• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $16.1 Million Contract Modification for F-35 Processor Support
Aerospace & AviationDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $16.1 Million Contract Modification for F-35 Processor Support

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: October 15, 2026 3:42 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
6 Min Read
Lockheed Martin F-35 contract 2026
SHARE

Lockheed Martin has received a $16.11 million contract modification to support testing, cybersecurity modernization and specialized repair infrastructure for the F-35 Lightning II’s Integrated Core Processor, with work scheduled to continue through January 2029.

Contents
  • Air Force and Navy split the funding
  • Why the Integrated Core Processor matters
  • Testing and repair are part of fleet readiness
  • What the award means for F-35 modernization

The award, issued by Naval Air Systems Command (NAVAIR) in Patuxent River, Maryland, adds $16,111,551 to a previously awarded delivery order under the company’s existing basic ordering agreement. The effort is intended to sustain the equipment and engineering capabilities needed to support the fighter’s integrated computing system and maintain fleet operational readiness.

The modification was not competitively procured.

Air Force and Navy split the funding

The contract is funded equally by the U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy through their fiscal 2026 aircraft procurement accounts.

- Advertisement -

The Air Force will provide $8,055,775, while the Navy will contribute $8,055,776. Both amounts are scheduled to be obligated when the award is issued.

Lockheed Martin will perform the work in two locations:

  • McKinney, Texas: 50% of the work.
  • Palm Bay, Florida: 50% of the work.

The contract notice does not identify a separate delivery quantity or disclose the number of test systems, repair assets or facilities that will be upgraded under the modification.

It also does not specify the individual cybersecurity changes covered by the award. The available information therefore does not establish whether the work involves new security software, revised testing procedures, hardware changes or a combination of these activities.

Why the Integrated Core Processor matters

The Integrated Core Processor (ICP) is a central computing component of the F-35’s avionics architecture. It processes information required by the aircraft’s integrated systems, making computing performance and system integration important to the fighter’s continued modernization.

The U.S. Navy’s fiscal 2025 aircraft procurement justification documents describe the broader F-35 Technical Refresh 3 (TR-3) effort as incorporating a new Integrated Core Processor, a panoramic cockpit display and an aircraft memory system to meet the processing, memory and throughput requirements associated with Block 4 modernization.

That program context helps explain why dedicated test capabilities and repair infrastructure remain necessary as the aircraft’s computing architecture evolves.

The latest modification, however, should not be confused with a new processor development award or confirmation that another major F-35 upgrade has entered service. Its stated purpose is to provide avionics testing, cybersecurity modernization, specialized repair infrastructure and related engineering support.

- Advertisement -

The distinction matters because the ability to develop new computing capabilities does not automatically guarantee that the equipment can be tested, maintained and returned to operational use efficiently.

Testing and repair are part of fleet readiness

The contract includes engineering, program management, planning, readiness reviews and introduction-to-service activities alongside the core technical work.

These tasks support the process of preparing equipment and associated capabilities for operational use. Test infrastructure can help engineers assess whether electronic components and systems function as intended, while specialized repair resources support the diagnosis and restoration of equipment that requires maintenance.

For a complex aircraft such as the F-35, those activities form part of the wider sustainment system that supports operational availability.

NAVAIR’s published description of its Electronic Consolidated Automated Support System illustrates the importance of this maintenance infrastructure. The Navy’s automated test system supports avionics and weapons equipment, including F-35 systems, at shore-based Fleet Readiness Centers and afloat maintenance organizations.

That system is not identified as part of the Lockheed Martin award. Rather, it provides context for the broader role of avionics test equipment in military aircraft maintenance.

Cybersecurity is another stated element of the new work. Because the contract notice does not identify the specific vulnerabilities, systems or security measures involved, it would be premature to attribute the award to a particular cyber threat or newly discovered weakness.

What the award means for F-35 modernization

The $16.11 million modification is a relatively narrow sustainment and support award within the much larger F-35 program. Its importance lies in maintaining the technical infrastructure required to test, repair and support a key computing component as the aircraft continues to receive hardware and software improvements.

The work also involves both U.S. military services. Although the contract does not disclose how individual activities will be divided between Air Force and Navy requirements, the shared funding reflects the program’s use across multiple U.S. services.

The January 2029 completion date establishes the planned end of the work covered by this modification. It does not indicate when a new F-35 capability will become operational or establish a separate milestone for the wider Block 4 program.

For now, the confirmed outcome is continued investment in processor-related test capabilities, cybersecurity modernization and repair support. The contract notice provides no additional performance targets or readiness figures with which to measure the award’s eventual effect on aircraft availability.

TAGGED:F-35 Lightning IILockheed Martinmilitary contractsNaval Air Systems Command
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Latest Defense Systems

  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker
  • YU-20 Tanker YU-20 Tanker
  • China KJ-500 Aircraft China KJ-500 Aircraft
  • SPY-6 Radar SPY-6 Radar
  • Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft
  • SM-3 Block IB Missile SM-3 Block IB Missile
  • USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier
  • M142 HIMARS M142 HIMARS

Recent Compares

  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →
  • F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs
  • Lockheed Martin Taps Avio for ER GMLRS and PrSM Rocket Motor Production
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $16.1 Million Contract Modification for F-35 Processor Support
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $74.3 Million Contract Modification for AN/SLQ-32(V)6 Electronic Warfare Systems
  • Hegseth Says Autonomous Warfare Has Long Been the Pentagon’s End Goal

You Might Also Like

BAE Systems RF countermeasures
Defense Contracts

BAE Systems wins $73.8M Navy contract for RF countermeasures on US and FMS fighters

January 25, 2026
FQ-42A Dark Merlin
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

USAF Awards GA-ASI Production Contract for FQ-42A Dark Merlin Collaborative Combat Aircraft

September 12, 2026
Luxembourg drone detection assets
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

Luxembourg Deploys Additional Detection Assets After Drone Sightings

September 21, 2026
Military Sealift Command contract
Defense Contracts

MSC Awards $759 Million Diesel Engine Sustainment Contract for Global Sealift Fleet

June 4, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?