• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract
Defense ContractsNaval & Maritime

Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: November 5, 2026 12:05 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
3 Min Read
Lockheed Martin Trident II contract
Image : Lockheed Martin
SHARE

Lockheed Martin has received a U.S. Navy contract worth up to $122.45 million to continue development work on the navigation subsystem of the Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missile strategic weapons system.

Contents
Replacing Aging Navigation TechnologyWhy the Navigation Subsystem MattersU.S. and UK Submarine Programs Share the Modernization EffortContract Funding and Industrial DistributionPart of a Wider Trident Modernization Program

The award, announced on November 4, 2026, covers Strategic Weapon System (SWS) Trident Fleet Support and Shipboard System Integration (SSI) Increment 8. It also includes work supporting the United Kingdom through a foreign military sale (FMS).

The contract, numbered N0003027C3015, was awarded to Lockheed Martin’s Rotary and Mission Systems business in Mitchel Field, New York. Work is scheduled to continue through October 31, 2030.

The award covers both cost-plus-incentive-fee and cost-plus-fixed-fee work. Its $122,449,494 value includes optional line items, meaning the full amount is not necessarily guaranteed spending.

- Advertisement -

Replacing Aging Navigation Technology

The most important element of the contract is the modernization of the Trident II navigation subsystem, which provides essential navigation information to the submarine’s strategic weapons system.

The U.S. Navy’s fiscal 2027 budget justification identifies SSI Increment 8 as a replacement effort for the Electrostatic Gyro Navigator (ESGN), a navigation component originally designed and deployed in the early 1980s.

The existing equipment has reached an age where its inertial technology requires modernization. The Navy’s plan includes replacing the navigation equipment, updating associated software and installing replacement Electronic Equipment Consoles.

The modernization also involves changes to supporting systems, including fire control interfaces, navigation training equipment and shipboard data and recording systems.

Importantly, the Navy plans to retain several existing shipboard infrastructure elements, including navigation center bedplates, cabling, ventilation and chilled-water arrangements, and electrical power connections.

This approach allows the Navy to refresh aging navigation technology without requiring a complete replacement of the submarine’s existing shipboard infrastructure.

According to the Department of the Navy’s FY2027 budget documentation, the current ESGN was designed with a 20-year service life. The replacement effort is intended to maintain the operational availability of U.S. and British ballistic missile submarines.

Why the Navigation Subsystem Matters

The Trident II D5 is the central missile system supporting the U.S. Navy’s sea-based nuclear deterrent. Its effectiveness depends on several interconnected subsystems, including navigation, fire control, missile guidance, launch equipment and supporting test systems.

- Advertisement -

The navigation subsystem has a specific role. It supplies the fire control system with information about the submarine’s position, velocity, heading, tilt and time. These inputs help the strategic weapons system establish the conditions required for missile launch.

This distinction matters because the submarine’s navigation equipment and the missile’s onboard guidance system perform different functions. SSI Increment 8 primarily addresses the shipboard navigation architecture. The contract announcement does not identify a new missile, a change to the Trident II’s range or a new nuclear warhead capability.

The modernization is therefore principally a reliability and equipment-obsolescence effort, rather than a new ballistic missile development program.

U.S. and UK Submarine Programs Share the Modernization Effort

The contract also has implications for the United Kingdom’s nuclear deterrent.

The U.S. Navy’s FY2027 budget documentation identifies the Ohio and Vanguard classes, alongside the future Columbia and Dreadnought classes, as beneficiaries of the wider shipboard strategic weapons system modernization effort.

The United States operates the Ohio-class ballistic missile submarine fleet, while the United Kingdom operates Vanguard-class submarines equipped with Trident II D5 missiles.

Both countries are also developing successor submarine classes. The U.S. Columbia-class program is intended to replace the aging Ohio-class fleet, while Britain’s Dreadnought-class program will replace its Vanguard-class submarines.

Maintaining compatible and supportable strategic weapons infrastructure is important to both countries because their sea-based deterrent capabilities depend on the continued availability of the Trident missile system.

The United Kingdom’s inclusion in the latest Lockheed Martin award reflects the shared technical and industrial arrangements supporting the two countries’ strategic deterrent systems. However, the contract announcement does not provide a separate financial breakdown for the British portion of the work.

Contract Funding and Industrial Distribution

The Navy awarded the contract through its Portfolio Acquisition Executive for Strategic Systems Programs in Washington, D.C. The acquisition is being conducted on a sole-source basis under 10 U.S. Code 3204(a)(1) and (4).

The announced work distribution is concentrated in three U.S. locations:

Work locationShare
Mitchel Field, New York77%
Huntington Beach, California20%
Manassas, Virginia2%
Other locations1%

The award includes three categories of fiscal 2027 Navy funding:

  • Operations and maintenance: $3,967,324
  • Other procurement: $12,257,072
  • Shipbuilding and conversion: $12,966,189

These allocations total approximately $29.19 million in initially obligated funding, subject to the applicable funding conditions. The remaining contract value is not equivalent to money immediately obligated.

The award is also subject to the availability of funds under the cited federal acquisition provision. The Navy states that the fiscal 2027 operations and maintenance funding will expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

Part of a Wider Trident Modernization Program

Increment 8 is one component of the Navy’s broader Shipboard System Integration program, which has been addressing aging equipment and obsolescence across the Trident II strategic weapons system.

The Navy’s FY2027 budget describes a wider modernization effort involving fire control, navigation, launcher and shipboard data systems.

It also identifies the Shipboard Systems Modernization Portfolio (SSMP) as the framework for longer-term architectural modernization. Unlike individual SSI increments, which focus on targeted equipment replacements and technology refreshes, the wider portfolio includes work to redesign the shipboard systems architecture.

That distinction is important. Replacing aging navigation equipment addresses an immediate sustainment requirement, while the broader modernization program is intended to improve the ability to adapt the strategic weapons system to future technical and operational requirements.

The latest $122.45 million award provides continued development support for one part of that effort. It does not, by itself, establish the completion of the wider Trident modernization program or a new operational capability for the missile system.

Lockheed Martin’s work is expected to continue until October 2030, with the contract supporting both U.S. strategic submarine operations and the United Kingdom’s related strategic weapons requirements.

TAGGED:Lockheed MartinStrategic Systems ProgramsTrident II D5U.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Lockheed Martin Tests Mk21A Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel ICBM
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract
  • Pentagon Prepares Review of Military Legal System and JAG Corps
  • U.S. and Colombia Launch Southern Vanguard 2027 Exercise
  • CENTCOM Receives 25,000+ Drones and Counter-UAS Systems Under Pentagon Push

You Might Also Like

MK 54 Mod 1 torpedo
Defense Contracts

US Navy Awards $116.6 Million MK 54 Torpedo Contract to General Dynamics

September 9, 2026
RFA Tidespring deployment mission
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

RFA Tidespring Completes Record 291-Day Mission Supporting UK Carrier Strike Group

September 7, 2026
Lockheed Martin Air Commando training
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $24.2M Contract To Sustain Air Commando Training Systems

August 18, 2026
refueling aircraft undergoing testing for secure mission system integration and Navy carrier operations.
Defense ContractsDrones & UAVs

Boeing Awarded $21.6M MQ-25A Contract To Advance Critical Cybersecurity Certification

June 2, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?