• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $88.6 Million Navy Contract for Radiant Mercury Systems
Cyber & Space DefenseDefense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Wins $88.6 Million Navy Contract for Radiant Mercury Systems

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: October 26, 2026 11:17 pm
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
4 Min Read
Lockheed Martin Radiant Mercury contract
Image : U.S. Air Force
SHARE

Lockheed Martin Wins $88.6M Radiant Mercury Contract

Lockheed Martin has received an $88.56 million indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract to produce, install, maintain and modernize Radiant Mercury systems used for secure information exchange across different security domains.

Contents
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $88.6M Radiant Mercury Contract
  • Why the Navy Needs Radiant Mercury
  • What the $88.56 Million Contract Covers
  • A Sole-Source Award Continues Lockheed Martin’s Role
  • Cybersecurity and Operational Information Sharing
  • What Remains Undisclosed

The U.S. Navy has awarded Lockheed Martin Corp.’s Rotary and Mission Systems business an $88,560,319 contract to support Radiant Mercury, a cross-domain information-sharing system used by the Department of Defense and other government agencies.

According to the contract announcement, the award covers the General Service Cross Domain Solution configuration and includes system production, installation, program management, maintenance, modernization, sustainment, security authorization support, logistics and training.

The contract was awarded on Oct. 20, 2026, with a three-year ordering period running through Oct. 19, 2029. Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific in San Diego, California, is the contracting activity under contract number N66001-27-D-0006.

- Advertisement -

The award establishes a maximum contract ceiling of $88.56 million, but it does not mean the government will immediately spend that entire amount. Individual task orders will establish specific requirements, performance periods, locations and funding.

Why the Navy Needs Radiant Mercury

Military operations often require personnel to share information between computer networks operating at different security classification levels. Those networks cannot simply be connected without controls designed to prevent unauthorized disclosure or the introduction of unsafe data.

A cross-domain solution provides a controlled means of transferring information between otherwise separated security environments. It allows authorized information to move between domains while enforcing applicable security policies.

Radiant Mercury is part of the Navy’s established cross-domain security capability. The Navy’s Program Executive Office for Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence identifies Radiant Mercury, also known as RADMERC, as one of its cross-domain solutions for multi-level security and secure information exchange.

The technology supports a practical operational requirement: making relevant information available to authorized users without removing the security boundaries that protect classified networks.

For naval forces, secure information exchange can support coordination between intelligence organizations, operational command centers and other authorized government users. The usefulness of such systems depends not only on their ability to move data, but also on their ability to preserve the controls governing who can access it.

The new contract continues support for this established capability. The announcement does not identify a new system variant, disclose a major technical upgrade or establish a new operational deployment.

What the $88.56 Million Contract Covers

The award combines technical support with the work required to keep deployed systems operating and compatible with evolving government requirements.

- Advertisement -

Its principal activities include:

  • Production and installation: Providing Radiant Mercury General Service systems and installing them where required.
  • Program management: Coordinating contract execution and system support activities.
  • Maintenance and sustainment: Supporting existing systems throughout their operational service.
  • Modernization: Updating systems to meet changing technical and government requirements.
  • Security authorization: Supporting the processes needed to establish and maintain approval for operation within applicable security environments.
  • Logistics and training: Providing supporting services for system users and operators.

The contracting structure is an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity arrangement. This allows the government to order services and deliverables as requirements emerge, rather than committing the full ceiling to a single delivery schedule at the outset.

The contract guarantees a minimum order value of $50,000 and sets a maximum ceiling of $88,560,319. Funding will come from the applicable appropriations of the government activities placing individual orders.

The award announcement does not specify the number of systems to be produced or installed, the distribution of work among government customers, or the amount of funding initially obligated.

Those distinctions matter when assessing the scale of the award. The ceiling indicates the maximum potential value under the contract, not the confirmed cost of a defined quantity of equipment.

A Sole-Source Award Continues Lockheed Martin’s Role

The Navy did not competitively procure the contract. The award cites 10 U.S. Code 3204(a)(1), implemented through Federal Acquisition Regulation 6.302-1, which permits noncompetitive procurement when only one responsible source can meet the government’s requirements under the applicable justification.

This is relevant because Radiant Mercury is an established system with an existing support and modernization requirement. Replacing a fielded cross-domain solution may involve more than acquiring new hardware. The government must also account for software compatibility, security authorization, system integration, testing and the continuity of existing services.

Earlier procurement records provide additional context for Lockheed Martin’s role.

In 2018, the Navy pursued a follow-on sole-source indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract for Radiant Mercury support. The procurement documentation identified the system’s dependence on proprietary software and the incumbent’s ability to meet the government’s established technical and security requirements as factors in the acquisition strategy.

That earlier procurement does not, by itself, establish the specific rationale for every provision of the October 2026 award. The current announcement cites the applicable sole-source authority but does not provide a detailed public explanation of the acquisition decision.

The noncompetitive approach nevertheless illustrates an important issue in military cybersecurity procurement: maintaining an existing accredited system can involve specialized technical dependencies that complicate a change of supplier.

A sole-source contract can preserve continuity, but it also limits direct competition for the work covered by the award. The announcement does not provide enough information to determine whether alternative solutions were evaluated for this particular procurement or whether a competing system could satisfy the same requirements at lower cost.

Cybersecurity and Operational Information Sharing

The contract’s importance extends beyond equipment maintenance. Secure information exchange is a supporting requirement for military command and intelligence operations, particularly when information must pass between organizations that operate under different security restrictions.

The Navy’s historical budget documentation describes Radiant Mercury as a trusted information system designed to support the movement of intelligence and operational data between security enclaves. The documentation also identifies its role in distributing information to operational decision-makers and supporting coordination with authorized coalition partners.

Such capabilities must balance information availability with security enforcement. Allowing too little information to pass can restrict operational awareness, while insufficient controls can expose sensitive data or compromise the integrity of receiving networks.

Maintaining an established cross-domain solution therefore involves ongoing technical and security work, rather than simply keeping computer equipment operational. System changes must remain compatible with applicable authorization requirements and the networks that depend on the solution.

However, the October 2026 award does not disclose specific new security features, software changes, performance improvements or additional deployment locations. It would be premature to describe the contract as introducing a new cybersecurity capability.

What Remains Undisclosed

Several details will be necessary to assess the contract’s eventual operational and financial impact.

The Navy has not specified how many systems will be delivered or modernized, which government organizations will receive the work, or how much funding will be obligated through individual task orders. The announcement also does not identify particular modernization milestones or provide a detailed schedule for system installations.

These omissions are consistent with the structure of an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity contract, under which the government establishes an overall ordering framework and places orders as requirements arise.

The clearest conclusion is that the Navy is continuing its investment in an established secure information-sharing capability. The contract provides a framework for maintaining and updating Radiant Mercury systems over three years, while the actual scope of work and expenditure will depend on subsequent orders.

For Lockheed Martin, the award extends its support role in a specialized area of military information security. For the Navy and other authorized government customers, its practical value will depend on the systems and services delivered, their continued security authorization, and the ability to sustain reliable information exchange across protected networks.

TAGGED:CybersecurityDefense contractsLockheed MartinU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Latest Defense Systems

  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie
  • Northrop YF-23 Fighter Northrop YF-23 Fighter
  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft
  • Rafale F5 Fighter Rafale F5 Fighter
  • Tomahawk Block V Missile Tomahawk Block V Missile
  • Tomahawk Block IV Missile Tomahawk Block IV Missile

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Most Advanced Fighter Jet in the World in 2026: F-22 vs. F-35 vs. J-20
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $88.6 Million Navy Contract for Radiant Mercury Systems
  • Pentagon Uses Department of War Name to Reinforce Message to Adversaries
  • Israel’s Military Chief Reportedly Opposed Pre-Election Strike on Iran
  • Canada Receives First Two F-35 Fighters as Review of 72 Aircraft Continues

You Might Also Like

Raytheon SPY-6 radar contract
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Raytheon Gets $511.5M Navy Contract for SPY-6 Radar Production

October 1, 2026
China Starlink jamming
AI & Electronic WarfareCyber & Space Defense

China Simulates Jamming Starlink in Large-Scale Electronic Warfare Simulation

November 24, 2025
Michigan State University's Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, where a new defense-funded heavy-ion testing beamline will support radiation testing of advanced microelectronics.
Defense Budgets & PolicyDefense Contracts

Department Of War Awards $22.1 Million Contract To Expand Radiation Testing For Defense Microelectronics

September 7, 2026
Perimeter Acquisition Radar Attack Characterization System
Defense Contracts

US Space Force Extends InDyne Inc Contract For PARCS Radar Support At Cavalier Space Force Station

September 13, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?