• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » L3Harris Wins $876 Million Navy Award for Next Generation Jammer Low Band
Cyber & Space DefenseDefense Contracts

L3Harris Wins $876 Million Navy Award for Next Generation Jammer Low Band

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: October 20, 2026 3:32 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
8 Min Read
L3Harris Next Generation Jammer Low Band
L3Harris advances airborne electronic warfare with enhanced jamming capabilities.
SHARE

L3Harris Technologies has received a $876.44 million contract modification from the U.S. Navy to continue engineering and manufacturing development of the Next Generation Jammer Low Band (NGJ-LB), an airborne electronic warfare system intended to improve the EA-18G Growler’s ability to disrupt lower-frequency radar and communications systems.

Contents
  • What the $876.4 million award covers
  • Why the low-band capability matters
  • How NGJ-LB fits into the Navy’s jammer family
  • Development and testing remain central
  • What the award means for the U.S. and Australian fleets

Announced on October 19, 2026, the undefinitized contract modification funds additional equipment, demonstration pods, cybersecurity development, testing and software support. The award advances a program intended to address gaps in the Navy’s airborne electronic attack capability as potential adversaries improve their radar networks and integrated air defenses.

The award does not establish that NGJ-LB has entered operational service. The Navy’s published program information identifies the system as being in the engineering and manufacturing development phase, with further testing required before its operational readiness can be assessed.

What the $876.4 million award covers

L3Harris said the modification supports the next phase of the NGJ-LB engineering and manufacturing development effort. The company identified several areas of work:

- Advertisement -
  • Non-recurring tooling, equipment and associated labor.
  • Delivery of system demonstration test article pods.
  • Additional cybersecurity and system security development.
  • Product and logistics support.
  • Testing, evaluation and software support for the Naval Air Systems Command, known as NAVAIR.

The contract is described as undefinitized, meaning the parties have not yet finalized all contractual terms. The announced amount should therefore be understood as the value associated with the modification, not as evidence that all work has been completed or that the system is ready for deployment. The announcement does not provide a revised operational fielding date.

The award also needs to be distinguished from the program’s earlier development contracts. In December 2020, the Navy awarded L3Harris an approximately $496 million engineering and manufacturing development contract. In August 2024, it awarded a further contract valued at up to $587.4 million for the same program phase, according to NAVAIR. Those figures relate to earlier awards and should not automatically be added to the October 2026 modification as though they constitute a single, fully reconciled program-cost total.

Why the low-band capability matters

The NGJ-LB is designed to address a specific challenge in modern air warfare: the use of lower-frequency radar systems to detect, track or support the engagement of aircraft operating near defended airspace.

The Navy’s EA-18G Growler performs airborne electronic attack, using electronic warfare equipment to interfere with adversary radar and communications. Such operations can support strike aircraft by complicating an air defense network’s ability to detect, track and coordinate engagements against incoming forces.

The NGJ-LB is intended to extend this mission into lower-frequency portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. It forms part of a broader Next Generation Jammer family designed to augment and eventually replace the legacy AN/ALQ-99 Tactical Jamming System on the Growler.

Lower-frequency radar is relevant to counter-stealth operations because some radar configurations can detect aircraft with reduced radar signatures under particular conditions. However, detection does not necessarily mean a radar can maintain a sufficiently precise track to support a weapon engagement. Performance depends on the radar’s design, operating environment, signal processing and the characteristics of the target.

Electronic attack can complicate that process, but jamming effectiveness is not universal. It depends on factors including frequency coverage, signal processing, antenna performance, the adversary’s countermeasures and the geometry of an engagement. Public information does not establish how effectively NGJ-LB will perform against specific operational radar systems.

How NGJ-LB fits into the Navy’s jammer family

The Navy is developing the Next Generation Jammer in separate increments to address different frequency bands. The low-band program complements the mid-band system, which has progressed further through acquisition.

- Advertisement -

The separate increments address different parts of the electronic warfare mission rather than serving as direct substitutes for one another. Their combined value will depend on how effectively the Navy integrates them with the aircraft, mission planning systems and other elements of its air operations.

Development and testing remain central

The program has a lengthy acquisition history. NAVAIR records show that the Navy began evaluating existing technologies for NGJ-LB in 2018, followed by the engineering and manufacturing development award in December 2020. The subsequent procurement process included protests and a revised request for proposals in 2023 before the Navy’s August 2024 contract award.

A 2025 Government Accountability Office assessment listed major future milestones for NGJ-LB, including the critical design review, low-rate production decision, operational testing and initial capability, as undetermined in the assessment’s published timeline. That historical assessment does not establish the program’s current milestone status, but it illustrates why a large development award should not be treated as proof of imminent operational fielding.

The latest modification includes system demonstration test article pods and additional software, cybersecurity and testing work. These activities are important because an airborne electronic warfare pod must function within the aircraft’s electrical, aerodynamic, software and mission-system constraints. Its performance also has to be evaluated under representative operating conditions.

Cybersecurity work is particularly relevant to a software-intensive electronic warfare system. Protecting system software and interfaces helps preserve the integrity of mission functions and supports secure updates as threats and operational requirements change. L3Harris has not publicly disclosed the specific cybersecurity vulnerabilities or development tasks covered by this award.

The company says testing will continue in support of the Navy’s delivery schedule. However, the October 19 announcement does not provide a new date for initial operational capability, a revised production schedule or a confirmed fleet deployment date.

What the award means for the U.S. and Australian fleets

The United States and Australia have a shared interest in the program. NAVAIR identified NGJ-LB as a cooperative effort involving the U.S. Department of Defense and Australia’s Department of Defence, with the system intended to support both the U.S. Navy and Royal Australian Air Force.

For both services, the operational objective is to improve airborne electronic attack against increasingly capable radar and communications networks. The capability could support strike operations by making it harder for adversaries to maintain an effective air defense picture, although the actual effect will depend on demonstrated system performance and the threats encountered.

The industrial implications are more immediate than any unverified claim about combat effectiveness. The award funds further engineering, demonstration equipment, testing and technical support at a stage when the program still has development work to complete.

The next meaningful indicators will be evidence of successful system testing, progress through the Navy’s acquisition milestones and an official schedule for operational introduction. Until those details become available, the $876.4 million modification is best understood as a substantial investment in continued development, not confirmation that the Growler’s low-band jamming capability is already operational.

TAGGED:EA-18G GrowlerElectronic WarfareL3HarrisU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Latest Defense Systems

  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet
  • Spirit UAS Spirit UAS
  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb
  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • L3Harris Wins $876 Million Navy Award for Next Generation Jammer Low Band
  • Enlighten IT Consulting Wins $332.8 Million Air Force Contract for Joint Cyber Architecture
  • Marine Corps Redesignates First Battalion as Medium Missile Unit
  • Four Salvadoran Air Force Members Missing After Gang Ambush in Haiti
  • Russian Fighter Jets in 2026: Su-57, Su-35, Su-30 and MiG-41 Compared

You Might Also Like

U.S. military AI systems displayed in a command center highlighting cybersecurity and sleeper agent risks
Cyber & Space Defense

Pentagon Races To Address AI Sleeper Agent Threat Inside Military Systems

May 11, 2026
Saab Sirius Compact L24R passive electronic warfare sensor displayed during AOC EW Europe symposium in Helsinki
AI & Electronic WarfareCyber & Space Defense

Saab Unveils Sirius Compact L24R To Counter Growing Electronic Warfare Threats

May 19, 2026
GPS III satellite constellation
Cyber & Space DefenseSpace Assets & Satellites

Space Force Completes GPS III Constellation To Counter Jamming And Spoofing Threats

September 7, 2026
US Space Force missile warning contract
Cyber & Space Defense

US Space Force Awards InDyne $1.1 Billion Contract for Missile Warning and Space Domain Awareness

September 8, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?