• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » U.S. Selects Damen LST-100 Design for New Marine Corps Medium Landing Ship Fleet
Naval & Maritime

U.S. Selects Damen LST-100 Design for New Marine Corps Medium Landing Ship Fleet

TeamDefenseWatch
Last updated: September 8, 2026 1:40 am
TeamDefenseWatch
Share
2 Min Read
Damen LST-100
SHARE

In a major shift in amphibious capability planning, the United States Navy (USN) and United States Marine Corps (USMC) have formally selected the Dutch-designed Damen LST-100 as the foundational design for the new Medium Landing Ship (LSM) program. The announcement was made by John C. Phelan, Secretary of the Navy, via video on his official social media channel on December 5.

Contents
  • Context: Why the LSM Gap Matters
  • The LST-100: Key Specifications and Capabilities
  • Why the U.S. Navy Chose LST-100
  • Strategic Implications: What LST-100 Means for Future Operations
  • What Comes Next — Timeline and Procurement Path

The decision closes a long-running procurement loop, underscoring a pivot toward proven off-the-shelf designs to meet the Corps’ expeditionary and distributed-operations needs across littoral zones.

Context: Why the LSM Gap Matters

For years, the Marine Corps has operated with a capability gap between large-deck amphibious vessels — like LPDs, LHAs, and LHDs — and small landing craft or connectors. Large ships offer robust force projection but are expensive to operate and ill-suited for high-risk littoral environments where ports may be unavailable. Smaller craft have limited range, payload, and endurance.

The LSM program was conceived to fill this gap: a mid-sized, sea-going landing ship transport tailored for agile deployments, logistical support, and small-unit landings — especially for the dispersed “island-hopping” and forward-basing scenarios envisioned in future Indo-Pacific theaters.

- Advertisement -

Initial attempts to develop a bespoke U.S. design foundered in 2023–2024 as responses to the request for proposals proved too costly and complex. The Navy and Marines then pivoted to evaluating existing designs, seeking a ready-made solution that could be adapted and built quickly.

The LST-100: Key Specifications and Capabilities

The Damen LST-100 brings a mature, proven footprint that aligns well with USMC requirements. According to Damen, the ship is 100 meters long with a beam of 16 meters. It displaces roughly 3,900–4,000 tonnes when fully loaded.

Some of the critical features include:

  • Cargo and personnel transport: Approximately 500 tonnes of vehicles and supplies, with around 1,020 m² of roll-on/roll-off (Ro-Ro) deck space. Enough capacity to move light armored vehicles, logistics equipment, and supplies in support of Marine operations.
  • Amphibious capability: Bow and stern ramps (each rated for loads up to 70 tonnes) allow beaching or port access for direct offload of vehicles, troops, and cargo.
  • Helicopter/small-craft support: An aft flight deck suitable for a medium helicopter (such as an NH-90), and capacity for deploying smaller landing craft via onboard cranes.
  • Endurance and range: The vessel is capable of over 3,400 nautical miles of range — sufficient for long-distance intra-theater repositioning, island-to-island transfers, or extended logistic runs without reliance on major ports.
  • Crew & living spaces: Designed for a core crew (around 18–20) plus berthing for embarked Marines.

With these features, the LST-100 offers a balance of capacity, flexibility, and cost that makes it well suited to modern littoral and distributed maritime operations — a key objective of the LSM program.

Why the U.S. Navy Chose LST-100

According to official statements, the choice of LST-100 reflects a combination of operational fit, fiscal discipline, and schedule realism. In President Phelan’s words, the selection “is operationally driven” and helps deliver capability to the Fleet within a “responsible timeline.”

Instead of pursuing a full new-design development — which previously proved too costly and slow — the Navy and Marines are now opting for a “build-to-print” approach. Under this model, the USN will adapt Damen’s existing 3D design, integrate U.S.-standard systems (survivability, communications, habitability), and then contract out construction to U.S. shipyards.

This reduces technical risk, avoids lengthy R&D phases, and enables procurement of dozens of ships — with a target fleet size of at least 35 vessels — in a relatively short period.

The program is also structured to encourage competition: the Navy will appoint a Vessel Construction Manager (VCM) who will oversee serial production and coordinate between multiple yards.

- Advertisement -

Strategic Implications: What LST-100 Means for Future Operations

The addition of a dedicated medium landing ship fleet transforms USMC amphibious and littoral mobility. In potential contested environments — such as island chains in the Indo-Pacific — LST-100 will allow the Marines to:

  • Insert and sustain forces without relying on major ports or fixed infrastructure.
  • Conduct distributed operations: Multiple small units can be landed and resupplied over dispersed island or coastal locations.
  • Provide logistic & sustainment support over long distances — enabling sustained presence, humanitarian aid, or rapid reinforcement.
  • Enhance flexibility: The mix of vehicle transport, helicopter support, and small-craft handling makes the vessel suitable for a wide variety of missions — from evacuation, disaster relief, humanitarian assistance, to amphibious assault and maritime security.

By prioritizing a smaller, more numerous fleet over a few large-deck amphibs, the Navy is adapting to modern operational demands: contested littorals, anti-access/area-denial (A2/AD) environments, and fast-paced distributed operations.

What Comes Next — Timeline and Procurement Path

With the design selected, the next steps will involve finalizing the U.S.-adapted technical data package and awarding a contract for the lead ship. The Navy expects to begin construction on the first LSM hull once design work is complete and has signaled that multiple shipyards may compete for follow-on production.

If all goes according to plan, the first operational LSM could enter service by the late 2020s, with a full class of 35 ships completed through the early 2030s.

TAGGED:Amphibious WarfareDamen LST-100Marine Corpsnaval procurementU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByTeamDefenseWatch
TeamDefenseWatch is the official editorial byline of TheDefenseWatch.com. Working under one umbrella, TheDefenseWatch.com, the team delivers verified, factual reporting on global defense, military technology, aerospace systems, and security developments. Articles are sourced from official statements, defense industry releases, and trusted media, with editorial review to ensure accuracy and clarity.Contact: info@TheDefenseWtach.com
7 Comments
  • Pingback: BAE Systems Wins $184M USMC Contract to Expand ACV Production, Boosting Marine Amphibious Capabilities | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: Lt. Gen. James H. Adams III Reappointment as DIA Director Announced | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: U.S. Marines AH-1Z Viper Live-Fire Flight Operations Pacific Ready Combat Skills | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: UK Studies Aster 30 Integration for Mk 41 Launchers on Royal Navy Warships | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: BAE Systems Awarded $195M Contract for Advanced Amphibious Combat Vehicles | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: Bangladesh Navy To Receive Former UK Hydrographic Vessel Strengthening Bay Of Bengal Capabilities | TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Pingback: Blue Water Autonomy Launches Liberty Class Autonomous Ship For U.S. Navy Operations | TheDefenseWatch.com

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie
  • Northrop YF-23 Fighter Northrop YF-23 Fighter
  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft
  • Rafale F5 Fighter Rafale F5 Fighter

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Iran Releases Footage of Underground Missile Tunnels Amid Rising US Military Tensions
  • China Says HQ Missile Systems Intercepted Two New Missile Types in PLA Drill
  • Phoenix Defense Ventures Wins $310.5 Million HH-60W Training Contract
  • Rolls-Royce Showcases Naval Engines and Automation Systems at Euronaval 2026
  • North Korea Tests Cruise Missile With Dispersal Warhead, KCNA Says

You Might Also Like

F-35 Lightning II
Aerospace & AviationDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $114.6 Million Contract to Redesign F-35 Navigation Systems

October 24, 2026
US drone boats Iran conflict
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

US Deploys Uncrewed Drone Boats In Conflict With Iran As Maritime Tensions Escalate

March 27, 2026
Aegis Weapon System support contract
Naval & Maritime

Lockheed Martin Wins $99.9M Aegis Weapon System Support Contract

September 9, 2026
Royal Navy Russian vessels tracking
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Royal Navy Expands Maritime Surveillance As Russian Vessels Track Near UK Waters

April 9, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?