| System Name | Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) |
| Manufacturer | Boeing (Lead), Raytheon, Northrop Grumman |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| Type / Role | Strategic Missile Defense System |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 2004 |
| Unit Cost | USD 75–85M per Interceptor (Est.) |
| Maximum Engagement Range | Intercepts ICBMs midcourse |
| Maximum Engagement Altitude | Exo-atmospheric space intercept |
| Target Types | ICBMs, RVs, decoys |
| Interception Probability | Classified / Improved in recent tests |
| Reaction Time | Seconds (automated C2) |
| Radar Detection Range | 2,000–4,000+ km (combined network) |
| Missile Type | Ground-Based Interceptor (GBI) |
| Missile Length | 16.6 m |
| Missile Weight | ~12,700 kg |
| Warhead Type | Kinetic Kill Vehicle (EKV) |
| Warhead Weight | N/A (hit-to-kill) |
| Speed | Up to Mach 20 |
| Radar Type | Phased Array / X-Band |
| Radar Name | SBX, UEWR, AN/TPY-2 |
| Detection Range | 2,000–4,000+ km |
| Tracking Capacity | Hundreds of objects |
| Guidance System | Hit-to-Kill + Midcourse Guidance |
| Fire Control System | Command Launch and Control (CLC) |
| Launcher Type | Underground Silo |
| No. of Missiles per Launcher | 1 |
| Reload Time | Several hours / mission dependent |
| Mobility Platform | Fixed installations |
| Crew Required | Highly automated; small crews |
| C2 System | GMD Fire Control (GFC) |
| Connectivity | SATCOM / Fiber / Secure Links |
| Network Capability | Fully integrated with MDA architecture |
| Operation Mode | Autonomous / Networked |
| Primary Operator | United States |
| Combat Proven | Not used in combat |
| Conflict History | N/A (deterrence role) |
| Notable Feature | Only U.S. homeland ICBM defense |
The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense (GMD) system is the United States’ primary homeland defense shield designed to intercept and destroy incoming intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in space. Developed by Boeing as the lead contractor, with major contributions from Raytheon, Northrop Grumman, and Lockheed Martin, GMD represents one of the most complex and technologically advanced missile defense architectures ever fielded. Operational under the U.S. Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and U.S. Northern Command, the system provides 24/7 protection against long-range missile attacks targeting the U.S. mainland.
GMD’s core mission is to defeat ICBMs during the midcourse phase, where the warhead travels through the vacuum of space. The system employs Ground-Based Interceptors (GBIs) located at Fort Greely, Alaska, and Vandenberg Space Force Base, California. Each interceptor carries an Exoatmospheric Kill Vehicle (EKV) designed to destroy targets through kinetic hit-to-kill impact at closing speeds above Mach 20.
Supported by a global sensor network—including Sea-Based X-Band Radar (SBX), Upgraded Early Warning Radars (UEWR), and space-based infrared systems—GMD integrates layered tracking data to accurately discriminate real warheads from decoys. Its command-and-control backbone, the Command Launch and Control (CLC) system, enables rapid battle management and multi-node coordination.
Although limited in number, GMD provides the only operational U.S. defense against rogue-state ICBM threats. Ongoing modernization, including the upcoming Next-Generation Interceptor (NGI) program, aims to improve reliability, discrimination, and multi-kill capabilities.
The Ground-Based Midcourse Defense system has an estimated cost of USD 75–85 million per Ground-Based Interceptor, while full site infrastructure costs run into the billions due to radars, silos, command networks, and operational support. Exact pricing varies by configuration and modernization packages.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More