• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Wins $9.58M Navy Contract for LCS and Unmanned Vessel Combat Systems
Naval & MaritimeNaval Strategy & Maritime Security

Lockheed Martin Wins $9.58M Navy Contract for LCS and Unmanned Vessel Combat Systems

Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Last updated: September 7, 2026 11:00 pm
Daniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Share
5 Min Read
Lockheed Martin Navy contract
SHARE

Lockheed Martin Navy Contract Overview

Lockheed Martin has been awarded a $9.58 million U.S. Navy contract modification to support combat system ship integration and testing for littoral combat ships and unmanned surface vessels. The award was announced by the Department of Defense and is managed by Naval Sea Systems Command in Washington, D.C.

Contents
  • Lockheed Martin Navy Contract Overview
  • Scope of Work and Platform Focus
  • Work Locations and Schedule
  • Funding Breakdown and Contract Structure
  • Strategic Context for the U.S. Navy
  • Contracting Authority
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The contract was issued to Lockheed Martin Corp., Rotary and Mission Systems, based in Moorestown, New Jersey. It modifies a previously awarded contract and exercises options related to combat system integration, testing, and support across both crewed and uncrewed naval platforms.

This effort supports ongoing U.S. Navy modernization priorities focused on distributed maritime operations and the integration of unmanned systems into fleet operations.

Scope of Work and Platform Focus

Under the contract modification, Lockheed Martin will perform combat system ship integration and testing activities on two key naval platform types.

- Advertisement -

The first is the U.S. Navy’s littoral combat ship fleet. LCS platforms are designed for operations in near-shore environments and are used for missions such as surface warfare, mine countermeasures, and maritime security.

Lockheed Martin Navy contract
Image Credit: lockheedmartin

The second focus area is unmanned surface vessels. These platforms are increasingly central to Navy plans for expanding maritime awareness, reducing risk to crewed ships, and enabling distributed sensor and weapon networks.

The contract supports system-level integration, testing, and validation activities to ensure combat systems operate effectively across these platforms. While specific systems are not detailed in the award notice, Lockheed Martin is a long-standing provider of naval combat system integration services for surface ships and unmanned platforms.

Work Locations and Schedule

Work under the $9.58 million contract will be performed across multiple U.S. locations, reflecting the distributed nature of naval integration and testing efforts.

The primary work sites include Seattle, Washington, accounting for 45 percent of the effort, and Moorestown, New Jersey, accounting for 32 percent. Additional work will take place in San Diego, California, Camden, New Jersey, Pascagoula, Mississippi, Jacksonville, Florida, Washington, D.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, and Marinette, Wisconsin.

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The contract work is expected to be completed by February 2027, aligning with the Navy’s broader timeline for fielding integrated combat capabilities across crewed and unmanned surface platforms.

Funding Breakdown and Contract Structure

The modification is structured as a cost-plus-incentive-fee and cost-only award. This structure is commonly used for complex integration and testing efforts where technical risk and evolving requirements are present.

At the time of award, $1.5 million in fiscal 2026 other procurement Navy funds will be obligated, representing 88 percent of the total. An additional $195,057 from fiscal 2025 other procurement Navy funds, representing 12 percent, will also be obligated.

- Advertisement -

The Department of Defense noted that these funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year, providing funding stability across the contract performance period.

Strategic Context for the U.S. Navy

This Lockheed Martin Navy contract supports the service’s push to integrate unmanned surface vessels alongside traditional warships. The Navy has identified unmanned systems as critical enablers for future maritime operations, particularly in contested environments.

Combat system integration and testing are essential steps in ensuring that sensors, command systems, and mission software can operate reliably across mixed fleets of crewed and uncrewed vessels.

Lockheed Martin’s Rotary and Mission Systems business unit has a long history of supporting naval combat systems, making it a key industry partner for these efforts.

Contracting Authority

Naval Sea Systems Command, headquartered in Washington, D.C., is the contracting activity for the award. NAVSEA oversees the design, construction, maintenance, and modernization of U.S. Navy ships and systems, and plays a central role in surface fleet integration efforts.

TAGGED:Littoral Combat ShipLockheed MartinNaval ModernizationU.S. Navy contractsUnmanned Surface Vessels
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByDaniel Mercer / Defense & Aerospace Analyst
Follow:
Daniel Mercer is a defense and aerospace analyst at TheDefenseWatch.com covering military aviation, aerospace technology, unmanned systems, air warfare, and defense procurement. His reporting uses official documents, government and military statements, company announcements, and other public sources.
Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Latest Defense Systems

  • Tomahawk Block V Missile Tomahawk Block V Missile
  • Tomahawk Block IV Missile Tomahawk Block IV Missile
  • SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter SU-57 Felon Stealth Fighter
  • Boeing F/A-XX Fighter Boeing F/A-XX Fighter
  • JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet
  • Gaurav Glide Bomb Gaurav Glide Bomb
  • F-47 Fighter Jet F-47 Fighter Jet
  • Spirit UAS Spirit UAS
  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb

Recent Compares

  • J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? J-10C vs JF-17 Thunder: Which Fighter Is More Capable? View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • P-800 Oniks Missile: Range, Speed and BrahMos Comparison
  • Ukrainian Drone Unit Caused 70% of Simulated U.S. Brigade Casualties in Germany Exercise
  • OCCAR Marks 25 Years of European Defense Cooperation With 28 Programs
  • Saab Q3 2026 Results Show 30.6% Organic Sales Growth as Orders Surge
  • How Much Does a Tomahawk Missile Cost? Price, Range and Blocks

You Might Also Like

Liberty Class autonomous ship
Global News

Blue Water Autonomy Unveils Liberty Class 190-Foot Autonomous Vessel For U.S. Navy

February 11, 2026
Fleet Ballistic Missile program history
Naval & MaritimeSubmarines

Lockheed Martin’s Fleet Ballistic Missile Program Marks 70 Years of U.S. Nuclear Deterrence at Sea

September 8, 2026
Lockheed PAC-3 ACE
Military & OrdnanceMissile Defense Systems

Lockheed Martin Races To Deploy Lower Cost Patriot Interceptor Amid Soaring Global Air Defense Demand

September 7, 2026
France Rubis submarine
Naval & MaritimeSubmarines

France Moves Fifth Suffren-Class Attack Submarine Rubis Toward Launch

October 18, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?