Reviving Air Superiority: Why the U.S. Air Force Must Prioritize a ‘Super’ F-22 Raptor Upgrade Now

The F-22 Raptor may have taken first flight decades ago, but as the People’s Liberation Army Air Force (PLAAF) accelerates its stealth-fighter production and the U.S. next-generation air-dominance fleet remains years away, the United States Air Force (USAF) finds itself facing a potential air-superiority gap. According to a recent article in the National Security Journal, the optimum path forward is not retirement of the F-22, but an immediate push to transform it into a “Super Raptor” variant—extending its life, modernizing its sensors, weapons and networking, and bridging the time until sixth-generation systems mature.

This article explores why the F-22 Super upgrade has become a strategic imperative, outlines the key upgrade pathways, examines obstacles and counter-arguments, and provides a short context and analysis of what this means for air-power balance into the 2030s.

Why Upgrading the F-22 Makes Strategic Sense

Rising peer-threats demand constant air-dominance

China’s PLAAF is reported to operate approximately 300 stealth combat jets (such as the J-20) and is rapidly pushing ahead with follow-on 5th-generation and 6th-generation programs. In this context, retiring or sidelining the F-22 fleet would leave the USAF reliant on fewer proven platforms at a time when adversary capability is growing—not shrinking.

In short, the “air-dominance” mission set cannot be taken for granted. The F-22 remains one of the few platforms capable of executing the “first-shot, first-kill” doctrine in contested airspace thanks to its stealth, high thrust-to-weight ratio, and internal weapons bay design.

Production constraints and timing of next-gen fighters

The USAF is deja-vu: the next-gen fighter (under the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) umbrella) will take years to achieve mass production. Meanwhile, the F-22 production line is closed, meaning building new airframes is not an option. Upgrading existing frames is far faster and more cost-effective.

Thus, the F-22 Super pathway becomes more than an option—it becomes a necessity to maintain credible air superiority while waiting for the 6th-generation leap.

Proven platform, vast upgrade potential

The F-22 airframe is not static: over the years it has undergone software, sensors, coatings and weapons updates—so much so that it is arguably a very different aircraft today than the one that first entered service.

Upgrading it further—with modern sensor-fusion, AI-enabled targeting, advanced electronic warfare, hypersonic and directed-energy weapons—makes strategic sense. It leverages continuity (training, logistics, maintainers) rather than starting from scratch.

What a “Super” F-22 Upgrade Would Entail

Networked avionics and sensor fusion

A core upgrade path involves giving the F-22 an enhanced integrated sensor suite, AI-driven data processing, and two-way communications/battle-management links—particularly with the F-35 Lightning II. According to the National Security Journal article, the F-22 already serves as an “aerial quarterback” connecting intelligence, targeting and strike elements.

A “Super” version would further that role, seamlessly tying into a networked force of manned and unmanned platforms.

Weapons and stealth enhancements

The planned integration of next-generation air-to-air weapons such as the AIM-260 Joint Advanced Tactical Missile, and possibly hypersonic missile options (e.g., the USAF’s MAKO air‑launched hypersonic missile) is central to the Super Raptor concept.

In tandem, upgrades to coatings, radar-absorbent materials and signature control will keep the platform stealth-relevant in increasingly contested electromagnetic environments.

Rapid deployment and global reach

Past USAF initiatives like “Rapid Raptor” focused on deploying F-22s globally within 24 hours. A Super Raptor variant would build upon this, leveraging modern logistics, forward-basing, and support to ensure readiness in high-threat theaters.

Extended service life

Rather than phasing out the F-22 in the near term, the Super concept envisions flying the type into the 2050s, acting as a credible dominant air-superiority platform while next-gen squadrons scale up.

Challenges and Counter-Arguments

Cost and opportunity‐cost

Upgrading the fleet is not free. Critics argue that funds poured into an extended F-22 life could divert resources from next-gen programs like NGAD, the F/A-XX (naval) or unmanned systems, thus delaying future capabilities. The National Security Journal acknowledges these concerns.

Platform limitations

Even upgraded, the F-22 retains inherent constraints: closed production line (so no expansion of fleet size), limited combat radius (which remains a logistical challenge, especially in the Indo-Pacific theatre) and maintenance burdens tied to its stealth skin and internal-weapons design.

How long is “enough”?

Even a Super Raptor variant can only hold the line until next-gen systems arrive; the question remains how much capability gap the USAF is willing to accept, and whether newer threats (e.g., more advanced integrated air-defense systems, hypersonic missiles) will outpace the upgrade.

Context and Implications for Air-Power Balance

Indo-Pacific posture

With China intensifying its naval and air‐force expansion, aircraft like the F-22 Super become critical in reinforcing U.S. deterrence. The ability to field stealthy, networked air-dominance fighters that can tie into allied and unmanned assets is central to the USAF’s posture in the region.

Strategic timeline bridging

The USAF’s plans show a fighter-fleet expansion to meet growing needs: one analysis notes the service is targeting 1,558 jets by 2035, up from roughly 1,271 today. In parallel, next-gen platforms will not reach numbers for years. The Super Raptor bridges this timeline by ensuring that fifth-generation air dominance remains credible while sixth-generation fleets are scaled.

Industrial and sustainment benefits

Modernizing rather than replacing leverages existing sustainment infrastructure, training pipelines and contractor support (primarily Lockheed Martin, with the F-22). It helps maintain the industrial base while newer programs ramp up. It may also reduce risk: mid-life upgrades are more predictable than entirely new airframe development.

Conclusion

In an era of intense great-power competition, the risk is not that the USAF will have too many superior fighters—it’s that it will have too few credible ones in the right place at the right time. The F-22 Raptor remains a formidable air-dominance asset, and transforming it into a “Super” variant offers an intellectually sound, fiscally and strategically responsible way to maintain U.S. air superiority until the next generation of fighters arrives.

The proposed upgrade path—sensor networking, weapons enhancements, stealth maintenance and global rapid deployment—aligns with the evolving threat environment. Nevertheless, challenges remain: delays in NGAD, budget pressures, maintenance burdens and range/logistics constraints must be addressed. On balance, the argument is compelling: the Super Raptor is not just a nice-to-have—it may be indispensable.

By accelerating the F-22 upgrade now, the USAF can buy time, preserve dominance and ensure that the United States remains the benchmark of air-superiority into the 2040s.

FAQs