• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Advances F-16 Passive Targeting With Legion Pod-to-Pod Data Link
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Lockheed Martin Advances F-16 Passive Targeting With Legion Pod-to-Pod Data Link

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 16, 2026 11:41 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
10 Min Read
Legion Pod F-16 targeting
Photo: Lockheed Martin.
SHARE

Executive Summary: Lockheed Martin has demonstrated a pod-to-pod data link connecting Legion infrared search-and-track systems on two F-16 fighters, allowing the aircraft to combine passive sensor measurements during flight. The test, conducted with the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Test Center, demonstrated improved target tracking and near-instantaneous range solutions without depending on radar. The capability is designed to improve F-16 targeting and situational awareness when active sensors face electronic warfare, jamming, or emissions constraints. Lockheed Martin says continued testing will examine transportability, performance across other platforms and networks, and integration with software-defined radios and multi-waveform gateways.

Legion Pod Brings Networked Passive Targeting to F-16

Lockheed Martin has demonstrated a Legion Pod F-16 targeting capability that allows two F-16 fighters to exchange infrared sensor information directly, improving passive target tracking in radar-denied and contested airspace. The September 2026 flight test was conducted from Morris Air National Guard Base in Tucson, Arizona, with the Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Test Center, known as AATC.

Contents
  • Legion Pod Brings Networked Passive Targeting to F-16
  • How the Legion Pod Works
    • Legion Pod Capability At A Glance
  • Why Pod-to-Pod Networking Matters
  • HiveLink Adds a Resilient Networking Layer
  • F-16 Gains Another Option for Radar-Contested Operations
  • From Individual Sensors to Distributed Targeting
  • Next Steps Include Other Platforms and Networks

Both F-16s carried Legion pods equipped with a pre-production version of L3Harris Technologies’ HiveLink data link. The aircraft used the shared sensor information to refine target tracks and generate near-instantaneous engagement solutions for multiple airborne targets without relying on radar.

The demonstration builds on earlier U.S. Air Force testing that showed F-15 and F-16 aircraft could use Legion’s Advanced Datalink to share infrared search-and-track data and passively triangulate an airborne target.

How the Legion Pod Works

Legion is a passive infrared search-and-track system based on the IRST21 sensor. Unlike radar, an IRST system detects and tracks targets through their infrared signatures without transmitting a radar signal.

- Advertisement -

The distinction matters in contested airspace. A fighter using radar must transmit electromagnetic energy, potentially increasing its exposure to electronic surveillance and countermeasures. A passive infrared sensor can instead collect target information without making the same type of radar transmission.

The principal limitation of passive sensing is range determination. A single passive sensor can establish the angular position of a target, but accurately determining distance generally requires additional information or measurements.

Legion’s pod-to-pod architecture addresses that problem by allowing two aircraft with separated sensors to compare their observations.

Lockheed Martin has previously described the concept as providing a form of rapid depth perception. Two geographically separated sensors observe the same target from different positions, allowing the system to derive additional information about target location.

The U.S. Air Force demonstrated the underlying concept in April 2022, when an F-15C and an F-16, both equipped with Legion Pods, shared IRST data through the Advanced Datalink and passively triangulated a target without radar or another active ranging source.

Legion Pod Capability At A Glance

CapabilityDescription
SensorIRST21 infrared search and track
Platform testedF-16 Fighting Falcon
NetworkingPod-to-pod data link
Current test radioPre-production HiveLink
Targeting methodPassive infrared sensing
Ranging approachCooperative measurements between pods
Radar requirementNot required for the demonstrated passive targeting function
Primary operating environmentRadar-denied and contested airspace
Development partnersLockheed Martin, Air National Guard, AATC, L3Harris

Source: Lockheed Martin, U.S. Air Force and L3Harris.

Why Pod-to-Pod Networking Matters

The important change is not simply the addition of another infrared sensor to the F-16. It is the networking of those sensors.

A conventional aircraft sensor operates from its own position and perspective. When multiple aircraft can exchange sensor measurements rapidly, the formation can construct a more complete picture of an airborne target than any single platform could generate independently.

- Advertisement -

That creates particular value for passive air-to-air operations. Two or more fighters can observe a target without necessarily requiring every aircraft to activate its radar.

The 2022 U.S. Air Force test demonstrated this principle with an F-15 and F-16. The service said the ability to share information gave warfighters information they would not otherwise have from their individual viewpoints.

The September 2026 demonstration extends that concept specifically to direct communication between Legion-equipped F-16s.

Lockheed Martin said the latest capability is intended to reduce pilot workload and shorten target-engagement timelines. Direct communication between the pods can also preserve aircraft bandwidth for other mission requirements, according to the company.

HiveLink Adds a Resilient Networking Layer

The latest test used a pre-production version of HiveLink, developed by L3Harris.

L3Harris describes HiveLink as a high-assurance software-defined radio designed for contested and denied environments. It combines mesh networking, encryption and multi-waveform flexibility in a compact form factor and supports both line-of-sight and beyond-line-of-sight connectivity.

The system is designed to form and repair network paths as conditions change. L3Harris says HiveLink can operate across airborne, unmanned and ground platforms and supports interoperability with existing U.S., NATO and coalition systems.

That architecture is relevant to the Legion concept because passive targeting depends not only on the quality of the infrared sensor, but also on the ability to move measurements between aircraft quickly and reliably.

In a heavily contested electromagnetic environment, communications themselves can become a vulnerability. The networking system therefore has to balance data throughput, transmission characteristics, spectrum availability, resilience and platform size, weight and power constraints.

F-16 Gains Another Option for Radar-Contested Operations

The F-16 remains a major U.S. and allied fighter platform, and newer configurations are increasingly being equipped with improved sensors, displays and electronic systems.

Lockheed Martin identifies Legion-ES as an infrared search-and-track option for the F-16 Block 70/72, alongside the aircraft’s AESA radar and Sniper Advanced Targeting Pod.

The Legion approach does not replace the F-16’s radar. Instead, it provides another sensing method that can contribute to the aircraft’s broader sensor architecture.

That distinction is important because modern air combat increasingly depends on combining information from different sensors rather than relying on one source.

A passive IRST can provide useful information when radar emissions are undesirable or when the electromagnetic environment is heavily contested. Networked IRST can add another layer by allowing several aircraft to combine their observations.

From Individual Sensors to Distributed Targeting

The broader significance of the demonstration is the move toward distributed sensing.

Modern combat aircraft increasingly operate as nodes in larger networks. Instead of requiring every fighter to independently detect, identify, locate and track the same target, networked sensors can distribute observations across multiple platforms.

The Legion architecture fits that model because the pod provides a relatively self-contained sensor capability while its open architecture is designed to support integration with other systems. Lockheed Martin says the system has completed integration and flight testing on F-16 and F-15C aircraft.

The company also says Legion can accommodate additional sensors within its existing structure, potentially allowing the pod to evolve beyond its baseline IRST configuration.

The U.S. Air Force’s earlier testing also pointed toward broader platform interoperability. Officials said the goal was eventually to provide the capability to aircraft carrying an Advanced Datalink-equipped Legion Pod, regardless of platform.

That approach is relevant to mixed formations containing different fighter types and, potentially, crewed and uncrewed aircraft.

Next Steps Include Other Platforms and Networks

Lockheed Martin says F-16 flight testing will continue under an Air National Guard contract.

The next phase is expected to examine system performance, transportability and interoperability with other platforms and networks. Planned work includes integration of software-defined radios and multi-waveform gateways.

The company also intends to expand Legion’s potential role in operations involving crewed and uncrewed aircraft.

That direction is consistent with the wider development of distributed air operations, where fighters, uncrewed aircraft and other sensors can contribute different pieces of the same targeting picture.

For the F-16, the immediate significance is more specific: the aircraft can use a podded infrared sensor while exchanging measurements with another fighter, allowing passive observations to contribute to target ranging and engagement calculations.

The latest test therefore represents an incremental but technically important development in F-16 sensor networking. It combines a mature passive infrared sensing concept with a more resilient communications architecture, giving the aircraft another way to generate targeting information when conventional radar use is constrained.

TAGGED:F-16 Fighting FalconLegion Pod
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb
  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker
  • YU-20 Tanker YU-20 Tanker
  • China KJ-500 Aircraft China KJ-500 Aircraft
  • SPY-6 Radar SPY-6 Radar
  • Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft
  • SM-3 Block IB Missile SM-3 Block IB Missile
  • USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier

Recent Compares

  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →
  • F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • US Military Weighs MOAB for Potential Future Strikes on Iran, CNN Reports
  • Saab Wins $120 Million Order for New Gripen Flight Control Computer
  • L3Harris Delivers First VAMPIRE Counter-Drone Systems to U.S. Army
  • Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs
  • Lockheed Martin Taps Avio for ER GMLRS and PrSM Rocket Motor Production

You Might Also Like

Qarbon Aerospace F 22 contract
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Qarbon Aerospace Returns To F-22 Raptor Program With Composite Structures Contract For Fleet Sustainment

September 7, 2026
Shield AI X-BAT wind tunnel testing
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

Shield AI Starts Wind Tunnel Testing of X-BAT Autonomous Fighter Prototype

September 9, 2026
A-10 Warthog
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Last A-10 Warthog Departs Nellis, Closing a 49-Year Close Air Support Era

September 24, 2026
Boeing F-47 fighter jet
Aerospace & Aviation

Key Features of Boeing’s Sixth-Gen F-47 Fighter Jet That Define Next-Gen Air Superiority

August 28, 2025

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?