• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » U S Army Picks Israeli Tamir Interceptor For IFPC INC 2 Cruise Missile Defense Program
Military & OrdnanceMissile Defense Systems

U S Army Picks Israeli Tamir Interceptor For IFPC INC 2 Cruise Missile Defense Program

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 8:00 pm
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
U S Army IFPC INC 2 interceptor
Image : Israeli MoD
SHARE

The U S Army has selected an Israeli Tamir interceptor concept for Phase 1 of its Indirect Fire Protection Capability Increment 2 (IFPC INC 2) second interceptor effort, broadening options for defending fixed and forward sites against cruise missiles, drones, and other aerial threats.

Contents
IFPC INC 2 Cruise Missile Defense Gets New CompetitorIFPC INC 2 Context And MissionWhy Tamir Matters To The ArmyIndustrial And Supply Chain ConsiderationsNext Steps And Program Timeline
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

IFPC INC 2 Cruise Missile Defense Gets New Competitor

Rafael Systems Global Sustainment confirmed it has been chosen by the Army’s SHIELD Project Office to propose an Iron Dome derived Tamir interceptor for the IFPC INC 2 second interceptor competition. The program seeks a missile that can operate in an integrated Army air and missile defense architecture to defeat subsonic and low-altitude cruise missiles and unmanned aircraft systems.

The Tamir based design stems from the Iron Dome’s battle-proven interceptor family, known for all-weather performance, electro-optical guidance, and a proximity fused blast warhead. In U S Army use the concept will be adapted to connect with the Integrated Air and Missile Defense Battle Command System and the Sentinel radar under IFPC INC 2’s open architecture.

IFPC INC 2 Context And Mission

IFPC INC 2 is the Army’s mobile ground-based system intended to fill a mid-tier defense gap between short range systems and higher tier long range assets like Patriot and THAAD. The IFPC INC 2 launcher design integrates with IBCS and Sentinel sensors to allow multiple interceptors and provide 360 degree coverage against cruise missiles, UAVs, rockets, artillery, and mortars.

- Advertisement -
  • THAAD Missile Defense System

    THAAD Missile Defense System

    • Maximum Range: 200 km
    • Maximum Altitude: 150 km
    • Radar Detection Range: 1,000 km (AN/TPY-2)
    • Missile Speed: Mach 8
    • View Details →
    8.0

    The first interceptor fielded under IFPC INC 2 has been the ground-launched AIM-9X Sidewinder paired with the Enduring Shield launcher. That combination offers a rapid deployable option but is not optimized for higher-performance cruise missile threats. The addition of a second interceptor aimed at tougher mission sets is a key program driver.

    • Patriot PAC-3 Missile Defense System

      Patriot PAC-3 Missile Defense System

      • Maximum Range: 160 km
      • Maximum Altitude: 24 km
      • Radar Detection Range: 150–300 km
      • Missile Speed: Mach 4.5
      • View Details →
      8.0
      (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

      Why Tamir Matters To The Army

      The decision to select a Tamir based design for Phase 1 reflects the Army’s interest in leveraging a mature missile family with in service combat data. The Iron Dome system’s Tamir interceptor has been produced at scale and fired in operational environments, giving it a known performance profile against small fast targets.

      While Rafael’s Phase 1 pick does not preclude U S industry competitors from future awards, it brings a potentially faster path to prototype interceptor development and testing. Lockheed Martin and others have disclosed separate efforts to develop IFPC INC 2 compliant interceptors under other agreements.

      Industrial And Supply Chain Considerations

      A key factor in the Army’s assessment is expanding U S production and supply chain options. A Raytheon-Rafael joint venture in the United States is already producing Tamir based missiles and the U S variant known as SkyHunter, which shares lineage with Tamir and is targeted at medium range threats including cruise missiles and rockets.

      (adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

      This presence of domestic missile production can help support scale up if the Army moves ahead with a Tamir derived interceptor for IFPC INC 2, adding resilience to supply and sustainment planning.

      Next Steps And Program Timeline

      Phase 1 selection is focused on early concept development, systems integration checks, and laying groundwork for prototype deliveries. The Army plans further competitive steps to refine requirements and push toward demonstration and potential production decisions later in the decade.

      Further details on schedules and awards have not been publicly released, but IFPC INC 2 remains a priority within Army integrated air and missile defense modernization to address evolving cruise missile threats.

TAGGED:cruise missile defenseIFPC INC 2Iron DomeTamir interceptorUS Army
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • TRML-4D Radar TRML-4D Radar
  • F-47A Fighter Jet F-47A Fighter Jet
  • China DF-61 Missile China DF-61 Missile
  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Jensen Huang’s Nvidia Exit Raises New Questions for U.S.-China AI Competition
  • Jensen Huang Resigns as Nvidia CEO Amid Chip Export Scrutiny
  • Hegseth Highlights B-2 Bomber Strike on Iran as Proof of U.S. Long-Range Strike Power
  • China and US Militaries Hold Crisis Communication Talks in Washington
  • L3Harris Completes FleetLink Communications Testing on U.S. Navy Destroyer

You Might Also Like

best shotgun for home defense
Conventional Weapons & ModernizationMilitary & Ordnance

Best Shotgun for Home Defense: Tactical Comparison of Home Defense Shotguns, Daniel Defense PCCs, and Handguns for Personal Defense

September 7, 2026
U.S. Patriot interceptor stocks
Conventional Weapons & ModernizationMilitary & Ordnance

U.S. Patriot Interceptor Stocks Face Pressure As Iran War Drives Heavy Missile Defense Demand

September 7, 2026
soldier reviews NGSW rifle 2025
Military & OrdnanceSmall Arms & Infantry Weapons

Soldiers Voice Candid Feedback on Army’s NGSW Rifle: Balancing Lethality Gains with Real-World Concerns

September 8, 2026
British Army Titan Trojan upgrade
Conventional Weapons & ModernizationMilitary & Ordnance

UK Approves Upgrade for Titan and Trojan Recovery Vehicles Through 2033

January 12, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?