• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Fluor Marine Propulsion Awarded $1.03 Billion Contract To Sustain U.S. Navy Nuclear Propulsion Enterprise
Defense Contracts

Fluor Marine Propulsion Awarded $1.03 Billion Contract To Sustain U.S. Navy Nuclear Propulsion Enterprise

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 8:20 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
5 Min Read
Fluor Marine Propulsion contract
SHARE

Executive Summary: 

The U.S. Navy has awarded Fluor Marine Propulsion LLC a $1.034 billion contract modification to continue operating and supporting the Naval Nuclear Laboratory, a critical component of America’s nuclear-powered submarine and aircraft carrier fleet. The award reinforces long-term investment in reactor technology, fleet sustainment, and future naval nuclear modernization programs.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The U.S. Department of Defense announced that Fluor Marine Propulsion LLC of Arlington, Virginia, has received a $1,034,700,000 cost-plus-fixed-fee modification to a previously awarded contract supporting naval nuclear propulsion activities at the Naval Nuclear Laboratory (NNL). The award was issued by the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), the organization responsible for managing the U.S. Navy’s nuclear propulsion programs and major maritime acquisition efforts.

Contents
  • Deep Technical & Strategic Context Analysis
  • Contract Breakdown & Details
    • Contract Value
    • Workshare Distribution
    • Funding Breakdown
    • Fiscal Considerations
  • Why This Contract Matters

The modification expands work under contract N00024-18-C-2130 and funds continued operation of the Naval Nuclear Laboratory, which serves as the primary research, development, testing, training, and engineering center for the Navy’s nuclear propulsion enterprise.

Deep Technical & Strategic Context Analysis

The Naval Nuclear Laboratory occupies a unique position within the U.S. defense industrial base. Operated by Fluor Marine Propulsion under the direction of the Naval Reactors program, NNL provides scientific and engineering support for every nuclear-powered submarine and aircraft carrier in service. Its responsibilities span reactor design, fuel development, materials science, safety certification, operational support, and lifecycle sustainment.

The timing of the award is particularly significant as the United States expands production of the Virginia-class attack submarine fleet, advances development of the Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, and prepares for future generations of naval nuclear reactors. The Columbia-class program alone represents one of the Pentagon’s highest modernization priorities, intended to replace the aging Ohio-class strategic deterrent fleet. Sustaining laboratory expertise and reactor engineering capabilities is therefore essential not only for current fleet readiness but also for maintaining the nation’s sea-based nuclear deterrent.

- Advertisement -
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The contract’s cost-plus-fixed-fee structure is commonly used for highly specialized scientific and engineering efforts where technical requirements may evolve during execution. Under this arrangement, allowable costs are reimbursed while a fixed management fee is paid to the contractor. Such contracts help mitigate risk in complex research and development environments where precise project costs cannot always be predicted years in advance.

Contract Breakdown & Details

Contract Value

  • Contractor: Fluor Marine Propulsion LLC
  • Headquarters: Arlington, Virginia
  • Contract Type: Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Modification
  • Contract Number: N00024-18-C-2130
  • Total Modification Value: $1.0347 billion
  • Contracting Authority: Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), Washington, D.C.

Workshare Distribution

The contract work will be performed across the Naval Nuclear Laboratory network:

  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: 47%
  • Schenectady, New York: 45%
  • Idaho Falls, Idaho: 8%

These locations support reactor design activities, nuclear engineering, materials testing, training operations, and advanced research associated with naval propulsion systems.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Funding Breakdown

Funding obligated at the time of award includes:

  • Fiscal Year 2026 Navy Operations & Maintenance: $130,490,278 (56%)
  • Non-Appropriated Funds: $54,500,000 (23%)
  • Fiscal Year 2026 Shipbuilding & Conversion (Navy): $48,000,000 (21%)
  • Fiscal Year 2026 Research, Development, Test & Evaluation: $50,000 (less than 1%)

Fiscal Considerations

  • Total initially obligated funding: Approximately $233 million
  • Funds expiring at the end of FY2026: $130.49 million in Operations and Maintenance appropriations

Why This Contract Matters

While the award does not directly procure submarines, aircraft carriers, or reactor hardware, it supports the technical backbone that enables the U.S. Navy’s nuclear fleet to operate safely and effectively. Every reactor plant aboard a Virginia-class attack submarine, Columbia-class ballistic missile submarine, Nimitz-class carrier, and Gerald R. Ford-class carrier relies on engineering expertise generated and maintained through the Naval Nuclear Laboratory.

The contract also underscores continued federal investment in preserving a highly specialized workforce of nuclear engineers, physicists, materials scientists, and reactor specialists. As strategic competition intensifies and demand for undersea deterrence capabilities grows, maintaining this knowledge base is increasingly viewed as a national security priority.

TAGGED:Defense contractsNaval Nuclear PropulsionU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet
  • Spirit UAS Spirit UAS
  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb
  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Department of War and Lockheed Martin Sign 10-Year F-35 Agreement With $7 Billion Investment Commitment
  • Pentagon Approves Active Denial System for Potential U.S. Southern Border Use
  • U.S. Air Force Plans Larger F-35 Role in 1,509-Aircraft Fighter Fleet
  • Raytheon Wins Two-Year Extension for AN/TPY-2 Radar Support
  • Space Force Selects Northrop Grumman, True Anomaly for New Orbital Reconnaissance Satellites

You Might Also Like

BAE Systems Türkiye Typhoon contract
Defense Contracts

BAE Systems Secures Türkiye Typhoon Support And Training Contract In Major Eurofighter Boost

March 26, 2026
New Zealand MH-60R Seahawk order
Defense ContractsNaval & Maritime

New Zealand Signs Deal for Five MH-60R Seahawk Helicopters

October 20, 2026
General Dynamics Virginia-class submarine contract
Defense Contracts

General Dynamics Wins $99.3M Virginia-Class Submarine Parts Contract

September 17, 2026
Lockheed Martin counter UAS
Aerospace & AviationDrones & UAVs

Lockheed Martin Races To Expand Counter UAS Capability With $25 Million Fortem Technologies Investment

April 22, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?