• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » F-15EX Eagle II Availability Reaches 72.4%, Still Below Air Force Target
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

F-15EX Eagle II Availability Reaches 72.4%, Still Below Air Force Target

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 14, 2026 12:26 pm
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
12 Min Read
F-15EX Eagle II availability
Image: U.S. Air Force.
SHARE

Executive Summary:

The U.S. Air Force’s first 16 F-15EX Eagle II fighters achieved an average materiel availability rate of 72.4% in fiscal 2026, according to a Department of War acquisition report. The result is 12.4 percentage points above the program’s 60% minimum sustainment threshold but 7.6 points below its 80% objective. The finding comes as the Air Force prepares to expand the planned F-15EX fleet to 268 aircraft, making sustainment performance increasingly important as production scales.

F-15EX Eagle II Availability Reaches 72.4%

The F-15EX Eagle II availability rate for the first 16 aircraft averaged 72.4% in fiscal 2026, according to an acquisition report cited in a Sept. 14 report by Defence Industry Europe. The reported performance applies to aircraft EX1 through EX16 and reflects demonstrated performance through Feb. 24, 2026.

Contents
  • F-15EX Eagle II Availability Reaches 72.4%
  • Availability Gap Is 7.6 Percentage Points
  • Why F-15EX Sustainment Matters
  • Air Force Plans a Much Larger F-15EX Fleet
  • F-15EX Has Already Passed Major Operational Milestones
  • Maintenance Is the Largest Sustainment Cost
  • Production Growth Adds Another Sustainment Test
  • F-15EX Is Becoming More Important in the Indo-Pacific
  • What 72.4% Means for the Program
  • F-15EX Expansion Raises the Stakes
    • Bottom Line

The 72.4% figure clears the program’s minimum materiel availability threshold of 60%. However, it remains below the Air Force’s 80% objective established under the program’s acquisition baseline. The acquisition assessment characterized the result as slightly below the objective and reported no formal performance deviation.

That distinction matters. A threshold represents the minimum acceptable performance level, while an objective establishes the level the program is intended to achieve. The early F-15EX fleet therefore met its formal minimum requirement but has not yet demonstrated the higher availability level the Air Force ultimately wants.

F-15EX Eagle II availability
Image: U.S. Air Force.

Availability Gap Is 7.6 Percentage Points

The reported figures put the early F-15EX fleet in a relatively clear position:

- Advertisement -
F-15EX Sustainment MeasureReported Result
Average materiel availability72.4%
Program threshold60%
Program objective80%
Margin above threshold12.4 percentage points
Gap to objective7.6 percentage points
Aircraft coveredEX1 through EX16
Performance dateFeb. 24, 2026

The most important point is that 72.4% should not be interpreted as a failure of the aircraft to meet its acquisition requirement. The reported rate is above the established threshold.

The more significant issue is whether the Air Force can improve availability as the fleet grows from a small initial population into a much larger operational force.

Why F-15EX Sustainment Matters

Materiel availability measures whether an aircraft is available for its intended mission rather than simply counting how many aircraft have been delivered.

For a fighter fleet, that distinction is important. An aircraft can be physically present in the inventory but unavailable because it is undergoing scheduled maintenance, awaiting parts, receiving repairs or otherwise unavailable for operational use.

  • F-15EX Eagle II Fighter

    F-15EX Eagle II Fighter

    • Generation: 4.5th
    • Maximum Speed: Mach 2.5 class
    • No. of Engines: 2
    • Radar Range: 200 plus miles (estimate)
    • View Details →
    8.0

    The Air Force is now relying on the F-15EX for more than a limited replacement program. The aircraft was initially intended to replace aging F-15C and F-15D fighters, while also complementing fifth-generation aircraft in missions where its payload, range and weapons capacity provide useful additional capacity. The Air Force says the aircraft is designed around a digital backbone, open architecture and advanced electronic warfare capabilities.

    That makes sustainment performance increasingly important as procurement expands.

    Air Force Plans a Much Larger F-15EX Fleet

    The availability result comes at a significant point in the program’s development.

    The Air Force has substantially expanded its planned F-15EX procurement. A fiscal 2027 acquisition report identifies a planned fleet of 268 aircraft, a major increase from earlier procurement plans. Defence Industry Europe reported that 18 aircraft had been delivered as of April 14, 2026.

    The expansion means that sustainment performance demonstrated by the first aircraft will become increasingly important.

    A small early fleet can produce different maintenance dynamics from a mature fleet. As more aircraft enter operational units, the Air Force gains a larger pool of maintainers, spare parts, technical experience and maintenance data. At the same time, the larger fleet creates a much greater demand for engines, components, depot capacity and trained personnel.

    The challenge will be converting a 72.4% early availability result into a consistently higher rate across a much larger operational population.

    F-15EX Has Already Passed Major Operational Milestones

    The availability result should also be viewed alongside the aircraft’s broader acquisition progress.

    The F-15EX completed initial operational test and evaluation and live-fire testing in November 2023. The program subsequently achieved full-rate production approval in June 2024 and initial operational capability in July 2024, according to the acquisition reporting cited by Defence Industry Europe.

    The Air Force has described the aircraft as a replacement for aging F-15C/D fighters and as a complementary platform to fifth-generation aircraft.

    The service’s operational testing has included air-superiority missions and defensive and offensive counter-air missions. Testing also established a basic air-to-ground capability.

    This is important because availability is only one part of combat capability. A modern fighter must combine mission effectiveness with the ability to generate sorties repeatedly.

    Maintenance Is the Largest Sustainment Cost

    The acquisition assessment also highlights the financial importance of maintaining the F-15EX fleet.

    Annual operating and support costs are estimated at approximately $13.1 million per aircraft in constant fiscal 2020 dollars. Maintenance accounts for the largest portion at about $7.2 million per aircraft, followed by unit operations at roughly $3 million and unit-level manpower at approximately $1.9 million.

    F-15EX Operating and Support CostAnnual Estimate Per Aircraft
    Total operating and support$13.1 million
    Maintenance$7.2 million
    Unit operations$3.0 million
    Unit-level manpower$1.9 million
    Other sustainment and improvementsRemaining balance

    The maintenance figure is particularly relevant to the availability issue because improvements in reliability, parts availability and maintenance turnaround can directly influence the number of aircraft available for operations.

    • F-15EX Eagle II Fighter

      F-15EX Eagle II Fighter

      • Generation: 4.5th
      • Maximum Speed: Mach 2.5 class
      • No. of Engines: 2
      • Radar Range: 200 plus miles (estimate)
      • View Details →
      8.0

      Production Growth Adds Another Sustainment Test

      The Air Force’s F-15EX program is also dealing with production expansion and industrial-base challenges.

      The Air Force previously reported that deliveries resumed after a strike at Boeing’s St. Louis facility disrupted production between August and November 2025. Aircraft 14, 15 and 16 were subsequently delivered to Portland Air National Guard Base.

      The production issue is separate from the 72.4% availability figure, but both point to the same broader challenge: scaling a fighter program requires more than producing airframes.

      The Air Force needs a supporting industrial system capable of supplying engines, avionics, electronic warfare equipment, structural components and other parts at the rate required by an expanding fleet.

      F-15EX Is Becoming More Important in the Indo-Pacific

      The availability question is particularly relevant as the F-15EX moves toward a larger role in the Indo-Pacific.

      The Air Force has been preparing the aircraft for permanent deployment to Kadena Air Base, Japan. In September 2026, the first F-15EX designated for Kadena departed Boeing’s St. Louis facility for Portland, where it was scheduled to receive additional preparation before moving to Japan.

      The Air Force has also used F-15EX deployments to Kadena to familiarize local personnel with the aircraft and validate maintenance, logistics and combat-generation procedures.

      This gives the availability metric greater operational significance. Forward-based fighters must be supported in environments where maintenance capacity, spare parts and transportation can be more constrained than at U.S. bases.

      For the Indo-Pacific, where distances between operating locations can be considerable, aircraft availability directly affects the number of sorties a force can generate over time.

      What 72.4% Means for the Program

      The current result does not indicate that the F-15EX program has failed its sustainment requirement. It indicates that the early fleet has cleared the minimum threshold while still leaving room to improve toward the 80% objective.

      The key question is therefore not whether the first 16 aircraft reached 80%. They did not.

      The more important question is whether the Air Force can improve availability as the fleet matures and expands.

      That will depend on several factors, including maintenance turnaround times, spare-parts availability, supply-chain performance, technical workforce capacity and the maturity of the aircraft’s support infrastructure.

      The program’s future scale makes those factors more important than the performance of a 16-aircraft sample alone.

      F-15EX Expansion Raises the Stakes

      The Air Force’s decision to expand the planned F-15EX fleet makes sustainment a central issue for the program.

      The aircraft offers the service a large, modern weapons platform that can complement F-35 and F-22 aircraft rather than performing exactly the same role. The Air Force has specifically described the F-15EX as a complementary platform for fifth-generation fighters, while its large weapons capacity provides additional options for long-range fires and air operations.

      But a fighter’s value depends on its ability to generate sorties when required.

      For that reason, the 72.4% availability figure is best understood as an early sustainment indicator rather than a verdict on the aircraft. Clearing the 60% threshold is a positive program result, while the 7.6 percentage-point gap to the 80% objective identifies an area the Air Force will need to monitor closely as procurement accelerates.

      The next stages of the F-15EX program will therefore test not only Boeing’s ability to deliver aircraft, but also the Air Force’s ability to sustain a rapidly expanding fleet at the readiness levels expected from a front-line fighter force.

      Bottom Line

      The first 16 F-15EX Eagle II fighters recorded a 72.4% average materiel availability rate in fiscal 2026, exceeding the program’s 60% threshold but falling short of the 80% objective. The result does not represent a formal program failure, but it provides an important early measure of the aircraft’s sustainment performance.

      With the Air Force now planning for a fleet of 268 F-15EX aircraft, improving availability will become increasingly important. The aircraft is moving from an initial fielding phase toward a much larger operational role, including planned deployment to Japan.

      For the F-15EX program, the central sustainment test is now clear: maintain and improve availability while the fleet expands substantially in size and geographic scope.

TAGGED:F-15EX Eagle IIU.S. Air Force
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb
  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker
  • YU-20 Tanker YU-20 Tanker
  • China KJ-500 Aircraft China KJ-500 Aircraft
  • SPY-6 Radar SPY-6 Radar
  • Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft
  • SM-3 Block IB Missile SM-3 Block IB Missile
  • USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier

Recent Compares

  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →
  • F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • US Military Weighs MOAB for Potential Future Strikes on Iran, CNN Reports
  • Saab Wins $120 Million Order for New Gripen Flight Control Computer
  • L3Harris Delivers First VAMPIRE Counter-Drone Systems to U.S. Army
  • Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs
  • Lockheed Martin Taps Avio for ER GMLRS and PrSM Rocket Motor Production

You Might Also Like

chinook helicopter
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Why the Iconic Chinook Helicopter Remains the Ultimate Military Helicopter

September 12, 2026
RAF Stormfighter program
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

RAF Moves To Deploy Stormfighter Collaborative Combat Aircraft As UK Pursues Europe’s First Sixth Generation Air Force

September 8, 2026
MUX TACAIR Collaborative Combat Aircraft
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

U.S. Marine Corps Picks GA-ASI YFQ-42A For MUX TACAIR Collaborative Combat Aircraft Evaluation

February 11, 2026
UK AI drones mine detection
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

UK Races To Deploy AI Drones To Detect Landmines Amid Rising Battlefield Threats

April 3, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?