• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » U.S. Navy Tests Robotic At Sea Refueling To Extend T38 USV Endurance
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

U.S. Navy Tests Robotic At Sea Refueling To Extend T38 USV Endurance

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 12:10 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
13 Min Read
T38 unmanned surface vessel
The U.S. Navy has successfully demonstrated repeated robotic at-sea refueling of its T38 unmanned surface vessel marking a major step toward longer-duration autonomous maritime operations with reduced dependence on port infrastructure and crewed logistics support (Picture Source: Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division)
SHARE

U.S. Navy Demonstrates Robotic At Sea Refueling For T38 USV

The U.S. Navy has demonstrated robotic at sea refueling of a T38 unmanned surface vessel, showing how unmanned craft could remain on station longer without returning to port for fuel. The Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division’s Blue Water Instrumentation program led the demonstration with industry partner Sealartec, using a robotic towable capture and connection device.

Contents
  • U.S. Navy Demonstrates Robotic At Sea Refueling For T38 USV
  • Takeaways
  • How The Robotic Refueling System Worked
  • T38 Provides The Test Platform
  • Why Refueling Matters For Unmanned Naval Operations
  • From Operator Assisted Testing To Autonomous Refueling
  • A Broader Navy Push Toward Persistent Unmanned Vessels
  • The Technical Challenge Is More Than Fuel Transfer
  • Implications For Long Duration Naval Operations
  • Earlier U.S. Navy Work On Unmanned At Sea Refueling
  • What Comes Next

Takeaways

The U.S. Navy has demonstrated a robotic system capable of refueling a T38 unmanned surface vessel at sea, addressing a major endurance limitation for long duration unmanned operations.

1. T38 Refueled At Sea

The Navy used a robotic towable capture and connection device to repeatedly capture, refuel and release a T38 unmanned surface vessel during an August 11 demonstration off Virginia.

2. 400 Gallons Transferred

The training support vessel USNS Vindicator towed the robotic connector and transferred a total of 400 gallons of fuel to the T38 during the demonstration.

3. About 100 Connection Cycles

The refueling system completed approximately 100 connection cycles during testing conducted over several days, including the at sea event.

4. Next Step Is Autonomous Refueling

The Navy plans an end to end demonstration covering autonomous rendezvous, approach, capture, fuel transfer, disconnection and return to mission.

5. Long Range Testing Is A Key Driver

The Navy’s Blue Water Instrumentation program is developing the capability partly to keep unmanned vessels on station during testing of hypersonic and precision long range weapons.

The August 11 demonstration took place off Joint Expeditionary Base Little Creek Fort Story, Virginia. The Navy-industry team used the training support vessel USNS Vindicator to tow the refueling device while the T38 approached, connected, received fuel and separated from the system.

The demonstration represents an important development for unmanned maritime operations because fuel endurance can determine how long a USV can provide surveillance, instrumentation or other support away from a port or crewed support vessel.

How The Robotic Refueling System Worked

The system tested by the Navy is based on Sealartec’s towable capture and connection device, or TCCD. Rather than requiring personnel to manually handle a conventional refueling hose on the receiving USV, the system is designed to allow the unmanned vessel to capture the connection point while operating at sea.

- Advertisement -

During the August demonstration, the T38 repeatedly conducted full capture, refueling and release cycles. The Navy reported that the system transferred 400 gallons of fuel to the T38.

The testing was not limited to a single successful connection. According to Sealartec’s chief executive Amitai Peleg, approximately 100 connection cycles were completed during several days of testing leading up to and including the main event.

That repeated testing matters because an operational refueling system has to function reliably despite vessel movement, relative speed, waves, wind and variations in positioning. A system that works once under controlled conditions would have limited operational value without repeatability.

T38 Provides The Test Platform

The T38, developed by Maritime Tactical Systems, is a compact unmanned surface vessel designed around a modular architecture and autonomous operations.

MARTAC identifies the Devil Ray T38 as a platform combining high speed, payload capacity and endurance, with an open architecture intended to support different payloads and missions. The company also reports that a T38 completed a 192 hour autonomous mission off California in May 2026.

The Navy has previously employed T38 Devil Ray vessels in experimentation with unmanned systems. In the Middle East, U.S. Naval Forces Central Command’s Task Force 59 used T38 USVs during exercises involving manned and unmanned teaming and demonstrated the ability to engage maritime targets with an embarked Lethal Miniature Aerial Missile System.

The platform’s relatively small size makes the refueling demonstration particularly relevant. The Navy is not simply testing how a large unmanned ship can receive fuel from a conventional oiler. It is examining how smaller autonomous vessels can be supported without putting additional personnel aboard the receiving platform.

Why Refueling Matters For Unmanned Naval Operations

Endurance is one of the central challenges facing unmanned surface vessels.

- Advertisement -

An unmanned platform can remove the need for crew accommodations, life support and many other systems associated with conventional ships. That can create more room for fuel, sensors, communications equipment or mission payloads. But a USV still has to manage its available energy and eventually return to port or receive support.

The Navy’s Blue Water Instrumentation program is particularly interested in this problem because its assets support testing of advanced long range weapons. According to the Navy, hypersonic and precision long range fires can require flight profiles extending thousands of miles beyond fixed range boundaries, creating a need for data collection assets distributed over large areas.

If an unmanned instrumentation vessel has to return to port whenever its fuel supply becomes limiting, the resulting gap can reduce coverage and interrupt a test sequence.

At sea refueling changes that equation. Instead of treating fuel exhaustion as a hard endpoint for an unmanned mission, the Navy can potentially build a support architecture in which smaller USVs receive fuel from other maritime assets while remaining within the operating area.

From Operator Assisted Testing To Autonomous Refueling

The latest demonstration was an important step, but it should not be confused with a completely autonomous refueling operation.

The Navy described the next milestone as an end to end autonomous refueling demonstration. That test is expected to cover vessel rendezvous and approach, capture, fuel transfer, disconnection and return to mission as one continuous evolution.

The distinction is important. Autonomous navigation and autonomous refueling are separate technical problems that must eventually work together.

A USV approaching a moving refueling device must determine its relative position and movement accurately enough to establish a connection. The system must then maintain a stable relationship during fuel transfer and safely disengage before returning to its assigned mission.

The Navy’s current work also includes reducing command and control latency and integrating next generation local positioning systems to improve maneuvering and support autonomous refueling.

A Broader Navy Push Toward Persistent Unmanned Vessels

The T38 demonstration fits into a larger U.S. Navy effort to make unmanned surface vessels more persistent and useful in operational environments.

In May 2026, the Navy selected seven companies to advance through at sea testing under its Medium Unmanned Surface Vessel marketplace. The selected companies are Sea Machines, Leidos, Saronic Technologies, Galliano Marine Services, PacMar Technologies, Birdon and Huntington Ingalls Industries. Successful vessels are expected to become eligible for follow on production opportunities.

The Navy has also pursued technologies that allow larger unmanned vessels to operate for extended periods without routine human intervention. In 2023, Naval Sea Systems Command announced completion of a 720 hour continuous power demonstration for a diesel generator intended for Large USV operations.

Together, these efforts address different parts of the same operational problem: an unmanned vessel is most useful when it can remain deployed without requiring frequent human intervention.

The Technical Challenge Is More Than Fuel Transfer

The hardest part of robotic refueling is not necessarily moving fuel from one tank to another. The more difficult challenge is reliably connecting two moving systems in an uncontrolled maritime environment.

Several factors become important as the Navy moves toward full autonomy:

ChallengeOperational Requirement
Vessel rendezvousAccurate relative navigation between USV and refueling system
Approach controlPrecise maneuvering despite waves, wind and vessel motion
Physical captureReliable connection without personnel intervention
Fuel transferControlled transfer while maintaining the connection
DisconnectionSafe separation without damaging either platform
PositioningHigh accuracy local positioning for close maneuvering
Command and controlLow latency communications and reliable supervisory control
Mission recoveryUSV must automatically return to its assigned mission

These requirements explain why the Navy is progressing through repeated connection testing before attempting a fully autonomous evolution.

The approach also reduces risk by separating the problem into manageable stages. The T38 demonstration first establishes that a robotic connection mechanism can repeatedly capture and release the vessel and transfer fuel at sea. Future tests can add more autonomous decision making and navigation.

Implications For Long Duration Naval Operations

The immediate application is Navy weapons testing, but the underlying capability has broader implications for unmanned maritime operations.

A USV that can receive fuel without returning to port could spend more time collecting sensor data, supporting range operations, conducting surveillance or performing other assigned tasks. More importantly, the Navy could distribute unmanned platforms across larger operating areas while reducing the frequency of crewed support missions.

That can improve the efficiency of a distributed force. Instead of designing every unmanned vessel around maximum possible endurance, the Navy can begin considering an ecosystem in which smaller platforms are periodically supported by other vessels.

The concept also aligns with the Navy’s broader interest in distributing capabilities across more platforms. The service has described unmanned systems as a way to increase operational persistence and expand naval power while creating additional options for fleet operations.

Earlier U.S. Navy Work On Unmanned At Sea Refueling

The T38 test is not the Navy’s first attempt to solve the refueling problem.

In December 2024, DARPA announced that its No Manning Required Ship program had completed an at sea fueling test involving the experimental unmanned surface vessels Ranger and Mariner. The test demonstrated a refueling probe connection without human assistance on the receiving side.

That work demonstrated an important principle for unmanned maritime systems: the receiving vessel should be able to participate in refueling without requiring personnel to handle hoses or lines.

The newer T38 demonstration advances the concept through a different architecture using a towable robotic connector. It therefore adds another approach to the Navy’s growing body of experience with unmanned vessel logistics.

What Comes Next

The next major milestone for the Blue Water Instrumentation team is an end to end autonomous refueling demonstration.

The Navy says that effort will combine rendezvous, approach, capture, fuel transfer, disconnection and return to mission. The program also plans to reduce command and control latency and introduce improved local positioning technology to support more precise autonomous maneuvering.

For the T38 and similar USVs, successful development of these capabilities would address one of the practical limits on persistent unmanned operations. The significance is not simply that a robotic system transferred fuel at sea, but that the Navy is working toward a support model in which unmanned vessels can refuel, resume their missions and remain deployed with less dependence on crewed intervention.

TAGGED:Robotic RefuelingT38 USV
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • Tomahawk Block V Missile Tomahawk Block V Missile
  • Tomahawk Block IV Missile Tomahawk Block IV Missile
  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet
  • Spirit UAS Spirit UAS
  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • P-800 Oniks Missile: Range, Speed and BrahMos Comparison
  • Ukrainian Drone Unit Caused 70% of Simulated U.S. Brigade Casualties in Germany Exercise
  • OCCAR Marks 25 Years of European Defense Cooperation With 28 Programs
  • Saab Q3 2026 Results Show 30.6% Organic Sales Growth as Orders Surge
  • How Much Does a Tomahawk Missile Cost? Price, Range and Blocks

You Might Also Like

USS New Jersey attack submarine
Naval & MaritimeSubmarines

U.S. Navy Expands Undersea Readiness As USS New Jersey Attack Submarine Returns To Service

September 12, 2026
Saudi MMSC frigate program
Naval & Maritime

First Saudi MMSC Frigate HMS Saud Launched at U.S. Shipyard

January 2, 2026
SRV-F Mk3 submarine rescue vehicle
Naval & MaritimeSubmarines

UK Unveils SRV-F Mk3 Submarine Rescue Vehicle To Expand 50-Crew Recovery Capability

April 22, 2026
HMS Dragon
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Iran Issues Threat Against British Warship Amid Rising Gulf Tensions

May 10, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?