Belgium Grants Military Authority to Shoot Down Drones Over Its Bases

What happened, when and where

On 3 November 2025, the Belgian Armed Forces’ Chief of Defense, Frederik Vansina, publicly announced that the military has been granted the authority to shoot down unidentified drones flying over Belgian military bases — provided engagements can be carried out safely and without collateral damage. The decision follows successive nights of small- and larger-scale drone intrusions, most notably over the Kleine-Brogel Air Base near Peer in the Belgian province of Limburg.

Background: contextualizing the drone threat

In recent weeks, Belgium has reported a spate of drone incursions over both military and civilian sites. For example, earlier in October, drones were observed above a military facility in Marche-en-Famenne. At Kleine-Brogel — a base widely understood to host U.S. nuclear weapons under NATO sharing arrangements — a number of unmanned aerial vehicles were detected over consecutive nights. Meanwhile, Belgium’s current counter-UAV capabilities (detection, jamming, drone-guns) are described as “limited”.

Details: orders, data and official sources

During a formal arrival ceremony for a new mine-hunter vessel in Zeebrugge on 3 November, Chief of Defense Vansina said:

“The order has been given to shoot them down.”
He added that such engagements “must be done without causing collateral damage” and acknowledged the challenge posed by small, maneuverable drones flying at night.

The directive follows reported sightings of four drones over Kleine-Brogel on the evening of Sunday, 2 November — marking the third consecutive night of drone activity above Belgian military and civilian sites.

Defense Minister Theo Francken characterized the activity as likely espionage-oriented, stating that small drones first “tested radio frequencies” followed by larger drones “to destabilize the area”.

Belgium is preparing an accelerated program to bolster its drone defense capability. According to reporting the counter-UAS dossier worth approximately €50 million will be submitted to the Council of Ministers imminently, with a longer-term plan of over €500 million under consideration.

Analysis: capability gap and strategic implication

Belgium’s decision highlights two key dynamics: one, the increasing frequency and sophistication of drone incursions on military-sensitive sites; two, the lag in European defense systems adapted to counter-UAS threats. Analysts note that detecting and intercepting small unmanned aircraft remains technically difficult, especially in dark and complex environments.

By granting shoot-down authority, Belgium joins a growing number of NATO members seeking to empower defense forces to act more decisively against UAS threats. For example, Lithuania recently passed legislation authorizing its armed forces to destroy unauthorized drones entering its airspace.

Operationally, the engagement rule remains subject to safety constraints — any strike must minimize risk to civilians and infrastructure. Vansina’s statement acknowledges the complexity of choosing when and how to act. Until new systems are fielded, Belgian forces rely on jammers and early detection equipment, which have shown mixed effectiveness.

Expert or policy perspective

Security commentators emphasize that arming military bases with layered counter-UAS defenses — including radar, RF sensors, jammers, and hard-kill interceptors — is now a strategic imperative. For Belgium, NATO member and host to US assets, the stakes are elevated. The incident at Kleine-Brogel, given its nuclear-sharing role, raises particular concern about state-sponsored reconnaissance or provocation through drones.

Moreover, the Belgian case underscores the tension between civilian airspace regulation and military authorities’ need to defend critical infrastructure. Robust legal frameworks and rules of engagement will be vital as drone technology and threat vectors evolve rapidly.

What’s next / Impact

Going forward, Belgium will present a formal counter-UAS plan to its government, fast-tracking procurement of systems designed to detect, track and neutralize drones around key bases. If effective, this will enhance Belgium’s posture and serve as a model for other NATO countries facing similar threats.

Meanwhile, the practical rollout of shoot-down authority may serve as a deterrent to further incursions. However, until detection and interception capabilities are improved, unidentified drones will continue to challenge base protection regimes. The Belgian move may catalyze further coordination among European states on counter-drone policy, shared procurement and force protection standards.

Source