• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $88.2 Million Navy Submarine Systems Integration Contract
Defense ContractsNaval & MaritimeSubmarines

Lockheed Martin Wins $88.2 Million Navy Submarine Systems Integration Contract

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: November 13, 2026 4:30 am
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
Virginia-class SSN-774 Submarine
SHARE

Lockheed Martin Receives $88.2 Million Navy Submarine Integration Award

Lockheed Martin has received an $88.2 million contract modification from the U.S. Navy to continue systems engineering and integration work supporting the submarine fleet, extending the company’s existing involvement through December 2027.

Contents
Lockheed Martin Receives $88.2 Million Navy Submarine Integration AwardSubmarine C5I integration remains central to the contractFive locations will support the engineering effortFunding combines research and shipbuilding accountsA continuing role in submarine modernization

The November 12, 2026, award is valued at $88,177,120 and was issued to Lockheed Martin Rotary and Mission Systems in Manassas, Virginia. Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA), headquartered in Washington, D.C., is managing the contract.

The modification adds funding to an existing agreement, rather than establishing an entirely new submarine procurement program. Its focus is engineering and integration services for Navy submarines, an area that includes the technical work needed to coordinate complex onboard systems.

Submarine C5I integration remains central to the contract

The award is associated with contract N00024-25-C-6108, originally awarded to Lockheed Martin in December 2024.

- Advertisement -

The original procurement concerned Command, Control, Computers, Communications, Cyber and Intelligence (C5I) systems engineering and integration services for submarine construction and in-service modernization. The Navy’s requirement also covers integration and testing of interconnected submarine combat-system elements.

These services support the integration of equipment and software that allow submarine systems to exchange information and operate together. They are particularly important as the Navy introduces new equipment, updates existing configurations and maintains the technical compatibility of systems across submarine platforms.

The contract is therefore focused on engineering support and systems integration, not the purchase of additional submarines or a separately announced weapons system.

Five locations will support the engineering effort

The Navy has distributed the work across five locations in Virginia, Connecticut and Rhode Island. Manassas will account for the largest share.

Work locationShare
Manassas, Virginia68%
Waterford, Connecticut10%
Groton, Connecticut10%
Middletown, Rhode Island7%
Newport, Rhode Island5%

The geographic distribution reflects the established engineering and support network associated with the submarine integration effort. Manassas will perform most of the work, while the other locations will contribute to the contract’s requirements.

The Navy expects the work to be completed by December 2027.

Funding combines research and shipbuilding accounts

The $88.2 million modification uses a cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-only contract structure. This allows the government to reimburse eligible costs for the contracted engineering effort, with a fixed fee applying to the relevant portion of the work.

The Navy identified three funding sources:

- Advertisement -
Funding accountAmountShare
FY2027 Research, Development, Test and Evaluation$5,224,05840%
FY2025 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy$4,000,00030%
FY2026 Shipbuilding and Conversion, Navy$4,000,00030%
Total identified funding$13,224,058100%

The $13.22 million in identified funding will be obligated at the time of the award. The announcement states that these funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year.

Importantly, the identified obligation is smaller than the $88.18 million modification value. The two figures represent different aspects of the contract and should not be treated as interchangeable.

A continuing role in submarine modernization

Lockheed Martin’s submarine engineering work is part of a longer-running Navy requirement. The underlying contract was initially awarded in December 2024 for $66.48 million, with options that could raise its potential cumulative value to approximately $223.37 million. The original procurement was not competitively awarded under the statutory authority cited by the Navy.

The original requirement covered submarine C5I systems engineering and integration for new construction and in-service modernization. According to the procurement documentation summarized by GovTribe, the work includes system integration, configuration management, performance testing and cybersecurity evaluation.

For the Navy, this engineering support is relevant to maintaining compatibility between submarine combat-system components as equipment and software configurations change. Integration work also helps ensure that modifications can be assessed and tested before they become part of operational submarine configurations.

However, the November 12 announcement does not identify individual submarine classes, specific upgrades, new combat-system capabilities or equipment being installed under this modification. It would therefore be premature to associate the award with a particular submarine class or newly introduced weapon.

The contract provides continued engineering support for the Navy’s submarine systems integration requirements, with performance extending through the end of 2027.

TAGGED:Lockheed MartinNaval SystemssubmarinesU.S. Navy
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • TRML-4D Radar TRML-4D Radar
  • F-47A Fighter Jet F-47A Fighter Jet
  • China DF-61 Missile China DF-61 Missile
  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Lockheed Martin Wins $88.2 Million Navy Submarine Systems Integration Contract
  • U.S. Army Tests Long-Range Maritime Air Assault With Allies in Hawaii
  • Army Sentinel Thomas Iglesias Receives Medal After Enforcing Silence at Tomb of the Unknown Soldier
  • Three Iran-Backed Operatives Indicted Over RAF Fairford Plot
  • Democrats Seek to Remove US-Israel Defense Technology Provisions From FY2027 NDAA

You Might Also Like

Lockheed Martin Texas munitions expansion
Policy & Strategy

Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs

October 15, 2026
F/A-XX fighter cost
Aerospace & AviationFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

F/A-XX Navy Fighter: Boeing Wins Contract as Cost Tops $20 Billion

October 19, 2026
Patriot GEM-T missiles
Defense ContractsMissile Defense Systems

Raytheon Secures Nearly $1 Billion Patriot GEM-T Missile Deal To Strengthen Poland’s Air Defense

September 12, 2026
Hanwha Aerospace credit rating
Asian Defense & SecurityDefense Contracts

Hanwha Aerospace Secures First S&P Global A+ Credit Rating As Defense Exports Drive Record Backlog

September 7, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?