• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Acting Navy Secretary Tours Blount Island Marine Logistics Hub
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Acting Navy Secretary Tours Blount Island Marine Logistics Hub

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: November 9, 2026 10:32 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
4 Min Read
Blount Island Marine Corps
Image : U.S. Marine Corps
SHARE

Acting Navy Secretary Tours Blount Island, Examines Marine Corps Global Logistics Network

Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao visited Marine Corps Support Facility Blount Island in Jacksonville, Florida, on November 4, 2026, to examine how the installation prepares, maintains and positions military equipment for U.S. Marines operating around the world.

Contents
Acting Navy Secretary Tours Blount Island, Examines Marine Corps Global Logistics NetworkHow Blount Island supports Marine deploymentsA real-world example: 22nd MEU equipment transferEmergency replacement parts for deployed vehiclesWaterfront infrastructure also supports Navy trainingWhy the Marine Corps needs forward-positioned equipmentIndustrial waterfront capacity remains a readiness requirement

The visit brought attention to an important part of Marine Corps readiness that receives less public attention than ships, aircraft and weapons systems: the logistics infrastructure needed to move combat equipment from storage facilities to deployed forces.

Blount Island Command, which operates under Marine Corps Logistics Command, manages equipment preparation, maintenance and distribution activities supporting the service’s forward-positioned logistics network.

During the visit, Marine Corps Col. David Merles, commander of Blount Island Command, and installation department director Michael Erhardt briefed Cao aboard the Military Sealift Command vessel USNS Dahl.

- Advertisement -

Their briefing covered the facility’s waterfront infrastructure, maintenance warehouses, equipment staging areas and slipway facilities used to support Marine Corps logistics operations.

Blount Island Marine Corps
Michael Erhardt, Marine Corps Support Facility Blount Island installation department director, reviews briefing materials with Acting Secretary of the Navy Hung Cao during a tour aboard the USNS Dahl in Florida, Nov. 4, 2026.

Cao was accompanied by Benjamin Kohlmann, assistant secretary of the Navy for manpower and reserve affairs, and Marjorie Lutz, assistant deputy commandant of the Marine Corps for installations and logistics. Marine Corps Brig. Gen. Kevin Collins, commander of Marine Corps Logistics Command, also participated.

According to the Department of War’s November 6 report, the visit focused on how Blount Island’s industrial waterfront supports the positioning and movement of equipment for Marines worldwide.

How Blount Island supports Marine deployments

Located along the St. Johns River in Jacksonville, Blount Island is an important component of the Marine Corps’ equipment prepositioning and sustainment system.

Its mission extends beyond conventional equipment storage. The installation supports the preparation, inspection, maintenance, replacement and distribution of equipment and supplies that can be positioned aboard ships or at facilities ashore closer to operational areas.

This arrangement allows Marine forces to access equipment without having to transport every vehicle, supply item and support asset from the continental United States after a crisis begins.

Blount Island Command coordinates these activities as part of the Marine Corps’ wider forward-positioned sustainment network.

The installation supports both afloat and ashore prepositioning programs, including the Maritime Prepositioning Force and the Marine Corps Prepositioning Program-Norway.

- Advertisement -

The Maritime Prepositioning Force uses strategically positioned ships carrying equipment and supplies intended to support Marine expeditionary forces. Marines can deploy separately and link up with the prepositioned equipment when required.

This approach reduces the amount of heavy equipment that must accompany personnel during the initial stages of an overseas deployment.

The Marine Corps’ official description of Blount Island identifies the command as a central organization responsible for generating, sustaining, modernizing and distributing forward-positioned equipment and supplies.

A real-world example: 22nd MEU equipment transfer

One of the clearest demonstrations of Blount Island’s operational value occurred in May 2026, when the installation supported the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit (Special Operations Capable) during its Caribbean deployment.

On May 5, Marines moved an up-armored MK36 Medium Tactical Vehicle Replacement wrecker ashore at Blount Island using a Navy landing craft utility.

The landing craft departed the San Antonio-class amphibious transport dock USS Fort Lauderdale (LPD 28) and traveled along the St. Johns River to the installation.

The vehicle was unloaded using Blount Island’s sand ramp, allowing the Marines to move the heavy recovery vehicle ashore and continue their operations.

The operation demonstrated how an established waterfront facility can provide an alternative equipment transfer point when conventional landing locations present difficulties.

According to the Marine Corps account published on May 7, Blount Island Command coordinated the landing after the deployed unit requested assistance.

The facility’s protected slipway and sand ramp provided the necessary infrastructure for the movement.

The May operation is separate from Cao’s November visit. It provides an earlier operational example of the installation’s logistics role.

Emergency replacement parts for deployed vehicles

The May equipment transfer was not the only example of Blount Island supporting the 22nd MEU.

During the same Caribbean deployment, the unit required replacement windows for its armored vehicles to meet a force-protection requirement.

Blount Island Command approved the request, while Marine Corps contractors prepared replacement panels from prepositioned stocks for shipment.

Using existing stocks can reduce the time needed to obtain replacement components compared with initiating a new procurement process.

The episode illustrates another important aspect of military logistics: maintaining access to replacement parts can be as important as positioning complete vehicles and other major equipment.

For deployed forces, delays in obtaining essential components can affect equipment availability and operational continuity.

Public information does not specify the number of replacement panels supplied or provide a detailed account of the delivery schedule.

Waterfront infrastructure also supports Navy training

Blount Island’s facilities also serve a training role for Navy personnel involved in expeditionary logistics.

During a separate exercise in late May 2026, sailors assigned to the 2nd Navy Expeditionary Logistics Regiment practiced crane operations, line handling and equipment staging alongside the installation’s workforce.

The exercise involved USNS Red Cloud and Navy causeway ferries, which supported ship-to-shore equipment transfer training.

Experienced Navy veterans working as contracted watercraft masters, engineers and crew members helped guide sailors through vessel movements and crane operations.

These activities address practical requirements associated with moving heavy military equipment between ships and shore facilities.

Successful expeditionary logistics requires coordination among vessel crews, port personnel, maintenance teams and the units receiving equipment. Training in these activities helps personnel maintain the skills needed to support deployments and contingency operations.

Why the Marine Corps needs forward-positioned equipment

The Marine Corps relies on a combination of strategic transportation, maritime access and prepositioned equipment to deploy forces overseas.

Moving personnel and equipment together can create significant transportation demands, particularly when a Marine expeditionary unit must respond quickly to a developing crisis.

Prepositioning addresses part of that challenge by keeping selected equipment and supplies closer to potential operating areas.

Blount Island supports this system through maintenance, storage, equipment preparation and coordination with maritime transportation assets.

Its importance is particularly relevant to expeditionary operations, where Marines may need to move equipment through ports, coastal facilities or temporary landing locations rather than relying exclusively on established commercial infrastructure.

The facility also contributes to equipment readiness between deployments. Prepositioned assets require inspection, maintenance and periodic replacement to ensure they remain suitable for operational use.

This creates a continuing requirement for skilled personnel, industrial facilities, contractors and reliable access to maritime transportation.

The Marine Corps’ historical account traces its maritime prepositioning enterprise to the early 1980s, when equipment and supplies began being positioned aboard ships to support rapid overseas deployments. Blount Island Command was established in 1986 and subsequently became a central organization for maintaining and distributing forward-positioned Marine Corps equipment.

Industrial waterfront capacity remains a readiness requirement

Cao’s visit also placed emphasis on the relationship between maritime infrastructure and the wider U.S. defense industrial base.

During the tour, he highlighted the importance of skilled workers, available industrial space and waterfront access in supporting the nation’s maritime capabilities.

These requirements extend beyond the construction and maintenance of warships.

Military logistics installations need suitable waterfront facilities, storage capacity, heavy-equipment handling infrastructure and maintenance capabilities to support the movement of military assets.

Blount Island brings several of these functions together at one location.

Its operations also demonstrate how Navy and Marine Corps logistics activities depend on civilian contractors and experienced maritime personnel, rather than military personnel alone.

However, the November visit announcement did not disclose new infrastructure contracts, expansion funding, equipment procurement decisions or specific construction milestones.

It therefore provides evidence of continued senior-level attention to the installation’s logistics mission, rather than confirmation of a new modernization program.

For the Marine Corps, maintaining these facilities is part of ensuring that forward-positioned equipment remains available when deployed units need it.

The effectiveness of the wider prepositioning system ultimately depends not only on the equipment held overseas or aboard ships, but also on the industrial facilities and personnel responsible for maintaining, replacing and moving those assets.

TAGGED:Maritime Prepositioningmilitary logisticsU.S. Marine CorpsU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • F-47A Fighter Jet F-47A Fighter Jet
  • China DF-61 Missile China DF-61 Missile
  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Lockheed Martin Introduces C-130J Trainer to Expand Aircrew Training Capacity
  • Royal Navy Launches First Autonomous Squadron for Uncrewed Boat Operations
  • Raytheon Completes Third DeepStrike JR3 Rocket Flight Test for U.S. Army
  • Acting Navy Secretary Tours Blount Island Marine Logistics Hub
  • Defense Logistics Agency Commits $2 Billion to Critical Materials Stockpile

You Might Also Like

F-35 deliveries 2025
Aerospace & AviationDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $43.7 Million F-35 Reprogramming Lab Upgrade Contract

October 29, 2026
HMS Glasgow sea trials
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

UK’s First Type 26 Frigate HMS Glasgow Nears Sea Trials After Major Build Progress

September 7, 2026
Lionfish small unmanned undersea vehicle developed by Huntington Ingalls for U.S. Navy operations
Defense ContractsUnmanned & Underwater Systems

Huntington Ingalls Secures $37M Deal For Lionfish Undersea Drone Production

May 8, 2026
U.S. Navy Virginia-class nuclear-powered attack submarine operating in the Indo-Pacific as Australia prepares to acquire three in-service boats under the AUKUS agreement.
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Australia Moves To Acquire Three Used Virginia-Class Submarines As AUKUS Program Faces Industrial Pressure

May 31, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?