• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » F-35B Releases MBDA Meteor Missile From Internal Weapons Bay for First Time
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

F-35B Releases MBDA Meteor Missile From Internal Weapons Bay for First Time

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: November 6, 2026 12:15 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
4 Min Read
F-35B Meteor missile integration
© F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office (Image : MBDA)
SHARE

The F-35B Lightning II has completed its first flight test involving the release of an MBDA Meteor air-to-air missile from its internal weapons bay, advancing a multinational effort to integrate the European weapon onto British and Italian F-35 fighters.

Contents
What the October Test Actually DemonstratedA UK-US Test Team Behind the MilestoneInternal Carriage Preserves the F-35B’s Low-Observable ConfigurationIntegration Timeline Still Points to the Early 2030sWhat the Integration Means for British and Italian F-35 FleetsLive Firing Remains the Next Major Milestone

The test took place on October 7, 2026, at Naval Air Station Patuxent River in Maryland. According to MBDA, the missile separated safely from the aircraft during a developmental jettison trial, providing engineers with data needed for further weapons integration testing.

The milestone was announced by MBDA on November 5. The F-35 Joint Program Office (JPO) also reported the achievement, describing it as the first Meteor release from an F-35B internal weapons bay.

  • F-35B Lightning II Fighter Jet

    F-35B Lightning II Fighter Jet

    • Generation: 5th
    • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph)
    • No. of Engines: 1 (Pratt & Whitney F135-PW-600)
    • Radar Range: 150+ miles
    • View Details →
    8.0

    The test moves the Meteor integration program beyond initial aircraft carriage and ground-based integration work. However, it does not mean the missile has been cleared for operational use on the F-35B. Additional separation testing and live missile firings remain necessary.

    What the October Test Actually Demonstrated

    The October 7 flight focused on the safe separation of Meteor from the F-35B rather than testing the missile’s ability to engage an aerial target.

    During a jettison trial, engineers examine how a weapon leaves the aircraft under flight conditions. This is particularly important for an internally carried missile because the weapon must pass through the aircraft’s weapons-bay environment and clear the surrounding structure without creating an unsafe aerodynamic interaction.

    MBDA reported that the test demonstrated safe separation in a complex aerodynamic environment. The flight also generated information for improving predictive digital models used to assess weapon-release characteristics.

    These models help engineers evaluate how a missile behaves immediately after leaving the aircraft and identify potential separation problems before more demanding flight tests.

    The missile used was a weapon test asset. The October event was not a live firing, and it did not demonstrate an operational interception or validate the missile’s complete flight performance after release.

    The next stage will involve additional release profiles over the coming months. MBDA said the developmental testing campaign will eventually lead to live firings designed to assess both safe separation and missile fly-out performance under different release conditions.

    A UK-US Test Team Behind the Milestone

    The trial involved personnel from the Royal Navy, Royal Air Force and Lockheed Martin working through the F-35 Integrated Test Force (ITF).

    A Royal Navy F-35 test pilot assigned to the UK’s Air and Space Warfare Centre flew the aircraft. The pilot was embedded with the F-35 ITF at Patuxent River, where British and American personnel are conducting integration work.

    The wider program also involves the UK Ministry of Defence, U.S. Department of Defense, Italian Ministry of Defence, MBDA, BAE Systems, Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.

    The division of responsibilities reflects the multinational nature of both the F-35 program and the Meteor weapon development effort. The United States leads the wider F-35 Joint Program Office, while Britain is leading Meteor integration for the F-35B and Italy is sponsoring work on the F-35A.

    • F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

      F-35A Lightning II Fighter Jet

      • Generation: 5th
      • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph)
      • No. of Engines: 1
      • Radar Range: 150+ miles
      • View Details →
      8.0

      This arrangement is intended to extend Meteor compatibility across two F-35 variants used by European partner nations.

      Meteor is a beyond-visual-range air-to-air missile developed through cooperation between the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and Sweden.

      Its main technical distinction is its propulsion system. Unlike conventional air-to-air missiles that typically use an initial rocket boost followed by an unpowered flight phase, Meteor uses a solid-fuel, variable-flow ducted rocket propulsion system to sustain thrust during much of its flight.

      This approach is intended to preserve missile energy during the engagement and provide a larger no-escape zone, the region in which a targeted aircraft has limited ability to evade an incoming missile.

      Meteor also uses an active radar seeker for terminal guidance and a two-way data link that supports communication with the launching aircraft or other networked sources.

      These characteristics are relevant to the F-35’s air-combat role. The fighter’s sensors and network connectivity can provide information for engagements beyond the pilot’s direct visual range, while Meteor adds another weapon option for attacking airborne threats.

      However, the operational benefits will depend on successful integration of the missile, its software, aircraft mission systems and associated targeting functions.

      Internal Carriage Preserves the F-35B’s Low-Observable Configuration

      The internal weapons bay is an important part of the F-35’s low-observable design.

      Carrying weapons internally reduces the radar signature associated with external stores and avoids the additional aerodynamic drag created by external missile pylons.

      • F-35 Lightning II Fighter Jet

        F-35 Lightning II Fighter Jet

        • Generation: 5th
        • Maximum Speed: Mach 1.6 (1,200 mph / 1,930 km/h)
        • No. of Engines: 1
        • Radar Range: ~150+ km (AN/APG-81 AESA)
        • View Details →
        8.8

        For the F-35B, integrating Meteor into the internal weapons bay is particularly relevant because the aircraft is designed for short takeoff and vertical landing operations from aircraft carriers and other suitable operating locations.

        An internally carried long-range air-to-air missile would allow the aircraft to retain its low-observable configuration while expanding its available weapon options.

        This is an important distinction from simply carrying Meteor externally during an early test flight. Initial aircraft carriage establishes that a weapon can be transported by the platform, but internal separation trials address the more demanding question of whether it can safely leave the aircraft’s enclosed weapons bay.

        The October test therefore represents a specific engineering milestone, not completion of the entire integration process.

        Integration Timeline Still Points to the Early 2030s

        The latest test follows several earlier steps in the Meteor-F-35 integration campaign.

        In February 2025, the Royal Air Force announced that a U.S. Marine Corps F-35B had conducted the first test flights carrying an inert Meteor missile. Those sorties took place at Naval Air Station Patuxent River and collected environmental data for the integration program.

        In December 2025, MBDA and Lockheed Martin reported successful ground-based integration testing involving Meteor and the F-35A. The work was conducted with the F-35 Joint Program Office and formed part of Italy’s effort to integrate the weapon onto that aircraft variant.

        The British government subsequently provided a clearer indication of the expected operational timeline.

        In a written parliamentary answer published on April 20, 2026, Defence Minister Luke Pollard confirmed that Meteor integration with the F-35B was being driven by the U.S.-led Lightning II Joint Program Office. The government said integration testing was continuing and that the estimated timeline for in-service capability remained the early 2030s.

        The October jettison test adds another step to that schedule, but no revised operational entry date has been announced.

        What the Integration Means for British and Italian F-35 Fleets

        For the United Kingdom, Meteor integration addresses an important requirement for its carrier-based F-35B fleet.

        The F-35B operates alongside the Royal Navy’s Queen Elizabeth-class aircraft carriers and provides the UK’s principal carrier-based fixed-wing combat aircraft capability. Adding an internally carried long-range air-to-air missile would expand its options for engaging airborne threats while retaining the aircraft’s low-observable configuration.

        The Royal Air Force already operates Meteor on its Eurofighter Typhoon fighters. Integrating the missile onto the F-35B would provide another platform for employing the same European-developed weapon.

        Italy’s parallel F-35A integration effort also has implications for interoperability. Both countries could eventually operate Meteor-equipped F-35 aircraft, although the two variants have separate integration campaigns.

        For the wider F-35 partnership, the work demonstrates that the multinational program can accommodate additional weapons developed outside the United States. However, weapon integration requires extensive testing, software development and certification, so compatibility should not be confused with immediate availability across the entire F-35 fleet.

        Live Firing Remains the Next Major Milestone

        The October 2026 trial establishes that a Meteor test asset can safely separate from an F-35B’s internal weapons bay under the conditions examined.

        The remaining work is more demanding. Engineers must evaluate additional release conditions, validate the missile’s flight after separation and conduct live firings before the weapon can progress toward operational clearance.

        The early 2030s remains the publicly stated UK target for F-35B Meteor in-service capability. Until the remaining developmental and integration activities are completed, the missile should be regarded as undergoing testing rather than available for operational employment on the aircraft.

        The distinction matters: the F-35B has now demonstrated another important part of the integration process, but the full combat capability has yet to be established.

TAGGED:air-to-air missilesF-35 Lightning IIMBDA MeteorUK defense
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • China DF-61 Missile China DF-61 Missile
  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • India Conducts Flight Test of Indigenous Pralay Quasi-Ballistic Missile
  • F-35B Releases MBDA Meteor Missile From Internal Weapons Bay for First Time
  • China Tests Guangjian Laser Weapons Against Multiple Drone Swarms in Gobi Desert
  • China’s DF-61 ICBM Enters Routine PLA Rocket Force Training
  • Navy Awards $11.26 Million Contract for Undersea Acoustic Warfare Research

You Might Also Like

Collaborative Combat Aircraft program
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

USAF Collaborative Combat Aircraft Program Advances Through Deliberate Weapons Integration Strategy

September 8, 2026
NASA X-59 test flights
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

NASA X-59 Test Flights Signal New Era Of Quiet Supersonic Aviation

September 7, 2026
Airbus Saab partnership
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military AircraftStealth Technology

Airbus Moves To Partner With Saab As Franco-German FCAS Fighter Program Unravels

September 7, 2026
Redwire Penguin Mk3 tactical uncrewed aircraft system prepared for NATO reconnaissance operations
Defense ContractsDrones & UAVs

Redwire Secures NATO Deal For Penguin Mk3 Tactical Drone Systems

October 14, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?