




| System Name | Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer |
| Type / Role | Guided missile destroyer |
| Manufacturer | Bath Iron Works, Huntington Ingalls Industries |
| Country of Origin | United States |
| In Service | Yes |
| Year Introduced | 1991 |
| Unit Cost | 1.8 to 2.2 billion USD |
| Crew | Around 300 personnel |
| Length | 155 meters |
| Beam (Width) | 20 meters |
| Draft | 9.3 meters |
| Displacement | Up to 9,200 tons |
| Hull Material | Steel |
| Deck Configuration | Flush deck design |
| Propulsion Type | Gas turbine |
| Engine Model | 4 × General Electric LM2500 |
| Power Output | Approx 100,000 shaft horsepower |
| Maximum Speed | 30 plus knots |
| Range | About 4,400 nautical miles |
| Endurance | Several months at sea |
| Primary Radar | AN SPY 1 or AN SPY 6 (Flight III) |
| Radar Range | 300 plus km (air targets) |
| Sonar System | Hull mounted sonar and towed array |
| Electro-Optical / IR System | Yes |
| Electronic Warfare Suite | AN SLQ 32 |
| Fire Control Radar | Mk 99 |
| Main Gun | 5 inch Mk 45 naval gun |
| Vertical Launch System (VLS) Cells | 90 to 96 Mk 41 cells |
| Missiles | SM 2, SM 3, SM 6, Tomahawk |
| Anti-Ship Missiles | Harpoon or Naval Strike Missile |
| Anti-Submarine Torpedoes | Mk 46 or Mk 54 |
| Close-In Weapon System (CIWS) | Phalanx CIWS or SeaRAM |
| Decoy Systems | Chaff and flare launchers |
| Helicopter Capability | Yes |
| Hangar Capacity | Two MH 60R helicopters |
| UAV Operations | Limited |
| Flight Deck Size | Full size flight deck |
| Replenishment at Sea | Supported |
| Countermeasures | Chaff, flares |
| ECM / ECCM | Integrated electronic warfare systems |
| Missile Defense System | Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense |
| Combat Management System | Aegis Combat System |
| Communication Systems | Secure U.S. Navy data links |
| Service Branch | United States Navy |
| Primary Operator | United States |
| Operational History | Global combat and patrol deployments |
| Notable Feature | Aegis missile and air defense capability |
The Arleigh Burke class destroyer is the backbone of the modern U.S. Navy surface fleet. Designed for high intensity naval warfare, it combines air defense, missile strike, and anti submarine warfare in a single platform. Since entering service in the early 1990s, the class has remained central to U.S. maritime power projection.
Built by Bath Iron Works and Huntington Ingalls Industries, the Arleigh Burke class was developed to counter advanced air and missile threats during the late Cold War. Its primary role is multi mission surface combat operations, including fleet air defense, sea control, and land attack.
The destroyer is powered by four gas turbine engines, allowing speeds above 30 knots and long range endurance. Its core capability is the Aegis Combat System, paired with the SPY 1 phased array radar, enabling simultaneous tracking and engagement of multiple air and missile targets. Later Flight IIA and Flight III variants add improved missile defense and sensor performance.
Armament is centered on the Mk 41 Vertical Launch System, carrying Tomahawk land attack missiles, Standard surface to air missiles, and ASROC anti submarine weapons. A five inch naval gun supports surface and shore fire missions, while CIWS and SeaRAM provide close range defense.
Arleigh Burke class destroyers operate worldwide with the U.S. Navy, supporting carrier strike groups, ballistic missile defense patrols, and independent deployments. They have seen combat use in the Middle East, Pacific, and European theaters, launching precision strikes and providing air defense for allied forces.
The unit cost of an Arleigh Burke class destroyer varies by flight and configuration. Recent Flight III ships are estimated at around 1.8 to 2.2 billion U.S. dollars per vessel, reflecting advanced radar upgrades and missile defense enhancements.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More