• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $114.6 Million Contract to Redesign F-35 Navigation Systems
Aerospace & AviationDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $114.6 Million Contract to Redesign F-35 Navigation Systems

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: October 24, 2026 4:47 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
10 Min Read
F-35 Lightning II
SHARE

Lockheed Martin has received a $114.63 million U.S. Navy order to redesign two navigation subsystems used by the F-35 Lightning II, addressing obsolete electronic components that could otherwise disrupt aircraft production and long-term support.

Contents
  • Why the F-35 navigation redesign matters
  • Two systems, complementary navigation roles
  • Contract details and funding
  • Where the work will take place
  • Production continuity is the immediate priority
  • What the award does not establish

The order covers engineering, redesign, integration, qualification and testing for the Global Positioning System Electronic Unit and the NAV100 Inertial Navigation System. Work is scheduled to continue through January 2030, according to the contract announcement.

The award is being managed by Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) in Patuxent River, Maryland, and supports F-35 requirements across the U.S. Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and international cooperative program partners.

Why the F-35 navigation redesign matters

The contract addresses a common challenge in long-running military aircraft programs: keeping established electronic systems in production as their original components become difficult or impossible to obtain.

- Advertisement -

Electronic parts can become obsolete long before an aircraft reaches the end of its service life. Manufacturers may discontinue chips, processors or other components, forcing aircraft program offices and suppliers to redesign equipment that still performs its intended function.

  • F-35 Lightning II Fighter Jet

    F-35 Lightning II Fighter Jet

    • Generation: 5th
    • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph / 1,930 km/h)
    • No. of Engines: 1
    • Radar Range: ~150+ km (AN/APG-81 AESA)
    • View Details →
    8.8

    For the F-35, the Navy’s order is intended to replace obsolete components while maintaining the navigation systems’ performance and compatibility with the aircraft’s existing architecture.

    That distinction matters. The announced work is a component-level redesign effort, not confirmation of a new navigation capability or a broader upgrade to the F-35’s avionics suite.

    The contract notice does not identify the specific components being replaced, the original suppliers, or the technical changes planned for either unit. It also does not disclose whether the redesigned systems will introduce additional navigation features.

    Two systems, complementary navigation roles

    The order covers two separate pieces of navigation equipment.

    Global Positioning System Electronic Unit: This unit supports the aircraft’s use of satellite-based positioning information. GPS provides an external reference for determining position and supporting navigation functions, although its availability and reliability can be affected by interference or hostile electronic warfare.

    NAV100 Inertial Navigation System: Inertial navigation uses onboard sensors to estimate an aircraft’s movement and position without depending continuously on an external positioning signal. Such systems complement satellite navigation, particularly when GPS reception is degraded or unavailable.

    The two technologies serve complementary purposes. Satellite navigation provides positioning information from external signals, while inertial navigation allows an aircraft to continue estimating its movement independently between external updates.

    However, the contract announcement does not establish the exact architecture, redundancy arrangements or degraded-navigation performance of these specific F-35 units. Their roles should not be taken as evidence that the redesign will improve resistance to jamming or introduce new operational capabilities.

    The stated objective is to maintain existing performance and compatibility while replacing obsolete electronics.

    Contract details and funding

    The Navy awarded the order to Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. of Fort Worth, Texas, under a previously issued basic ordering agreement.

    Contract value
    $114.63 million
    Expected completion
    January 2030
    Contract number: N0001927F1037
    Basic ordering agreement: N0001924G0010
    Contracting activity: Naval Air Systems Command
    Procurement method: Noncompetitive

    The order uses a cost-plus-fixed-fee structure. Under this arrangement, the government reimburses allowable contract costs and pays a negotiated fixed fee, subject to the terms of the agreement. This structure is commonly used for engineering and development work when the full effort cannot be priced as a straightforward fixed-price production purchase.

    The announced funding is divided among three sources:

    Funding sourceAmount
    Fiscal 2026 Air Force aircraft procurement$46,411,323
    Fiscal 2026 Navy aircraft procurement$46,411,322
    F-35 cooperative program partners$21,807,321
    Total$114,629,966

    The full amount is scheduled to be obligated at the time of award, according to the contract announcement.

    The funding split reflects the joint nature of the F-35 program. Although the aircraft has three U.S. service variants, common equipment and shared development work can affect multiple customers. International cooperative partners also participate in the program and contribute funding for relevant activities.

    • F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

      F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

      • Generation: 5th
      • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph)
      • No. of Engines: 1
      • Radar Range: 150+ miles
      • View Details →
      8.0

      The announcement does not provide a country-by-country breakdown of the partner contribution.

      Where the work will take place

      The engineering effort will be distributed across three U.S. locations.

      LocationShare of work
      El Segundo, California70.1%
      Fort Worth, Texas27.5%
      Clearwater, Florida2.4%

      El Segundo will account for the largest share of the work, with Fort Worth handling more than one-quarter of the effort. Clearwater will account for the remaining portion.

      The contract announcement does not assign specific engineering tasks to individual sites. It would therefore be premature to conclude which location will lead the redesign, integration or qualification phases.

      The planned completion date of January 2030 gives the program several years to carry out the engineering changes and associated testing. The announcement does not provide intermediate milestones, qualification dates or the expected date when redesigned units will enter production.

      Production continuity is the immediate priority

      The central procurement issue is the risk that obsolete components could interfere with F-35 production and sustainment.

      The F-35 program relies on a large international supplier network and a common aircraft architecture across its A, B and C variants. Maintaining component availability is therefore important not only for newly manufactured aircraft, but also for the long-term support of aircraft already in service.

      A redesign can require more than finding a replacement part. Engineers may need to verify electrical interfaces, physical fit, software compatibility, environmental performance and behavior under operating conditions. Qualification testing is intended to establish that the revised equipment meets the required standards before it is accepted for use.

      The Navy’s order explicitly includes redesign, integration, qualification and testing, indicating that the effort extends beyond a simple component substitution.

      Still, the available contract information does not establish that a production stoppage was imminent, that aircraft deliveries had already been delayed, or that the existing navigation systems had suffered a performance failure. The stated purpose is preventive: reducing supply-chain risk and supporting continued production and sustainment.

      What the award does not establish

      Several important details remain undisclosed.

      The contract announcement does not identify the obsolete components, provide a technical comparison between the existing and redesigned units, or specify how many navigation systems will ultimately receive the replacement hardware.

      It also does not announce a new F-35 navigation capability, a change in the aircraft’s operational performance, or an upgrade to its resistance to electronic attack.

      The noncompetitive award identifies the procurement method, but the announcement does not provide a detailed explanation of why a competitive procurement was not used for this order.

      These limits matter when assessing the award. Its confirmed purpose is to maintain the availability and compatibility of existing navigation equipment, rather than introduce a new combat capability.

      For the F-35 program, the practical value will depend on whether the redesigned components can be qualified on schedule and supplied without disrupting aircraft production or ongoing support. The January 2030 completion target provides the published endpoint for the engineering effort, but the announcement does not establish when the first redesigned units will be delivered.

TAGGED:Defense contractsF-35 Lightning IILockheed MartinU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.

Latest Defense Systems

  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft
  • Rafale F5 Fighter Rafale F5 Fighter
  • Tomahawk Block V Missile Tomahawk Block V Missile
  • Tomahawk Block IV Missile Tomahawk Block IV Missile
  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Pratt & Whitney Begins $100 Million Polish Expansion for F-35 Engine Parts
  • Northrop Grumman Wins $43.9 Million Contract for Trident II Rocket Motor Facilities
  • Ukraine Drone Strikes Disrupt Russian Data Centers, Raising Questions About AI Infrastructure Security
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $114.6 Million Contract to Redesign F-35 Navigation Systems
  • Project Agincourt Pushes Pentagon to Speed Up Autonomous Weapons Fielding

You Might Also Like

Pratt & Whitney XA103 adaptive cycle engine for the U.S. Air Force NGAP next-generation propulsion program
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Pratt & Whitney Races To Build Next-Gen Fighter Engine As U.S. Air Force Pushes For Air Dominance

September 7, 2026
F-16 sustainment contract
Defense Contracts

US Air Force Awards $98.8M F-16 Sustainment Contract To BAE Systems

February 23, 2026
Boeing VC-25B Air Force One aircraft undergoing modification work in San Antonio, Texas
Defense Contracts

Boeing Secures $125 Million Contract Modification For VC-25B Air Force One Aircraft

September 12, 2026
U.S. Air Force KC-46A Pegasus aerial refueling tanker flying during operational mission readiness exercise
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

U.S. Air Force Moves To Boost KC-46A Fleet Readiness As Global Tanker Demand Grows

September 12, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?