• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » US Strikes On Iran Intensify Under Operation Epic Fury As Iranian Attacks Decline
Global News

US Strikes On Iran Intensify Under Operation Epic Fury As Iranian Attacks Decline

Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 5:20 pm
Samuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Share
9 Min Read
Operation Epic Fury US strikes
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth speaks during a press briefing on Operation Epic Fury at the Pentagon, March 10, 2026.
SHARE
¦ KEY FACTS AT A GLANCE
  • Operation Epic Fury has entered its second week with expanded US air and maritime strikes inside Iran.
  • US Central Command has struck more than 5,000 targets including missile launchers, drone factories, and naval assets.
  • Iranian ballistic missile attacks have dropped by about 90 percent since the start of the campaign.
  • US forces have destroyed more than 50 Iranian naval vessels and targeted mine laying capabilities in the Persian Gulf.
  • Pentagon officials say the campaign aims to permanently prevent Iran from developing nuclear weapons.

Operation Epic Fury Intensifies As Iranian Responses Slow

Operation Epic Fury continues to expand as the United States intensifies its military strikes against Iran while Iranian missile and drone attacks decline sharply, according to senior Pentagon officials.

Contents
  • Operation Epic Fury Intensifies As Iranian Responses Slow
  • The Big Picture
  • What’s Happening
  • Why It Matters
  • Strategic Implications
  • Competitor View
  • What To Watch Next
  • Capability Gap
  • The Bottom Line

Speaking during a Pentagon briefing, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth said American forces are conducting the largest wave of strikes yet in the campaign, nearly two weeks after the operation began. US military planners report that sustained strikes against Iranian missile systems, naval assets, and drone infrastructure have significantly reduced Tehran’s ability to launch retaliatory attacks.

The campaign, led by US Central Command, targets Iran’s missile stockpiles, naval forces, and defense industrial infrastructure while maintaining pressure on key military facilities across the country.

The Big Picture

The US military campaign against Iran represents one of the most significant Middle East military operations in recent years. Operation Epic Fury began in late February as Washington sought to degrade Iranian missile forces, neutralize maritime threats in the Persian Gulf, and prevent Tehran from advancing toward a nuclear weapons capability.

- Advertisement -

Unlike previous US interventions in the region, the Pentagon describes the operation as a limited but highly focused military campaign designed to eliminate specific strategic threats rather than pursue long term occupation or nation building.

The campaign reflects broader shifts in US defense strategy. American military planning increasingly emphasizes precision strikes, rapid intelligence integration, and coordinated air and maritime operations designed to neutralize enemy capabilities quickly. These methods rely heavily on networked sensors, long range strike aircraft, and sea launched precision weapons.

The operation also underscores the growing role of coalition access and regional partnerships. According to Pentagon officials, several Middle Eastern partners have provided basing access and overflight permissions to support US strike operations.

What’s Happening

Pentagon officials say US Central Command has now struck more than 5,000 targets across Iran since the start of Operation Epic Fury. These targets include missile launch sites, underground storage facilities, drone manufacturing plants, and naval vessels operating in the Persian Gulf.

US Strategic Command bombers have also deployed large precision penetrating weapons against hardened missile facilities buried deep underground. These strikes aim to destroy launch infrastructure that could threaten US forces and regional allies.

Air Force Gen. Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said US forces have made substantial progress against Iran’s naval capabilities as well. American forces have destroyed more than 50 Iranian naval vessels, including a drone carrier ship and several mine laying platforms.

US naval and air assets continue to hunt Iranian vessels capable of mining key shipping lanes in the Persian Gulf.

At the same time, US air defense systems and allied forces have intercepted a growing number of Iranian drones and missiles across the region.

- Advertisement -

Why It Matters

The declining rate of Iranian missile attacks suggests the campaign is successfully targeting Iran’s operational strike network.

According to US military officials, ballistic missile attacks launched from Iran have dropped roughly 90 percent since the beginning of Operation Epic Fury. One way attack drone strikes have also decreased by about 83 percent.

These reductions indicate that US strikes are likely destroying not only missile launchers but also the logistics systems that sustain Iran’s strike capabilities.

Iran’s military strategy has long relied on a layered approach built around ballistic missiles, drones, and naval disruption operations. By targeting these systems simultaneously, US forces are attempting to break the operational link between missile launch sites, production facilities, and command networks.

This approach mirrors recent US operational doctrine that prioritizes early destruction of enemy strike networks in order to protect forward bases and maritime supply routes.

Strategic Implications

The outcome of Operation Epic Fury could reshape regional deterrence dynamics in the Middle East.

Iran has invested heavily in missile forces and naval asymmetric warfare capabilities as a counterweight to the conventional superiority of US and allied militaries. Destroying large portions of that infrastructure could significantly weaken Tehran’s ability to threaten Gulf shipping lanes or regional military bases.

The campaign also highlights the strategic importance of air dominance. Pentagon officials say US forces currently operate with near total air superiority, enabling sustained strikes against Iranian targets while limiting exposure to Iranian defenses.

If these conditions persist, the US military could continue degrading Iran’s defense industrial base and naval forces without committing large ground formations.

Competitor View

Iran and other US strategic competitors will likely interpret the campaign through the lens of modern high intensity warfare.

Tehran has historically relied on proxy groups and irregular tactics to offset conventional weaknesses. However, Pentagon officials say many Iranian proxy organizations have remained largely inactive during the conflict so far.

China and Russia will closely study the campaign’s operational methods. Both countries have invested heavily in missile forces and anti access systems designed to challenge US air power.

The ability of US forces to quickly neutralize missile infrastructure and naval assets may influence how these countries evaluate the survivability of their own military systems in future conflicts.

What To Watch Next

Several developments will determine the next phase of the campaign.

First, US Central Command continues to target Iranian naval assets involved in mine warfare operations in the Persian Gulf. Securing maritime routes through the Strait of Hormuz remains a major operational priority.

Second, continued strikes against Iranian missile infrastructure may further reduce Tehran’s ability to conduct retaliatory attacks.

Finally, political decisions in Washington will determine the overall duration and scope of Operation Epic Fury.

Pentagon officials emphasize that the campaign has clearly defined objectives and is not intended to evolve into a long term occupation.

Capability Gap

Operation Epic Fury targets a specific capability gap that has challenged US forces in the Middle East for decades.

Iran’s large arsenal of ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and drones has long posed a major threat to US bases and allied infrastructure across the region. These weapons allow Tehran to threaten shipping routes and regional energy infrastructure without engaging in direct conventional conflict.

By targeting missile production facilities, launch systems, and drone factories simultaneously, US forces aim to dismantle the operational ecosystem that sustains Iran’s strike capability.

However, limitations remain. Iran retains dispersed missile forces and underground facilities that may survive early strikes. Rebuilding industrial capacity could also occur over time if the conflict ends without long term restrictions.

The Bottom Line

Operation Epic Fury demonstrates how sustained precision strikes can rapidly degrade missile, drone, and naval threats while reshaping regional military deterrence.

TAGGED:Iran conflictMiddle East securitymissile warfareOperation Epic FuryUS Central Command
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
BySamuel Drake | Defense Analyst
Follow:
Samuel Drake is a defense analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering naval warfare, military ordnance, maritime technology, fleet modernization, and defense procurement. His reporting focuses on documented capabilities, procurement programs, and military technology.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft P-51 Mustang Fighter Aircraft
  • Rafale F5 Fighter Rafale F5 Fighter
  • Tomahawk Block V Missile Tomahawk Block V Missile
  • Tomahawk Block IV Missile Tomahawk Block IV Missile
  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • Pratt & Whitney Begins $100 Million Polish Expansion for F-35 Engine Parts
  • Northrop Grumman Wins $43.9 Million Contract for Trident II Rocket Motor Facilities
  • Ukraine Drone Strikes Disrupt Russian Data Centers, Raising Questions About AI Infrastructure Security
  • Lockheed Martin Wins $114.6 Million Contract to Redesign F-35 Navigation Systems
  • Project Agincourt Pushes Pentagon to Speed Up Autonomous Weapons Fielding

You Might Also Like

F-16V Taiwan delivery
Global News

Lockheed Martin Accelerates F-16V Deliveries to Taiwan Amid Rising Strait Tensions

November 3, 2025
Ukraine drones
Global News

Ukraine Seeks More Drones and Better Drone Tactics, National Guard Commander Says

September 8, 2026
British fighter jets Romania deployment
Global News

British Fighter Jets Deploy To Romania For NATO Air Policing Mission

September 7, 2026
AUKUS nuclear submarine sale
Global News

US Lawmakers Flag AUKUS Nuclear Sub Sale Risk Over Australia Taiwan Commitment

September 7, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?