• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins 9.5 Million Navy Contract for Submarine Electronic Warfare Support
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins 9.5 Million Navy Contract for Submarine Electronic Warfare Support

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 10:20 pm
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
Lockheed Martin submarine contract
Image source: dvidshub
SHARE

Lockheed Martin submarine electronic warfare systems are set to receive continued engineering support under a new U.S. Navy contract modification valued at 9.5 million dollars. The award, announced by Naval Sea Systems Command, supports electronic warfare capabilities on both new construction and in service U.S. Navy submarines, reinforcing long term undersea warfare readiness.

Contents
Contract Details and ScopeImportance of Submarine Electronic WarfareSupport for New and In Service SubmarinesLockheed Martin Role in Undersea WarfareBudget Context and Navy ProcurementElectronic Warfare and Future Naval StrategyIndustry and Program StabilityOutlook
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The contract modification was awarded to Lockheed Martin Corp. in Syracuse, New York, under an existing indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity agreement. Work will continue through February 2027 and will be funded with fiscal year 2026 Navy procurement funds.

Contract Details and Scope

The U.S. Navy awarded Lockheed Martin a 9.5 million cost plus incentive fee and cost contract modification under delivery order N00024-25-F-6260. The delivery order falls under a broader indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contract identified as N00024-25-D-6211.

According to the Navy, the modification exercises contract options for engineering support tied to submarine electronic warfare systems. These systems are used across the Navy submarine fleet, including both newly built platforms and submarines already in operational service.

- Advertisement -

Work under the contract will be performed in Syracuse, New York. The Navy expects all work to be completed by February 2027.

Fiscal year 2026 other procurement Navy funds totaling 4,867,641 dollars will be obligated at the time of award. The Navy confirmed these funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

Naval Sea Systems Command in Washington, D.C. is listed as the contracting activity.

Importance of Submarine Electronic Warfare

Submarine electronic warfare systems play a central role in modern undersea operations. These systems allow submarines to detect, classify, and respond to electromagnetic threats, including radar, communications signals, and hostile sensing systems.

Electronic warfare capabilities are increasingly important as potential adversaries invest in advanced sensors, networked maritime surveillance, and multi domain command systems. For U.S. Navy submarines, maintaining reliable and adaptable electronic warfare systems is critical for survivability and mission success.

Lockheed Martin submarine electronic warfare systems support situational awareness, threat warning, and countermeasure employment. Engineering support contracts like this one help ensure these systems remain effective as threat environments evolve.

Support for New and In Service Submarines

The Navy confirmed that the contract covers both new construction submarines and submarines already in service. This approach allows electronic warfare systems to remain consistent across the fleet while also supporting upgrades and refinements over time.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

New construction submarines, including future Virginia class boats, rely on advanced electronic warfare systems from the earliest design stages. Engineering support helps integrate sensors, processors, and software into complex combat systems.

- Advertisement -

For in service submarines, engineering work supports system sustainment, updates, and technical improvements. This helps the Navy extend service life and maintain operational relevance without costly platform replacements.

Lockheed Martin Role in Undersea Warfare

Lockheed Martin has a long standing role in U.S. Navy undersea warfare programs. The company supplies electronic warfare systems, combat system components, sensors, and integration services for submarines and surface ships.

The Syracuse, New York facility is a key hub for Lockheed Martin undersea and electronic warfare activities. It supports engineering, production, and lifecycle sustainment work for Navy customers.

By securing this contract modification, Lockheed Martin reinforces its position as a trusted supplier of submarine electronic warfare technology and support services.

Budget Context and Navy Procurement

The funding for this contract comes from fiscal year 2026 other procurement Navy accounts. These funds are typically used to support systems, equipment, and upgrades that fall outside standard shipbuilding or weapons procurement lines.

The Navy’s decision to obligate funds that do not expire at the end of the fiscal year provides program stability. It allows engineering work to proceed without annual funding disruptions, which is important for long term technical support efforts.

Defense contracts structured as cost plus incentive fee arrangements are common for complex engineering tasks. They allow the Navy to manage technical risk while encouraging performance and cost control.

Electronic Warfare and Future Naval Strategy

Electronic warfare is a growing focus within U.S. naval strategy, particularly in contested maritime regions. Submarines remain one of the Navy’s most survivable and flexible assets, and their effectiveness depends heavily on electronic awareness and control of the electromagnetic spectrum.

As adversaries improve anti submarine warfare sensors and tracking networks, U.S. submarines must rely on advanced electronic warfare systems to remain undetected and effective.

Engineering support contracts such as this one help the Navy adapt existing systems to new threats while preparing for future platform upgrades.

Industry and Program Stability

While the contract value is modest compared to major shipbuilding awards, it reflects steady investment in critical support functions. Engineering services often determine how well advanced systems perform over time.

For industry, these contracts provide continuity for skilled engineering teams and preserve technical knowledge within the defense industrial base.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

For the Navy, sustained engineering support reduces risk and helps ensure that electronic warfare systems remain aligned with operational needs.

Outlook

The Lockheed Martin submarine electronic warfare contract modification underscores the Navy’s continued focus on undersea dominance and electromagnetic spectrum control. With work scheduled through early 2027, the program supports near and mid term fleet readiness.

As the Navy modernizes its submarine force, electronic warfare engineering will remain a priority area for investment and industry collaboration.

TAGGED:Defense contractsElectronic WarfareLockheed MartinSubmarine WarfareU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • General Atomics to Supply Components for U.S. Army and Navy Hypersonic Weapons
  • Lockheed Martin Tests Mk21A Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel ICBM
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract
  • Pentagon Prepares Review of Military Legal System and JAG Corps
  • U.S. and Colombia Launch Southern Vanguard 2027 Exercise

You Might Also Like

L3Harris airborne sensors contract
Defense Contracts

L3Harris Wins $499.6 Million Missile Defense Agency Airborne Sensors Support Contract

September 7, 2026
Saudi Arabia APKWS-II sale
Defense Contracts

U.S. Approves $1.96 Billion APKWS-II Sale To Saudi Arabia To Expand Air Defense And Precision Strike Capability

September 17, 2026
why aircraft carriers important US Navy
Naval & Maritime

Why Aircraft Carriers Remain the Cornerstone of U.S. Naval Power in 2025

September 2, 2025
Poland ASELSAN electronic warfare systems contract
Global News

Poland Signs $410M Deal with Türkiye’s ASELSAN for Advanced Electronic Warfare

September 8, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?