-Air Missile System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 1997 |
| Unit Cost | USD 500–700 Million (per Battery) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | 200 km |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | 30 km |
| Target Types | Aircraft, Cruise Missiles, SRBMs, UAVs |
| Interception Probability | 85–90% (under optimal conditions) |
| Reaction Time | 15–20 seconds |
| Radar Detection Range | 250–300 km |
| Missile Type | HT-233 Interceptor |
| Missile Length | 6.8 m |
| Missile Weight | 1300 kg |
| Warhead Type | Fragmentation / Pr |
| Warhead Weight | 180 kg |
| Speed | Mach 4.2 |
| Radar Type | AESA Multi-Function Radar |
| Radar Name | HT-233 |
| Detection Range | 300 km |
| Tracking Capacity | 100+ Targets |
| Guidance System | Command + Active Radar Homing |
| Fire Control System | Integrated Digital Fire |
| Launcher Type | Mobile / Truck-Mounted |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 4 |
| Reload Time | 45–60 minutes |
| Mobility Platform | Taian TA580 8x8 Truck |
| Crew Required | 3–5 personnel |
| C2 System | Integrated Air Defense Network |
| Connectivity | Secure Data Link / Fiber-Optic / Radio |
| Network Capability | Yes (Network-Centric Operations) |
| Operation Mode | Autonomous / Manual / Linked |
| Primary Operator | China, Pakistan, Turkmenistan |
| Combat Proven | Limited Combat Record |
| Conflict History | Deployed in South China Sea, PLA Exercises |
| Notable Feature | Comparable to Patriot & S-300 systems |
Developed by China’s China Academy of Defense Technology (CADT) and produced by the China Precision Machinery Import-Export Corporation (CPMIEC), the HQ-9 is a long-range, all-altitude surface-to-air missile (SAM) system engineered to counter a wide spectrum of airborne threats. Drawing on technology from the Russian S-300 and U.S. Patriot systems, it forms the backbone of China’s People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) integrated air defense network.
The HQ-9 combines a multi-function phased array radar with high-speed interceptor missiles capable of engaging aircraft, cruise missiles, and short-range ballistic targets. Its active radar homing guidance and anti-jamming capabilities provide exceptional accuracy and resilience in electronic warfare environments.
The system’s maximum engagement range reaches 200 km, with an altitude ceiling of 30 km. Each HQ-9 battery includes a command vehicle, fire control radar, and mobile launchers—each carrying up to four missiles. The system can simultaneously track and engage multiple targets, supported by an Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar capable of detecting targets up to 300 km away.
The upgraded HQ-9B and HQ-9C variants feature improved seekers, better electronic counter-countermeasures (ECCM), and network-centric warfare integration, positioning it as a credible counterpart to Western systems like the Patriot PAC-3.
Although the HQ-9 is not exported to the U.S., its estimated international unit cost per battery ranges from USD 500 million to 700 million, depending on configuration and variant. Comparable U.S. systems like the Patriot PAC-3 cost about USD 1 billion per battery.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More