• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » General Dynamics Secures $66.1M Deal For Virginia-Class Submarine Test Systems
Defense ContractsNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

General Dynamics Secures $66.1M Deal For Virginia-Class Submarine Test Systems

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: May 8, 2026 12:25 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
General Dynamics Mission Systems supporting U.S. Navy Virginia-class submarine testing operations under new $66 million contract
SHARE

Executive Summary:
The U.S. Navy awarded General Dynamics Mission Systems a $66.1 million contract to continue development of the Data Acquisition and Retrieval System for Virginia and Columbia-class submarine testing.
The five-year agreement supports undersea warfare modernization and long-term strategic submarine readiness through 2031.

General Dynamics Navy Contract Supports Submarine Modernization

General Dynamics Mission Systems has secured a $66,176,980 U.S. Navy contract to continue development work tied to the service’s next-generation submarine programs.

Contents
General Dynamics Navy Contract Supports Submarine ModernizationWhy The Contract MattersContract Details And Funding BreakdownSBIR Phase III Sole Source StructureStrategic Importance Of Undersea Warfare

The award, announced by the U.S. Department of Defense, covers continued Small Business Innovative Research (SBIR) Phase III development of the Data Acquisition and Retrieval System (DARS). The technology supports testing operations linked to both the Virginia-class submarine and Columbia-class submarine programs.

The contract was awarded to General Dynamics Mission Systems Inc., based in Manassas, under an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity structure combining cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-only elements.

According to the Pentagon announcement, the ordering period will run for five years, with work expected to continue through May 2031.

- Advertisement -

Why The Contract Matters

The General Dynamics Navy contract highlights the Pentagon’s continued emphasis on undersea warfare modernization as strategic competition intensifies in both the Atlantic and Indo-Pacific theaters.

The Virginia-class submarine fleet remains one of the Navy’s most important fast-attack submarine programs, providing intelligence collection, anti-submarine warfare, strike missions, and special operations support. Meanwhile, the Columbia-class program is designed to replace the aging Ohio-class ballistic missile submarines that form the sea-based leg of the U.S. nuclear triad.

  • Virginia-class SSN-774 Submarine

    Virginia-class SSN-774 Submarine

    • Power: Nuclear (S9G Reactor)
    • Stealth: Advanced acoustic quieting, anechoic coating
    • Weapons: Mk-48 torpedoes, Tomahawk missiles
    • Sensors: Large Aperture Bow Sonar, TB-29 arrays
    • View Details →
    8.0

    Testing infrastructure and data acquisition systems are critical to both programs. These systems gather operational, engineering, and performance data during submarine trials and evaluation exercises. The ability to rapidly collect and analyze this information supports reliability, safety, and mission readiness.

    The Navy’s investment also reflects the increasing complexity of modern submarine systems. As platforms become quieter, more connected, and more software-driven, advanced test and telemetry systems become essential for validation and lifecycle sustainment.

    Contract Details And Funding Breakdown

    The contract was issued by the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport, which serves as the contracting activity.

    Work under the contract will primarily take place in Groton, accounting for roughly 80% of total effort. Additional work locations include:

    • Newport
    • Port Canaveral
    • Andros Island

    Initial funding obligated under the first task order totals more than $1.1 million and includes:

    • Fiscal 2026 Shipbuilding and Conversion Navy funds: $567,377
    • Fiscal 2023 Shipbuilding and Conversion Navy funds: $369,216
    • Fiscal 2024 Shipbuilding and Conversion Navy funds: $174,487

    The Pentagon stated that none of the obligated funds will expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

    SBIR Phase III Sole Source Structure

    The General Dynamics Navy contract was awarded as an SBIR Phase III sole-source agreement and was not competitively procured through SAM.gov.

    The Department of Defense cited statutory authority under 10 U.S. Code 3204(a)(5), implemented through Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-5, which permits certain contracts authorized by statute to proceed without full competition.

    • Virginia-class SSN-774 Submarine

      Virginia-class SSN-774 Submarine

      • Power: Nuclear (S9G Reactor)
      • Stealth: Advanced acoustic quieting, anechoic coating
      • Weapons: Mk-48 torpedoes, Tomahawk missiles
      • Sensors: Large Aperture Bow Sonar, TB-29 arrays
      • View Details →
      8.0

      SBIR Phase III contracts typically transition technologies developed under earlier research phases into operational deployment or sustained production support. In this case, the Navy appears to be leveraging an already established capability supporting submarine test infrastructure.

      Strategic Importance Of Undersea Warfare

      The timing of the award aligns with broader U.S. efforts to maintain undersea dominance amid rising naval competition from both China and Russia.

      The Navy has repeatedly emphasized the strategic importance of attack and ballistic missile submarines in future conflict scenarios. Virginia-class submarines continue to deploy globally, while Columbia-class boats are expected to become the backbone of U.S. strategic deterrence for decades.

      Reliable test systems play a less visible but highly important role in ensuring those platforms perform as intended under operational conditions. Contracts like this one support the broader ecosystem behind submarine readiness, modernization, and long-term sustainment.

TAGGED:Columbia-class submarinesGeneral DynamicsSBIR Phase IIIU.S. NavyVirginia-class submarines
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • General Atomics to Supply Components for U.S. Army and Navy Hypersonic Weapons
  • Lockheed Martin Tests Mk21A Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel ICBM
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract
  • Pentagon Prepares Review of Military Legal System and JAG Corps
  • U.S. and Colombia Launch Southern Vanguard 2027 Exercise

You Might Also Like

M1147 Advanced Multi-Purpose round
Defense ContractsTanks & Armored Vehicles

Northrop Grumman Secures $885 Million Deal For M1147 Advanced Multi-Purpose Abrams Tank Ammunition

June 23, 2026
F-35C landing on USS John F. Kennedy
Aircraft CarriersNaval & Maritime

U.S. Navy Conducts First F-35C Landing on USS John F. Kennedy

October 14, 2026
U.S. shipbuilding budget 2027
Defense Budgets & PolicyPolicy & Strategy

U.S. Navy Races To Expand Fleet As $65.8 Billion Shipbuilding Plan Unveiled

April 5, 2026
C 130J training systems contract
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Secures 130M Contract for RAAF C 130J Training and Maintenance Systems

January 28, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?