Home
Catalog
Compare
Su-57 vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Stealth vs Speed

Su-57 vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Stealth vs Speed

The Su-57 Felon and the F-16 Fighting Falcon represent two distinct generations of air combat philosophy. Russia’s Sukhoi Su-57, a fifth-generation stealth fighter, aims to rival the world’s most advanced aircraft with cutting-edge radar evasion, supermaneuvrability, and next-gen avionics. In contrast, the U.S.-made F-16 Fighting Falcon, a fourth-generation multirole jet developed by Lockheed Martin, has remained a global combat workhorse since the 1970s. While the Su-57 emphasizes stealth and advanced sensors, the F-16 relies on speed, agility, and a proven combat record. Comparing these two highlights the technological evolution and tactical diversity shaping modern air warfare.

Performance Verdict

The Su-57 and F-16 cater to vastly different combat doctrines. The Su-57 is Russia’s ambitious leap into fifth-generation air combat, combining stealth design, internal weapons carriage, and super cruise capability. It’s engineered to dominate in contested environments against high-tech adversaries like the F-22 or F-35. However, its operational numbers remain limited, and production challenges hinder its full deployment.

The F-16, on the other hand, thrives on reliability and versatility. With over 4,600 units built and active service in more than 25 nations, it has decades of combat experience and continuous modernization under the F-16V variant. Though it lacks stealth, its agility, affordability, and upgraded AESA radar keep it relevant in today’s skies.

In a head-to-head, the Su-57 holds the technological edge in stealth and sensor fusion, but the F-16 remains the more proven and widely trusted platform — a testament to enduring design excellence.

	SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter F-16 Fighting Falcon Fighter Jet

Price
Our Rating	8.0 8.0
Manufacturer	Sukhoi Lockheed Martin
Category	Fighter Jets Fighter Jets

General Information

Name	Su-57 Felon F-16 Fighting Falcon
Manufacturer	Sukhoi (UAC) General Dynamics / Lockheed Martin
Country of Origin	Russia United States
Type / Role	Stealth Air Superiority / Multirole Fighter Multirole Fighter
Generation	Fifth 4th
Status	In limited service Active / In Service
First Flight	January 29, 2010 January 20, 1974
Introduction / In Service Since	2020 1978
Number Built	~25 (as of 2025) Over 4,600
Operators	Russian Aerospace Forces USA, Israel, Turkey, Greece, South Korea, etc.

Dimensions & Structure

Length	20.1 m 49 ft 5 in (15.06 m)
Wingspan	14.1 m 32 ft 8 in (9.96 m)
Height	4.6 m 16 ft 8 in (5.09 m)
Wing Area	78.8 m² 300 sq ft (27.87 m²)
Empty Weight	~18,000 kg 18,900 lb (8,573 kg)
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW)	35,000 kg 42,300 lb (19,187 kg)
Internal Weapons Bay	Yes (2 main, 2 side) None
External Hardpoints	6 9

Performance

Maximum Speed	Mach 2.0 Mach 2.0
Range	3,500 km 2,620 mi (4,220 km) with drop tanks
Combat Radius	1,500 km ~500 mi (800 km)
Service Ceiling	20,000 m 50,000 ft (15,240 m)
Rate of Climb	330 m/s 50,000 ft/min
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio	~1.15 1.095
G Limits	+9 +9 / -3

Powerplant

Engine Type	Saturn AL-41F1 (future Izdeliye 30) Pratt & Whitney F100-PW-229 / GE F110-GE-129
No. of Engines	2 1
Thrust (each)	142 kN with afterburner 29,000 lbf (afterburner)
Thrust Vectoring	Yes (3D) No
Fuel Capacity	~10,300 kg 7,000 lb internal

Armament

Gun	30mm GSh-30-1 cannon 1× M61A1 20mm Vulcan
Missiles (Air-to-Air)	R-77, R-74M, R-37M AIM-9, AIM-120
Missiles (Air-to-Ground)	Kh-38, Kh-59MK2 AGM-65, AGM-88
Bombs	KAB-250/500 guided bombs JDAM, Paveway, Cluster bombs
Hardpoints	10 (internal + external) 9
Payload Capacity	10,000 kg 17,000 lb (7,700 kg)

Avionics & Systems

Radar	N036 Byelka AESA AN/APG-68 / AN/APG-83 AESA
Radar Range	400+ km ~160 km
Electronic Warfare (EW) System	L402 Himalayas suite AN/ALQ-213, ALQ-131
Targeting System	IRST + radar fusion Sniper XR / LANTIRN
Helmet Display	Integrated HMS JHMCS
Navigation	GLONASS-based INS GPS/INS
Autopilot / AI Assistance	Partial autonomy Digital Fly-by-Wire
Communication	Encrypted data link Link 16, Secure UHF/VHF

Stealth & Technology

Radar Cross Section (RCS)	Estimated 0.3–0.5 m² ~1.2 m²
Stealth Features	Internal bays, radar-absorbing composites Limited shaping, radar-absorbent coatings
Infrared Signature Reduction	Engine shielding, cooling design Moderate
Sensor Fusion	Multi-source integration Partial (F-16V upgrade)
Networking Capabilities	Limited data-link interoperability Link 16, Joint operations compatible

Variants

Special Export Versions

Su-57E (Export Variant) F-16I (Israel), KF-16 (South Korea)

Operational History

Major Conflicts / Deployments	Syria (testing), Ukraine (limited combat) Gulf War, Kosovo, Iraq, Afghanistan
Notable Operators	Russia USAF, Israel, Turkey, Taiwan, UAE
Combat Proven?	Limited Yes
Mission Types	Air superiority, strike, reconnaissance Air superiority, strike, SEAD, CAS

Cost & Program

Unit Cost	~$45–50 million (estimated) ~$35 million (Block 70)
Development Cost	~$10 billion (PAK FA program) ~$8 billion (program total)
Program Name	PAK FA (T-50) Lightweight Fighter (LWF)
Funding Countries	Russia United States, NATO partners

Additional Information

Upgrades Planned	New radar, Izdeliye 30 engines AESA radar, datalink, EW suite
Future Replacement	None planned (Su-57M modernization) F-35A Lightning II
Export Restrictions	Controlled by Russian government Controlled under ITAR
Notable Achievements	Russia’s first fifth-gen stealth jet Most exported Western fighter
Competitors	F-22 Raptor, F-35 Lightning II, J-20 Mighty Dragon JAS 39 Gripen, MiG-29, Mirage 2000

Disclaimer Note

The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data. TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content. We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content. External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.