Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Home » U.S. Quietly Purchased Two Russian-Made Su-27 Flanker Fighters for Adversary Training

U.S. Quietly Purchased Two Russian-Made Su-27 Flanker Fighters for Adversary Training

Acquisition Provided U.S. Pilots Hands-On Exposure to Russian High-Performance Air Superiority Jets

by TeamDefenseWatch
10 comments 4 minutes read
Su-27 Flanker

The United States military discreetly purchased two Russian-made Su-27 Flanker fighters in the mid-2000s to support advanced training and intelligence programs, according to historical procurement disclosures and defense industry sources. The acquisition, carried out through a foreign contractor, enabled U.S. pilots and analysts to study one of Russia’s most widely deployed air superiority fighters under controlled conditions.

Background: Why the Su-27 Flanker Matters

The Su-27 Flanker, developed by the Soviet Union in the late Cold War, was designed as a direct counter to the U.S. F-15 Eagle. With its Mach 2.35 top speed, high-agility aerodynamics, long operational range, and powerful radar suite, the aircraft became a cornerstone of Russian and allied air forces.

Following the collapse of the Soviet Union, several former republics inherited Su-27s. Limited budgets and shifting defense priorities made some of these aircraft available for legal export or refurbishment—creating rare opportunities for Western governments to obtain and evaluate frontline Russian platforms.

For the United States, having access to a real Su-27 Flanker offered significant advantages in understanding the design philosophy, strengths, limitations, and maneuver characteristics of a potential adversary aircraft.

Acquisition Through a Third-Party Contractor

The two Su-27 Flanker fighters were purchased through Tac Air, a private contractor specializing in adversary air support. Reports indicate that the aircraft originated from Ukraine’s surplus stock and were transferred after refurbishment and demilitarization processes aligned with export-control regulations.

While the exact purchase price was never publicly disclosed, defense analysts estimate that foreign-origin Flankers sold on the legal market typically range between $5–$15 million per unit depending on airframe hours and equipment installed.

The aircraft were shipped to a secure U.S. facility where engineers completed airworthiness evaluations and maintenance work prior to flight testing.

Purpose: Evaluation and Aggressor Training

Once in U.S. custody, the Su-27 Flanker fighters played key roles in:

1. Reverse-Engineering and Technical Evaluation

Analysts examined the aircraft’s radar cross-section, avionics architecture, radar performance parameters, and aerodynamic handling. Understanding these systems allowed the U.S. to refine both defensive countermeasures and fighter engagement strategies.

2. Adversary Air (Red Air) Training

Trained contractor pilots flew the Su-27 Flanker in simulated combat missions against U.S. fighters such as the F-15, F-16, and later the F-22 and F-35. First-hand exposure enabled American pilots to understand how the Flanker behaves during high-G maneuvers, low-speed engagements, and beyond-visual-range fights.

These sessions offered insights impossible to replicate through simulators alone.

3. Tactics Development

The Air Force’s Weapons School and intelligence community used data gathered from the aircraft to develop new tactics, techniques, and procedures for countering Russian-designed fighters widely exported to Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.

Expert Perspectives

Defense aviation expert Richard Aboulafia has noted that access to real foreign fighters gives the U.S. “a training and analytical advantage that no simulator or mock-up can replicate.”

Former Air Combat Command officials have similarly stated that assessments of authentic adversary aircraft significantly improve pilot situational understanding during air-to-air engagements.

Additionally, analysts highlight that the widespread global use of the Su-27 Flanker family—including its modern derivatives like the Su-30, Su-33, Su-34, and Su-35—makes direct exposure strategically valuable for the United States.

Strategic Significance

The acquisition reflects a long-standing U.S. practice of obtaining foreign combat aircraft whenever legally and practically feasible. Past examples include MiG-21s from Indonesia, Iraqi MiG-23s, and the well-known secretive “Red Eagles” squadron of the 1980s.

For the Su-27 Flanker, this access became especially relevant as Russia exported advanced variants to countries such as China, India, Vietnam, and Algeria. Understanding the aircraft’s baseline capabilities helped the U.S. anticipate how these fleets might operate in real-world scenarios.

What’s Next?

Although the two original Su-27 Flanker aircraft acquired by the U.S. are no longer believed to be flying, their legacy continues to influence American air combat programs. The rise of contractor-run adversary air units and increasing demand for dissimilar air combat training may prompt future interest in acquiring other foreign-origin platforms, especially as geopolitical tensions rise.

Meanwhile, the widespread deployment of advanced Flanker-family aircraft worldwide ensures that the insights gained from these airframes will remain relevant for years to come.

Su-27 Flanker Fighter Jet – Full Specifications

Su-27 Flanker Fighter Jet

U.S. Quietly Purchased Two Russian-Made Su-27 Flanker Fighters for Adversary Training

Manufacturer: Sukhoi
Category: Fighter Jets
  • Generation 4th Generation
  • Maximum Speed Mach 2.35
  • No. of Engines 2
  • Radar Range 80–100 km

Full Specifications

General Information

Name Su-27 “Flanker”
Manufacturer Sukhoi Design Bureau
Country of Origin Soviet Union (Russia)
Type / Role Air Superiority Fighter
Generation 4th Generation
Status In Service
First Flight May 20, 1977
Introduction / In Service Since 1985
Number Built Over 700
Operators Russia, China, Ukraine, Vietnam, Ethiopia, Indonesia, Belarus

Dimensions & Structure

Length 21.9 m (72 ft)
Wingspan 14.7 m (48 ft)
Height 5.9 m (19 ft)
Wing Area 62 m²
Empty Weight 16,380 kg
Maximum Takeoff Weight (MTOW) 30,450 kg
Internal Weapons Bay None
External Hardpoints 10

Performance

Maximum Speed Mach 2.35 (2,500 km/h)
Range 3,530 km
Combat Radius 1,340 km
Service Ceiling 19,000 m (62,500 ft)
Rate of Climb 325 m/s
Thrust-to-Weight Ratio 1.07
G Limits +9G

Powerplant

Engine Type Saturn AL-31F Turbofan
No. of Engines 2
Thrust (each) 27,500 lbf (122.6 kN)
Thrust Vectoring No (Su-27 base model)
Fuel Capacity 9,400 kg internal

Armament

Gun 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon
Missiles (Air-to-Air) R-27, R-73, R-77
Missiles (Air-to-Ground) Kh-29, Kh-31
Bombs FAB-series general-purp
Hardpoints 10
Payload Capacity 8,000 kg

Avionics & Systems

Radar N001 Myech Pulse-Doppler
Radar Range 80–100 km
Electronic Warfare (EW) System SPO-15 Beryoza RWR
Targeting System IRST & Helmet-Mounted Sight
Helmet Display Yes
Navigation Inertial + GPS
Autopilot / AI Assistance Basic analog system
Communication Secure UHF/VHF

Stealth & Technology

Radar Cross Section (RCS) 10–15 m²
Stealth Features Non
Infrared Signature Reduction Minimal
Sensor Fusion No
Networking Capabilities Limited datalink

Variants

Special Export Versions Su-27SK

Operational History

Major Conflicts / Deployments Ethiopia–Eritrea War, Ukraine conflict
Notable Operators Russia, China, India (as Su-30MK), Ukraine
Combat Proven? Yes
Mission Types Air Superiority, Interception, Escort, Patrol

Cost & Program

Unit Cost $30–40 million USD
Development Cost Classified (Soviet-era)
Program Name PFI Program (Perspective Frontline Fighter)
Funding Countries Soviet Union

Additional Information

Upgrades Planned Radar and avionics modernization
Future Replacement Su-35S, Su-57
Export Restrictions Limited to friendly nations
Notable Achievements Set multiple world records for climb rate
Competitors F-15 Eagle, MiG-29, Rafale

Our Rating

The overall rating is based on review by our experts

8.2
  • Technology 9 / 10
  • Performance 8 / 10
  • Firepower 8 / 10
  • Range & Endurance 8 / 10
  • Reliability & Maintenance 8 / 10

PROS

  1. Exceptional range and endurance
  2. Highly maneuverable airframe
  3. Powerful twin-engine thrust
  4. Proven combat record
  5. Extensive global operator base

CONS

  1. Outdated avionics compared to modern jets
  2. Lacks stealth features
  3. High radar cross-section
  4. Limited multirole capability in base model
  5. Maintenance-intensive

Su-27 Flanker: Russia’s Air Superiority Fighter

Developed by the Soviet Union’s Sukhoi Design Bureau, the Su-27 “Flanker” remains one of the most capable and recognizable fourth-generation fighter jets in the world. Conceived in response to the U.S. F-15 Eagle during the late Cold War, the Su-27 was designed to ensure Soviet air superiority against advanced Western aircraft. Its blend of range, agility, and firepower continues to make it relevant in modern combat environments.

Powered by twin Saturn AL-31F turbofan engines, the Su-27 can reach speeds of Mach 2.35 and altitudes exceeding 57,000 feet. With an operational range of nearly 2,200 miles, it provides the Russian Air Force with deep strike and patrol capabilities. The aircraft’s 30mm GSh-30-1 cannon and up to 10 hardpoints for air-to-air and air-to-ground missiles make it a formidable adversary in both interception and multirole operations.

Avionics on the Su-27 Flanker Fighter Jet include the N001 radar, offering detection ranges of up to 80–100 km against fighter-sized targets. Its infrared search and track (IRST) system and helmet-mounted sight enhance situational awareness and missile cueing. Though lacking stealth, the Su-27’s aerodynamic design and supermaneuverability—achieved through relaxed static stability and powerful thrust vectoring in later variants—make it one of the most agile fighters of its era.

Modernized derivatives such as the Su-30, Su-33, and Su-35 trace their lineage to the original Su-27 platform, underscoring its robust design and long-term adaptability.

Su-27 Flanker Fighter Jet Price in US

The Su-27 Flanker’s estimated unit cost is between $30–40 million USD, depending on configuration and export version. While not operated by the U.S., it is often studied by Western analysts and featured in training simulations for its performance benchmark role against American fighters like the F-15 and F-16.

FAQs – Su-27 Fighter Jet

Is the Su-27 a Flanker?

Yes. The Su-27’s NATO reporting name is “Flanker”. This codename was assigned during the Cold War to identify Soviet aircraft in NATO’s system. The “Flanker” designation applies to the Su-27 and its subsequent derivatives, including the Su-30, Su-33, and Su-35.

Why is the Su-30 called Flanker?

The Su-30 is a direct evolution of the Su-27 airframe, which is why NATO also classifies it under the same “Flanker” family. Although upgraded with modern avionics, radar, and multirole capability, the Su-30 retains much of the Su-27’s aerodynamic structure and design lineage—hence its continued “Flanker” naming convention.

Is the Su-27 better than the F-15?

The Su-27 and F-15 Eagle were designed as counterparts during the Cold War. While the Su-27 offers superior maneuverability, range, and high-altitude performance, the F-15 generally holds an advantage in avionics, radar, and precision-guided weapon integration. In short, the Su-27 excels in agility and endurance, while the F-15 dominates in technology and situational awareness.

What is the most advanced Flanker?

The most advanced “Flanker” variant today is the Su-35S, often dubbed “Flanker-E.” It features thrust-vectoring engines, Irbis-E radar, advanced electronic warfare systems, and partial stealth improvements. The Su-35S represents the peak of Su-27 family evolution before the introduction of Russia’s fifth-generation Su-57.

What generation is the Su-27?

The Su-27 Flanker is a fourth-generation air superiority fighter. It was developed in the 1970s to counter advanced Western fighters like the F-14 and F-15, combining high speed, long range, and agility to maintain Soviet dominance in air-to-air engagements.

Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.

Reviews

  • Be the first to add a Review

    Please post a user review only if you have / had this product.

  • Rate this Product

  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 8
  • 6 / 10 based on your selection

Get real time update about this post category directly on your device, subscribe now.

You may also like

10 comments

China Accelerates Deployment of HQ-20 in Its Expanding Air Defense Network November 16, 2025 - 6:44 am

[…] the September parade when only a ground formation was shown—the new footage underscores that the system is now integrated into active training and operational […]

Reply
Russia's Escalating Drone Production Exposes Critical Gaps in European Air Defense Systems November 17, 2025 - 12:03 pm

[…] drones during a seven-hour aerial engagement, marking the first time alliance forces opened fire on Russian aircraft since the conflict in Ukraine […]

Reply
Ford Class vs Nimitz Class: Key Differences Between U.S. Navy Carriers November 23, 2025 - 6:30 am

[…] is expected to cost less and require less maintenance, and can launch both heavier and lighter aircraft than a steam piston-driven system. This flexibility proves crucial as the Navy integrates new aircraft types, including heavier […]

Reply
US Approves $686 Million F-16 Upgrade for Pakistan Air Force as Tensions with India Persist December 12, 2025 - 12:47 am

[…] cryptographic devices, simulators, spare parts, software updates, publications, and full-motion training systems. Logistical and technical support services are part of the […]

Reply
Australia Awards CAE 10-Year Future Air Mission Training System Contract December 12, 2025 - 12:28 pm

[…] has been modernizing how it trains military aircrew to handle increasingly complex missions and systems. The initiative is part of Project AIR5428 Phase 3, which aims to overhaul air mission training […]

Reply
SBU Long-Range Drones Strike Two Russian Su-27 Jets at Belbek Airfield December 21, 2025 - 8:52 am

[…] SBU’s Telegram post, long-range drones operated by its Alpha Special Operations Center hit two Su-27 aircraft on the ground at Belbek. One was fully loaded and preparing for a combat sortie when it was […]

Reply
Russia Loses 1,040 Soldiers in Ukraine War, Ukrainian Military Reports | TheDefenseWatch.com January 8, 2026 - 9:12 am

[…] personnel casualties, Ukraine’s General Staff reported the destruction or disabling of several Russian systems. These included multiple launch rocket systems used for long-range fires, as well as other […]

Reply
Navy Advances AI-Enabled Autonomy in Collaborative Combat Aircraft Demo | TheDefenseWatch.com January 13, 2026 - 12:16 pm

[…] Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) environment. That setup included a virtual F/A-18 and two simulated adversary aircraft. In the scenario, the virtual F/A-18 served as mission lead, directing the autonomous targets to […]

Reply
US Air Force Awards Advanced Concepts Enterprises 31.4 mMillion Dollar mission Readiness Contract | TheDefenseWatch.com January 20, 2026 - 10:12 pm

[…] Hurlburt Field hosts AFSOC headquarters and multiple flying and support units, making consistent training coordination and aviation management essential to day to day […]

Reply
Indonesia Receives First Rafale Advanced Fighter Jets From France Official Says | TheDefenseWatch.com January 26, 2026 - 6:38 am

[…] The aircraft will join the existing mix of fighters, which includes Sukhoi Su-30s, F-16s, and training aircraft. The enhanced sensor suite and weapons load of the Rafale jets are seen as key upgrades to the […]

Reply

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Accept Read More

Privacy & Cookies Policy