- The US Army and Lockheed Martin conducted a successful flight test of the Precision Strike Missile Increment 2.
- The new variant is designed to strike moving land targets and maritime targets at long range.
- The capability strengthens US long range precision fires and supports joint operations against naval threats.
- PrSM is designed to launch from HIMARS and M270A2 launchers that already serve in US and allied forces.
- Increment 2 development marks a key step toward operational deployment later in the decade.
PrSM Increment 2 Test Marks Major Step In Long Range Precision Fires
The Precision Strike Missile Increment 2 recently completed a flight test conducted by the Lockheed Martin and the US Army, demonstrating progress toward a new long range weapon capable of striking moving land and maritime targets.
The test represents another milestone in the evolution of the Precision Strike Missile program, which is replacing the aging Army Tactical Missile System. The new missile aims to extend range, improve precision, and enable new targeting capabilities across modern battlefields.
According to Lockheed Martin, the latest test successfully demonstrated the missile’s ability to support future moving target engagement missions. The capability would significantly expand the operational role of US ground based long range fires.
The Big Picture
Long range precision fires remain one of the central priorities in US military modernization. Army planners see deep strike weapons as critical tools for penetrating contested environments where aircraft or naval platforms may face heavy defenses.
The Precision Strike Missile program sits at the center of this effort. The missile allows ground forces to strike high value targets hundreds of kilometers away while operating from mobile launchers.
The introduction of a moving target capability reflects changing operational demands. Modern conflicts increasingly involve dynamic targets such as mobile missile launchers, command vehicles, or naval vessels operating within contested littoral zones.
US defense leaders have repeatedly emphasized that future conflicts may require land forces to help control maritime spaces. The development of maritime strike capability for the Precision Strike Missile supports that concept.
What Is Happening
Engineers from Lockheed Martin and the US Army conducted the recent flight test of PrSM Increment 2 as part of the program’s development campaign.
The test evaluated the missile’s ability to engage moving targets. This represents a major upgrade over the baseline PrSM design, which focuses primarily on fixed land targets.
The missile is designed to launch from existing US Army platforms including the M142 HIMARS and the M270A2 MLRS. Both launchers already serve widely across the US military and allied forces.
Using these launch systems allows the Army to integrate the new missile without major infrastructure changes. This approach speeds up deployment while maintaining interoperability with existing units.
The new Increment 2 version is expected to add a multi mode seeker that allows the missile to track and engage moving targets, including maritime vessels.
Why It Matters
Moving target capability fundamentally changes how the Precision Strike Missile can be used in combat.
Traditional long range artillery weapons are effective against fixed targets such as infrastructure, airfields, or logistics hubs. However, modern warfare increasingly involves mobile systems that relocate quickly to avoid detection.
A missile capable of tracking moving targets allows the Army to strike assets such as mobile missile launchers, armored formations, and naval vessels.
This capability also strengthens joint operations with the US Navy and Air Force. Army launchers deployed on islands or coastal areas could provide long range maritime strike support during regional conflicts.
Military planners often refer to this concept as land based anti ship capability. It creates additional dilemmas for adversaries by expanding the number of platforms that can threaten naval forces.
Strategic Implications
The development of PrSM Increment 2 fits into a broader US strategy focused on distributed strike capabilities.
Instead of relying on a limited number of high value platforms, the US military is spreading long range weapons across multiple services and domains. Ground based missile systems add another layer to that approach.
This concept is particularly relevant in the Indo Pacific. Island chains across the region could host mobile missile units capable of targeting hostile ships operating nearby.
A network of such systems would complicate adversary planning and increase deterrence by expanding the threat envelope.
The mobility of launchers such as the M142 HIMARS also allows units to relocate quickly after firing, reducing vulnerability to counter attacks.
Competitor View
China and Russia closely monitor US developments in long range precision fires.
Both countries have invested heavily in their own land based missile forces designed to threaten ships and bases across large regions.
China in particular has developed multiple anti ship ballistic missile systems as part of its anti access and area denial strategy.
The addition of maritime targeting capability to the Precision Strike Missile suggests the United States is moving toward a more symmetrical capability set. Land based strike systems could help counter adversary naval operations in contested regions.
Regional rivals may interpret the development as another step in expanding the reach of US ground forces into maritime domains.
What To Watch Next
Testing for PrSM Increment 2 is expected to continue as engineers refine guidance systems and target tracking capabilities.
Future flight tests will likely focus on validating the missile’s seeker technology and its ability to engage maneuvering targets in complex environments.
The US Army also plans additional increments of the Precision Strike Missile program. Later versions may introduce further range improvements and expanded target sets.
Operational deployment timelines will depend on the results of ongoing testing and procurement decisions by the Department of Defense.
Capability Gap
The Precision Strike Missile program addresses several limitations of earlier US Army missile systems.
The aging Army Tactical Missile System offers limited missile capacity per launcher and lacks the advanced targeting flexibility required for modern battlefields.
PrSM increases the number of missiles carried per launcher while adding improved accuracy and digital integration.
Increment 2 specifically addresses the challenge of engaging moving targets. Without that capability, long range artillery systems struggle against mobile adversaries.
However, long range targeting still depends on reliable sensors and networked data sources. Accurate tracking data from drones, satellites, or reconnaissance aircraft remains essential for successful engagements.
The Bottom Line
The Precision Strike Missile Increment 2 test signals a major step toward giving US ground forces the ability to strike moving land and maritime targets at long range.
Global Surge in Long-Range Precision Fires Efforts
Modern militaries are aggressively modernizing artillery and rocket systems, prioritizing long-range precision fires (LRPF) to meet evolving threats. The U.S. Army and its allies are deploying systems like GMARS, upgrading with HIMARS/PrSM, and experimenting with innovative procurement models.
GMARS Doubles Down on HIMARS Capabilities
Lockheed Martin’s Global Mobile Artillery Rocket System (GMARS) recently completed its first live-fire test at White Sands, New Mexico. Capable of firing 12 GMLRS rockets, four PrSMs, or two ATACMS missiles, GMARS delivers flexibility from 43 to as much as 310 miles—and the payload capacity is double that of traditional HIMARS. Built on Rheinmetall’s HX truck chassis, GMARS emphasizes modularity and compatibility across U.S. and allied systems—key to future multinational operations.

Australia Steps Up with First PrSM Launch
Australia marked a major modernization milestone with its first-ever Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) firing, launched from a HIMARS at Mount Bundey. The missile flew over 300 km, reached 60,000 ft altitude, and scored a direct hit—surpassing expectations by two years. This live test, part of Talisman Sabre 2025, highlights Australia’s drive to enhance long-range strike capability and aligns with the 2024 National Defence Strategyl.
HIMARS Becoming the New Norm in Indo-Pacific Artillery
In the Pacific theatre, the U.S. Army’s 25th Infantry Division has begun transitioning from traditional howitzers to agile HIMARS units. Replacing eight 105 mm and six 155 mm howitzers with 16 HIMARS systems, the move increases precision and lethality while reducing manpower by 119 soldiers. This shift reinforces the Army’s operational agility and firepower in the Free and Open Indo-Pacific region.
Innovation Through Open-Source Artillery Shells
Beyond hardware upgrades, new procurement strategies are emerging. Tiberius Aerospace introduced the Sceptre, an advanced 155 mm rocket-propelled artillery shell with up to 95 mile range and precision targeting—capable even in GPS-denied environments. Its unique “defense-as-a-service” model licenses design for local manufacture and continuous upgrades, offering agile, decentralized development.
Modernization Challenges and Strategy Insights
Developing Integrated Software for Precision Fires
At home, the U.S. Army’s Precision Fires team is laying the groundwork for software-driven artillery systems. Applying Dev*Ops, automation, AI-assisted code reviews, and continuous integration/deployment, the team has accelerated fielding of systems like PrSM and HIMARS, delivering 21 fielding events in 2025 alone.
Learning from Setbacks—GAO Highlights Need for Iterative Development
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) reviewed LRPF programs such as ERCA, PrSM, Mid-Range Capability, and Long-Range Hypersonic Weapon. It found mixed progress, with some programs canceled or delayed due to linear development methods. The GAO recommends adopting iterative development, digital twins, and continuous business-case evaluation for future modernization efforts.
Broader Context & Strategic Implications
The global shift toward LRPF reflects changing operational environments—great powers and regional conflicts underscore the need for precision, range, and interoperability. Systems like GMARS and PrSM offer scalable response; HIMARS units enhance mobility; and innovations like Sceptre challenge traditional acquisition paradigms. Yet, sustained success depends on modern software practices, iterative development, and cohesive alliance integration.
FAQs
What is GMARS and how does it improve over HIMARS?GMARS (Global Mobile Artillery Rocket System) can carry double the munitions of HIMARS—12 GMLRS, four PrSMs, or two ATACMS—extending engagement ranges to 310 miles with modular interoperability.
Why is Australia’s PrSM launch significant?It is Australia’s first PrSM firing, flown from HIMARS over 300 km, ahead of schedule, showcasing growing long-range strike capability and bilateral cooperation with the U.S.
How are missile forces in the Pacific being enhanced?The U.S. Army’s 25th Infantry Division has transitioned from traditional howitzers to more agile HIMARS units, improving long-range precision fires and reducing manpower requirements.
What is novel about the Sceptre artillery shell model?Sceptre introduces a “defense-as-a-service” open-source licensing approach, enabling local production and iterative upgrades—a departure from traditional centralized procurement.
What development approach do experts recommend for future artillery modernization?The GAO advocates for iterative development, digital engineering, and continuous reassessment of business cases to improve outcomes in long-range fires programs.


