

| Name / Designation | PL‑16 |
| Type / Role | Long‑Range Air‑to‑Air Missile |
| Country of Origin | China |
| Manufacturer | Chinese aerospace industry |
| Service Entry / Year Introduced | Limited entry mid‑2020s (estimated) |
| Operational Status | Emerging / Limited Service |
| Range | Estimated 200–280 km+ |
| Speed | > Mach 4 estimated |
| Ceiling / Altitude Limit | High‑altitude launch advantage |
| Accuracy (CEP) | Not publicly available |
| Warhead Type | High explosive fragmentation (assumed) |
| Guidance System | Active radar seeker (AESA) |
| Targeting Mode | Fire‑and‑forget with mid‑course datalink |
| Launch Platform Compatibility | J‑20, J‑35 internal bays |
| Seeker Type | Active radar homing |
| Length | ~3.8 m estimated |
| Diameter | ~180–203 mm estimated |
| Wingspan | Folding/retractable fins |
| Launch Weight | ~200+ kg estimated |
| Propulsion | Dual‑pulse solid rocket |
| Warhead Weight | Not disclosed |
| Explosive Type | HE fragmentation (assumed) |
| Detonation Mechanism | Proximity/impact fuse (likely) |
| Payload Options | Conventional |
| Operational Range Type | Long |
| Deployment Platform | Air (fighter jets) |
| Target Types | Enemy aircraft, BVR threats |
| Combat Proven | Not publicly confirmed |
| Users / Operators | China (PLAAF) |
The PL‑16 is China’s next‑generation long‑range air‑to‑air missile designed to give its fifth‑generation fighters a reach advantage in beyond‑visual‑range (BVR) combat. Built to fit the internal weapon bays of stealth jets like the Chengdu J‑20 and the naval J‑35, the PL‑16 reflects China’s focus on maximizing internal payload and reducing radar cross‑section in contested airspace.
The PL‑16 is an evolution of the earlier PL‑15, optimized for compact carriage without sacrificing reach. It reportedly enters limited service with the People’s Liberation Army Air Force, though official confirmation remains sparse. It aims to provide fighters with a long‑reach missile that retains high performance while fitting next‑gen stealth aircraft bays.
China’s aerospace industry develops the missile, drawing on insights from the PL‑15 program and modern radar and propulsion tech. It likely uses a dual‑pulse solid rocket motor to balance range and maneuverability.
While exact figures are not officially published, military analysts estimate the PL‑16 can engage targets in excess of 200 kilometers in optimal conditions, with some reports suggesting forward hemisphere reach near 280 kilometers when launched at high altitude. Speeds likely exceed Mach 4, keeping pace with other modern BVR missiles.
China has not disclosed a unit price for the PL‑16. Comparable long‑range air‑to‑air missiles typically cost around one million USD or more, depending on production scale and export arrangements.
The PL‑16 uses an advanced active radar seeker, possibly AESA, enabling accurate target tracking in electronically contested environments. It may also include a two‑way datalink for mid‑course updates, inertial navigation, and satellite corrections.
In service it offers a potent long‑reach option, layered above shorter‑range weapons such as the PL‑10 for short‑range engagements. While combat use has not been documented publicly, its integration with China’s stealth fleet indicates priority for air dominance missions.
Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.
The information provided on TheDefenseWatch.com is for general informational purposes only. While we strive to ensure the accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of our content regarding defense and aerospace products, technologies, and specifications, we cannot guarantee that all information is 100% accurate or up-to-date due to the evolving nature of military technology and classified data.TheDefenseWatch.com does not warrant the reliability, suitability, or availability of the information for any specific purpose. Users are advised to consult official sources, such as manufacturers, government publications, or defense agencies, for precise and verified data before making decisions based on our content.We are not affiliated with any defense manufacturers, governments, or military organizations mentioned. Opinions, reviews, and ratings reflect expert analysis but are subjective and should not be considered endorsements. TheDefenseWatch.com is not responsible for any errors, omissions, or consequences arising from the use of this website’s content.External links are provided for convenience and do not imply endorsement. TheDefenseWatch.com reserves the right to update or modify content without prior notice. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy & Cookies Policy.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More