• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Secures $20.7 Million Deal For MK 41 Vertical Launching System Support
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Secures $20.7 Million Deal For MK 41 Vertical Launching System Support

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: August 6, 2026 2:58 am
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
2 Min Read
Lockheed Martin MK 41 contract
SHARE

Executive Summary:

Lockheed Martin Rotary and Mission Systems has received a $20.66 million contract modification from the U.S. Naval Sea Systems Command to continue engineering, technical, and depot support for the MK 41 Vertical Launching System. The work will sustain one of the U.S. Navy’s most widely deployed missile launch systems and is scheduled for completion by December 2026.

Lockheed Martin has received a $20.66 million contract modification to continue supporting the U.S. Navy’s MK 41 Vertical Launching System (VLS), one of the world’s most widely deployed naval missile launch systems. The award was announced by the U.S. Department of Defense, with the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) serving as the contracting authority.

Contents
Contract Covers Engineering, Software, And Depot OperationsWork Will Be Performed Across Multiple U.S. LocationsFunding BreakdownWhy The MK 41 Vertical Launching System MattersSustaining Readiness Is As Important As Buying New WeaponsStrategic Importance For The U.S. Navy

The modification expands work under the previously awarded contract N00024-20-C-5392, covering engineering integration, software support, depot operations, logistics, and technical services necessary to sustain the operational readiness of the MK 41 VLS fleet.

Contract Covers Engineering, Software, And Depot Operations

According to the Department of Defense contract announcement, the award is valued at $20,662,551 and consists of both cost-plus-fixed-fee and cost-only contract elements.

Under the modification, Lockheed Martin will provide:

- Advertisement -
  • Engineering integration
  • Technical support
  • Electronic systems maintenance
  • Computer program support
  • Material procurement
  • Depot-level sustainment
  • Program travel and field support

The work ensures the continued availability and reliability of the electronic systems that control missile launching operations aboard U.S. Navy surface combatants.

Work Will Be Performed Across Multiple U.S. Locations

The contract work will be distributed among several Lockheed Martin and Navy support locations:

LocationShare of Work
Moorestown, New Jersey60%
Ventura, California16%
San Diego, California10%
Seattle, Washington4%
Mayport, Florida4%
Norfolk, Virginia4%
Virginia Beach, Virginia2%

The contract is scheduled for completion by December 2026.

Funding Breakdown

The award combines funding from two defense appropriations.

Funding SourceAmountShare
Fiscal Year 2025 Defense-Wide Funds$8,524,74878%
Fiscal Year 2026 Defense-Wide Research, Development, Test and Evaluation Funds$2,447,08322%

The Department of Defense stated that the obligated funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year, allowing uninterrupted execution of the support effort.

Why The MK 41 Vertical Launching System Matters

The MK 41 Vertical Launching System is among the most important weapons infrastructure components used by the U.S. Navy and allied navies. Rather than being a single weapon, it serves as a modular launch architecture capable of firing numerous missile types from standardized launch cells.

Depending on ship configuration and mission requirements, the system can launch:

  • SM-2 surface-to-air missiles
  • SM-3 ballistic missile interceptors
  • SM-6 multi-mission missiles
  • Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles
  • Vertical Launch Anti-Submarine Rockets (VL-ASROC)
  • Other compatible missile variants

Its modular design enables naval commanders to tailor a ship’s weapons loadout for air defense, ballistic missile defense, anti-submarine warfare, anti-surface warfare, or long-range precision strike missions.

- Advertisement -

Sustaining Readiness Is As Important As Buying New Weapons

Although procurement of new missile systems often attracts attention, sustainment contracts such as this play an equally important role in fleet readiness.

Modern vertical launch systems depend on sophisticated electronics, embedded software, control computers, diagnostics, and communications interfaces. Maintaining these components ensures that missile launch commands execute safely and reliably under demanding operational conditions.

  • Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer

    Arleigh Burke Class Destroyer

    • Displacement: Approx 9,200 tons full load
    • Maximum Speed: 30 plus knots
    • Radar Range: Over 300 km air targets
    • Vertical Launch Cells (VLS): 90 to 96 cells
    • View Details →
    8.0

    Engineering support also helps integrate software updates, cybersecurity improvements, hardware replacements, and compatibility enhancements as new missile variants enter service.

    Without continuous modernization and depot maintenance, even advanced missile inventories would be limited by launcher availability rather than missile stockpiles.

    Strategic Importance For The U.S. Navy

    The award reflects the Navy’s continued investment in sustaining critical combat systems across its surface fleet during a period of heightened maritime competition.

    The MK 41 VLS equips numerous U.S. Navy platforms, including:

    • Arleigh Burke-class guided missile destroyers
    • Ticonderoga-class guided missile cruisers
    • Future surface combatants using compatible launch architectures

    The system is also operated by numerous allied navies, making it one of the most interoperable naval missile launchers in service today. Its compatibility with evolving missile technologies supports integrated air and missile defense missions while enabling rapid adaptation to emerging operational requirements.

    As the Navy expands distributed maritime operations and emphasizes long-range precision strike capabilities, dependable launcher performance remains essential to overall combat effectiveness. Engineering sustainment contracts help ensure these systems remain mission-ready throughout their operational life cycle while reducing maintenance risks and supporting fleet availability.

TAGGED:Lockheed MartinMK 41 Vertical Launching System
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Defense Systems

Latest Defense Systems

  • B61 Nuclear Bomb B61 Nuclear Bomb
  • Japan E-767 Airborne Japan E-767 Airborne
  • Remington 870 Shotgun Remington 870 Shotgun
  • RUTA B1 Cruise Missile RUTA B1 Cruise Missile
  • XQ-67A Drone XQ-67A Drone
  • B-25 Mitchell Bomber B-25 Mitchell Bomber
  • F-100 Super Sabre F-100 Super Sabre
  • North American F-86 Sabre North American F-86 Sabre
  • North American XB-70 Valkyrie North American XB-70 Valkyrie

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • General Atomics to Supply Components for U.S. Army and Navy Hypersonic Weapons
  • Lockheed Martin Tests Mk21A Reentry Vehicle for Sentinel ICBM
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $122.4 Million Trident II Navigation Contract
  • Pentagon Prepares Review of Military Legal System and JAG Corps
  • U.S. and Colombia Launch Southern Vanguard 2027 Exercise

You Might Also Like

F-15 Japan EPAWSS contract
Aerospace & AviationDefense ContractsFighter Jets & Military Aircraft

Boeing Secures $17.6 Million Deal To Upgrade Japan F-15 EPAWSS Training

August 21, 2026
Distributed Common Ground System contract
Defense Contracts

U.S. Air Force Awards $19.1M Contract Modification to GDIT for DCGS Network Weapon System Support

January 31, 2026
UK Ukraine drone deal
Defense ContractsDrones & UAVs

UK Secures Massive Ukraine Drone Deal As British Firms Ramp Up Production Capacity

September 7, 2026
Merkava Power Pack contract
Defense Contracts

US Awards $73.5M Merkava Power Pack Contract To Rolls-Royce Solutions America For Israel

February 17, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?