• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » US Army And Lockheed Martin Successfully Test PrSM Increment 2 Missile With Moving And Maritime Strike Capability
Artillery & Missile SystemsMilitary & Ordnance

US Army And Lockheed Martin Successfully Test PrSM Increment 2 Missile With Moving And Maritime Strike Capability

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: September 12, 2026 7:40 pm
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
3 Min Read
PrSM Increment 2 missile
Lockheed Martin’s Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) Increment 2 adds maritime-strike capability to the combat-proven baseline missile.
SHARE
¦ KEY FACTS AT A GLANCE
  • The US Army and Lockheed Martin conducted a successful flight test of the Precision Strike Missile Increment 2.
  • The new variant is designed to strike moving land targets and maritime targets at long range.
  • The capability strengthens US long range precision fires and supports joint operations against naval threats.
  • PrSM is designed to launch from HIMARS and M270A2 launchers that already serve in US and allied forces.
  • Increment 2 development marks a key step toward operational deployment later in the decade.

PrSM Increment 2 Test Marks Major Step In Long Range Precision Fires

The Precision Strike Missile Increment 2 recently completed a flight test conducted by the Lockheed Martin and the US Army, demonstrating progress toward a new long range weapon capable of striking moving land and maritime targets.

Contents
  • PrSM Increment 2 Test Marks Major Step In Long Range Precision Fires
  • The Big Picture
  • What Is Happening
  • Why It Matters
  • Strategic Implications
  • Competitor View
  • What To Watch Next
  • Capability Gap
  • The Bottom Line

The test represents another milestone in the evolution of the Precision Strike Missile program, which is replacing the aging Army Tactical Missile System. The new missile aims to extend range, improve precision, and enable new targeting capabilities across modern battlefields.

According to Lockheed Martin, the latest test successfully demonstrated the missile’s ability to support future moving target engagement missions. The capability would significantly expand the operational role of US ground based long range fires.

The Big Picture

Long range precision fires remain one of the central priorities in US military modernization. Army planners see deep strike weapons as critical tools for penetrating contested environments where aircraft or naval platforms may face heavy defenses.

- Advertisement -

The Precision Strike Missile program sits at the center of this effort. The missile allows ground forces to strike high value targets hundreds of kilometers away while operating from mobile launchers.

  • PrSM Increment 2 Missile

    PrSM Increment 2 Missile

    • Guidance System: GPS / INS with advanced targeting sensors
    • Maximum Speed: High Supersonic (Estimated Mach 3+)
    • Launch Compatibility: HIMARS, M270 MLRS
    • Warhead Technology: High Explosive precision warhead
    • View Details →
    8.0

    The introduction of a moving target capability reflects changing operational demands. Modern conflicts increasingly involve dynamic targets such as mobile missile launchers, command vehicles, or naval vessels operating within contested littoral zones.

    US defense leaders have repeatedly emphasized that future conflicts may require land forces to help control maritime spaces. The development of maritime strike capability for the Precision Strike Missile supports that concept.

    What Is Happening

    Engineers from Lockheed Martin and the US Army conducted the recent flight test of PrSM Increment 2 as part of the program’s development campaign.

    The test evaluated the missile’s ability to engage moving targets. This represents a major upgrade over the baseline PrSM design, which focuses primarily on fixed land targets.

    The missile is designed to launch from existing US Army platforms including the M142 HIMARS and the M270A2 MLRS. Both launchers already serve widely across the US military and allied forces.

    • M142 HIMARS

      M142 HIMARS

      • Caliber & Firepower: 227 mm Rockets / ATACMS Missile
      • Maximum Effective Range: 80 km (GMLRS) / 300 km (ATACMS)
      • Mobility / Platform Type: Truck-mounted (6×6 FMTV)
      • Fire Control & Targeting System: Digital FCS with GPS/INS Guidance
      • View Details →
      8.0

      Using these launch systems allows the Army to integrate the new missile without major infrastructure changes. This approach speeds up deployment while maintaining interoperability with existing units.

      The new Increment 2 version is expected to add a multi mode seeker that allows the missile to track and engage moving targets, including maritime vessels.

      Why It Matters

      Moving target capability fundamentally changes how the Precision Strike Missile can be used in combat.

      Traditional long range artillery weapons are effective against fixed targets such as infrastructure, airfields, or logistics hubs. However, modern warfare increasingly involves mobile systems that relocate quickly to avoid detection.

      A missile capable of tracking moving targets allows the Army to strike assets such as mobile missile launchers, armored formations, and naval vessels.

      This capability also strengthens joint operations with the US Navy and Air Force. Army launchers deployed on islands or coastal areas could provide long range maritime strike support during regional conflicts.

      Military planners often refer to this concept as land based anti ship capability. It creates additional dilemmas for adversaries by expanding the number of platforms that can threaten naval forces.

      Strategic Implications

      The development of PrSM Increment 2 fits into a broader US strategy focused on distributed strike capabilities.

      Instead of relying on a limited number of high value platforms, the US military is spreading long range weapons across multiple services and domains. Ground based missile systems add another layer to that approach.

      This concept is particularly relevant in the Indo Pacific. Island chains across the region could host mobile missile units capable of targeting hostile ships operating nearby.

      A network of such systems would complicate adversary planning and increase deterrence by expanding the threat envelope.

      The mobility of launchers such as the M142 HIMARS also allows units to relocate quickly after firing, reducing vulnerability to counter attacks.

      • M142 HIMARS

        M142 HIMARS

        • Caliber & Firepower: 227 mm Rockets / ATACMS Missile
        • Maximum Effective Range: 80 km (GMLRS) / 300 km (ATACMS)
        • Mobility / Platform Type: Truck-mounted (6×6 FMTV)
        • Fire Control & Targeting System: Digital FCS with GPS/INS Guidance
        • View Details →
        8.0

        Competitor View

        China and Russia closely monitor US developments in long range precision fires.

        Both countries have invested heavily in their own land based missile forces designed to threaten ships and bases across large regions.

        • PrSM Increment 2 Missile

          PrSM Increment 2 Missile

          • Guidance System: GPS / INS with advanced targeting sensors
          • Maximum Speed: High Supersonic (Estimated Mach 3+)
          • Launch Compatibility: HIMARS, M270 MLRS
          • Warhead Technology: High Explosive precision warhead
          • View Details →
          8.0

          China in particular has developed multiple anti ship ballistic missile systems as part of its anti access and area denial strategy.

          The addition of maritime targeting capability to the Precision Strike Missile suggests the United States is moving toward a more symmetrical capability set. Land based strike systems could help counter adversary naval operations in contested regions.

          Regional rivals may interpret the development as another step in expanding the reach of US ground forces into maritime domains.

          What To Watch Next

          Testing for PrSM Increment 2 is expected to continue as engineers refine guidance systems and target tracking capabilities.

          Future flight tests will likely focus on validating the missile’s seeker technology and its ability to engage maneuvering targets in complex environments.

          • PrSM Increment 2 Missile

            PrSM Increment 2 Missile

            • Guidance System: GPS / INS with advanced targeting sensors
            • Maximum Speed: High Supersonic (Estimated Mach 3+)
            • Launch Compatibility: HIMARS, M270 MLRS
            • Warhead Technology: High Explosive precision warhead
            • View Details →
            8.0

            The US Army also plans additional increments of the Precision Strike Missile program. Later versions may introduce further range improvements and expanded target sets.

            Operational deployment timelines will depend on the results of ongoing testing and procurement decisions by the Department of Defense.

            Capability Gap

            The Precision Strike Missile program addresses several limitations of earlier US Army missile systems.

            The aging Army Tactical Missile System offers limited missile capacity per launcher and lacks the advanced targeting flexibility required for modern battlefields.

            PrSM increases the number of missiles carried per launcher while adding improved accuracy and digital integration.

            Increment 2 specifically addresses the challenge of engaging moving targets. Without that capability, long range artillery systems struggle against mobile adversaries.

            • PrSM Increment 2 Missile

              PrSM Increment 2 Missile

              • Guidance System: GPS / INS with advanced targeting sensors
              • Maximum Speed: High Supersonic (Estimated Mach 3+)
              • Launch Compatibility: HIMARS, M270 MLRS
              • Warhead Technology: High Explosive precision warhead
              • View Details →
              8.0

              However, long range targeting still depends on reliable sensors and networked data sources. Accurate tracking data from drones, satellites, or reconnaissance aircraft remains essential for successful engagements.

              The Bottom Line

              The Precision Strike Missile Increment 2 test signals a major step toward giving US ground forces the ability to strike moving land and maritime targets at long range.

TAGGED:Lockheed Martinlong range missilesprecision strikePrSMUS Army
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie
  • Northrop YF-23 Fighter Northrop YF-23 Fighter
  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft
  • Rafale F5 Fighter Rafale F5 Fighter

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Destinus Produces 1,750 Ruta B1 Cruise Missiles as European Output Expands
  • Boeing Wins $11.1 Million Contract Modification for Kuwait F/A-18 Training Support
  • U.S. Navy Awards $23.1 Million Contract for Cybersecurity of Shipboard Power Systems
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $43.7 Million F-35 Reprogramming Lab Upgrade Contract
  • USS Colorado Arrives in Australia for AUKUS Submarine Maintenance

You Might Also Like

soldier reviews NGSW rifle 2025
Military & OrdnanceSmall Arms & Infantry Weapons

Soldiers Voice Candid Feedback on Army’s NGSW Rifle: Balancing Lethality Gains with Real-World Concerns

September 8, 2026
British Army RCH 155 wheeled artillery system mounted on Boxer armored vehicle during mobility and firing trials
Artillery & Missile SystemsMilitary & Ordnance

Britain Races To Deploy RCH 155 Artillery Systems Amid Expanding NATO Rearmament Push

October 3, 2026
U.S. Army soldier wearing enhanced night vision goggles during nighttime combat training exercise
Defense ContractsSmall Arms & Infantry Weapons

Elbit Systems Of America Secures $212 Million Deal For Enhanced Night Vision Goggles

September 7, 2026
Borsuk IFV
Military & OrdnanceTanks & Armored Vehicles

Poland’s Next‑Gen IFV: First Borsuk IFV Enters Service with Polish Army

September 13, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?