• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » U.S. Navy Deploys Two Nuclear Attack Submarines Near Guam As Indo-Pacific Tensions Rise
Naval & MaritimeSubmarines

U.S. Navy Deploys Two Nuclear Attack Submarines Near Guam As Indo-Pacific Tensions Rise

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 12, 2026 6:40 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
3 Min Read
U.S. Navy nuclear attack submarines Guam
Image Source : dvidshub
SHARE

U.S. Navy Nuclear Attack Submarines Conduct Forward Deployment Exercise Near Guam

The U.S. Navy deployed two Los Angeles-class nuclear attack submarines near Guam in a rare coordinated surface exercise that underscores forward-deployed undersea capabilities in the Indo-Pacific theater. USS Asheville (SSN 758) and USS Annapolis (SSN 760) surfaced together on December 17, 2025, conducting a tightly controlled photo exercise with aviation support from Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25.

Contents
U.S. Navy Nuclear Attack Submarines Conduct Forward Deployment Exercise Near GuamLos Angeles-Class Submarines: Capabilities and Strategic ValueStrike and Sea Denial CapabilitiesForward Deployment AdvantagesCoordinated Operations: Why Surface Two Submarines Together?Aviation Support and SafetyOperational MessagingIndo-Pacific Strategic ContextGuam’s Strategic PositionDeterrence Through Controlled VisibilityPlatform Evolution and Future CapabilitiesUndersea Warfare in a Contested EnvironmentConclusion
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

According to Commander, Submarine Squadron 15, the operation demonstrated coordination between forward-deployed undersea platforms and naval aviation assets stationed at Naval Base Guam. The exercise represents an uncommon operational posture for attack submarines designed for stealth operations, offering a deliberate signal of readiness in a region where military response timelines continue to compress.

Los Angeles-Class Submarines: Capabilities and Strategic Value

USS Asheville and USS Annapolis are improved Los Angeles-class attack submarines, representing late-production variants with enhanced acoustic quieting and upgraded combat systems. The class displaces approximately 6,900 tons submerged, measures 360 feet in length, and operates at speeds exceeding 25 knots with diving capabilities beyond 800 feet.

  • Los Angeles-class Submarine (SSN-688)

    Los Angeles-class Submarine (SSN-688)

    • Power: Nuclear (S6G reactor)
    • Stealth: Quieted hull, anechoic coatings
    • Weapons: Mk 48 torpedoes, Tomahawk missiles
    • Sensors: BQQ-5/BQQ-10 sonar suites
    • View Details →
    8.3

    Strike and Sea Denial Capabilities

    Each submarine carries 12 Vertical Launch System (VLS) tubes for Tomahawk cruise missiles, providing land-attack capabilities without consuming torpedo-room capacity. The Navy fields Tomahawk Block IV and Block V variants with ranges approaching 900 nautical miles, incorporating GPS guidance, terrain-matching navigation, and two-way satellite communications for in-flight retargeting.

    • Tomahawk Cruise Missile

      Tomahawk Cruise Missile

      • Guidance System: GPS / INS / Terrain Contour Matching
      • Maximum Speed: Mach 0.74–0.85 (subsonic)
      • Launch Compatibility: Surface Ships, Submarines
      • Warhead Technology: High Explosive, Penetrator
      • View Details →
      8.3
      (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

      The submarines retain full torpedo-tube launch capability for Mk 48 ADCAP heavyweight torpedoes, designed to defeat deep-diving nuclear submarines and surface combatants through wire-guided and active-passive acoustic homing. This dual-payload configuration enables mission flexibility across intelligence collection, sea denial, and precision strike operations.

      Forward Deployment Advantages

      Naval Base Guam’s strategic location provides critical forward positioning for submarine operations. The facility enables faster rearmament, maintenance, and deployment cycles compared to continental U.S. bases, maintaining persistent undersea presence across the Western Pacific’s vast operational areas.

      Submarine Squadron 15 operates from Polaris Point as a forward-deployed force supporting free and open Indo-Pacific operations. The squadron includes multiple Los Angeles-class boats alongside newer Virginia-class submarines, providing layered undersea capabilities across anti-submarine warfare, intelligence gathering, and strike missions.

      Coordinated Operations: Why Surface Two Submarines Together?

      Submarine doctrine emphasizes stealth, separation, and operational ambiguity. Coordinated surface operations with two attack submarines represent exceptional circumstances, typically limited to permissive waters during training, transit coordination, or deliberate signaling.

      Aviation Support and Safety

      The MH-60S Sea Hawk from HSC-25 provided communications relay, search-and-rescue coverage, and airborne oversight during close-quarters maneuvering. While MH-60S helicopters lack the anti-submarine warfare capabilities of MH-60R variants, they maintain critical medical evacuation readiness and surface coordination functions for forward-deployed submarine operations.

      • MH-60S Seahawk Helicopter

        MH-60S Seahawk Helicopter

        • Advanced Avionics: Digital cockpit, night vision compatible
        • High Maneuverability: Optimized for shipboard operations
        • Multi-role Capability: Logistics, SAR, combat support
        • Superior Survivability: Ballistic tolerance, countermeasures
        • View Details →
        8.0

        Guam-based helicopter squadrons provide continuous SAR and medevac posture across the 7th Fleet area of operations, making them natural aviation partners when submarines conduct controlled evolutions near high-traffic sea lanes.

        Operational Messaging

        The exercise signals several operational realities. First, multiple attack submarines operate from forward bases with coordinated procedures and safety protocols. Second, submarine forces can surge from forward hubs rather than relying on trans-Pacific deployments. Third, even legacy improved Los Angeles-class boats maintain modern Tomahawk strike capabilities and credible sea denial effects.

        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

        Indo-Pacific Strategic Context

        The deployment occurs against a backdrop of regional security challenges including territorial disputes, military modernization programs, and contested sea lanes across the South China Sea and Western Pacific. U.S. Navy leadership has consistently emphasized forward presence as central to deterrence strategy and alliance commitments.

        Guam’s Strategic Position

        Guam’s geographic location provides proximity to potential contingency areas while maintaining sufficient distance for sustained operations. The island serves as a critical logistics node, enabling faster maintenance cycles and reducing the visible logistics footprint that accompanies surface combatant operations.

        Forward deployment from Guam allows submarines to maintain station times, conduct intelligence collection, and provide strike options across multiple operational arcs without revealing intent through trans-oceanic transits.

        Deterrence Through Controlled Visibility

        The exercise represents deterrence through limited transparency—using rare surface-level operations to communicate undersea readiness while submarines remain among the hardest targets to detect once submerged. In a region defined by long-range sensors, missile salvo exchanges, and contested logistics, the Navy demonstrated that forward undersea forces are armed, trained, and coordinated for rapid response.

        Platform Evolution and Future Capabilities

        While Los Angeles-class submarines represent mature technology, continuous modernization maintains combat relevance. Tomahawk Block V incorporates navigation upgrades and structures future variants including Maritime Strike Tomahawk with anti-ship seeker capabilities and Joint Multiple Effects Warhead Systems for harder target sets.

        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

        The submarines’ combat systems receive regular updates maintaining compatibility with fleet networks and enabling dynamic targeting against mobile threats. Combined with Mk 48 ADCAP torpedoes designed to defeat modern countermeasures, Los Angeles-class boats retain credible lethality against both undersea and surface threats.

        Undersea Warfare in a Contested Environment

        Modern undersea operations require coordination across multiple domains. Attack submarines work distributed across operational areas using deconfliction measures that preserve acoustic advantage while enabling synchronized effects. Surface exercises like the December event rehearse procedures, demonstrate capabilities, and validate coordination between undersea platforms and supporting aviation assets.

        The Navy’s approach balances operational security with strategic messaging—submarines survive through stealth and ambiguity, but controlled visibility serves deterrence when adversaries need reminders of forward-deployed capabilities and operational readiness.

        (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

        Conclusion

        The deployment of USS Asheville and USS Annapolis near Guam demonstrates U.S. Navy undersea force posture in the Indo-Pacific. Through forward basing, coordinated training, and modern strike capabilities, attack submarines provide persistent deterrence and rapid-response options across the theater.

        As regional security challenges evolve, forward-deployed submarine forces operating from strategically positioned bases like Guam represent critical elements of U.S. maritime strategy—maintaining presence, signaling commitment to allies, and deterring potential adversaries through demonstrated capability and readiness.

TAGGED:Guam deploymentIndo-PacificNaval Readinesssubmarinesundersea warfare
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • TRML-4D Radar TRML-4D Radar
  • F-47A Fighter Jet F-47A Fighter Jet
  • China DF-61 Missile China DF-61 Missile
  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Hensoldt Targets €10 Billion in Annual Revenue by 2035, Doubles TRML-4D Radar Capacity
  • Somalia’s Reported JF-17 Deal Raises Questions Over Airpower and Regional Security
  • Navy Awards General Dynamics Subsidiary $20 Million Undersea Warfare Research Contract
  • U.S. Air Force Awards $26 Million Contract for Flyways AI Air Operations Software
  • Hegseth Orders Major Overhaul of U.S. Military Education System

You Might Also Like

HMS Duncan deployment
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

UK Weighs Deployment Of HMS Duncan Destroyer To Protect Cyprus From Iranian Drone And Missile Threats

September 7, 2026
North Korean leader inspecting a newly unveiled nuclear-capable warship during a military ceremony at a naval shipyard.
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

North Korea Moves To Deploy Nuclear-Armed Warship As Regional Naval Tensions Rise

May 11, 2026
Naval Group FDI frigate underway, representing Sweden's planned Luleå-class air defense frigates.
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Naval Group Secures $5 Billion Deal For Four Swedish FDI Frigates

September 7, 2026
Malaysia K-SAAM missiles
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Malaysia Moves To Procure K-SAAM Missiles As Royal Navy Upgrades LMS Batch 2 Fleet

September 12, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?