• Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools
TheDefenseWatch.com
  • Aerospace & Aviation
  • Military & Ordnance
  • Naval & Maritime
  • Cyber & Space Defense
  • Policy & Strategy
  • Global News
  • Tools Library
    • Smart Calculator
    • Drone Flight Time Calculator
    • Drone Range Calculator
    • Counter-Drone Jammer Effective Range Calculator
    • Counter-Battery Radar Detection Calculator
    • Artillery Fire Correction Calculator
    • Thermal Camera Detection Range Calculator
    • Missile Range & Time-of-Flight Calculator
    • Radar Detection Range Calculator
    • FPV Strike Drone Payload vs Range Calculator
    • Loitering Munition Endurance Calculator
    • Sniper Ballistic Drop & Windage Calculator
    • Bullet Drop Calculator
    • U.S. Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Military Retirement Calculator
    • Military Pension Calculator
    • Large Number Calculator
Font ResizerAa

TheDefenseWatch.com

The Defense Watch | U.S. & Global Defense News, Analysis & Military Updates

Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Defense Systems
  • Manufacturer
  • Comparisons
  • Compare 
  • Tools

Stay Updated

Get the latest update

Subscribe

Explore

  • Drone
  • Fighter Jets & Military Aircraft
  • Hypersonic Weapons
  • Aircraft Carriers
  • Strategic History & Missions
  • Tools Library
Home » Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs
Policy & Strategy

Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs

Michael Anderson | Historical Operations & Military Affairs Writer
Last updated: October 15, 2026 4:34 am
Michael Anderson | Historical Operations & Military Affairs Writer
Share
8 Min Read
Lockheed Martin Texas munitions expansion
Lockheed-Martin-1 Lockheed Martin celebrated a ribbon cutting for a nearly 200,000-square-foot expansion of a new advanced manufacturing facility that will expand the company‘s manufacturing footprint in Grand Prairie, Texas, to more than 735,000 square feet. (Image : Lockheed Martin )
SHARE

Lockheed Martin plans to invest $300 million to expand its advanced munitions manufacturing operation in Grand Prairie, Texas, as the U.S. defense industry faces growing pressure to increase weapons production and replenish military inventories.

Contents
  • Grand Prairie facility expands to more than 735,000 square feet
  • Hadrian partnership brings automated machining into the factory
  • Why missile production capacity matters
  • Jobs and industrial capacity are separate measures of progress

The company announced the expansion on October 14, 2026, alongside plans to create 6,000 jobs across the United States, including 2,000 in Texas. The project combines additional manufacturing space with a new automated machining operation developed through a partnership with industrial manufacturing company Hadrian.

The investment is part of Lockheed Martin’s wider plan to commit $8 billion to $9 billion through 2030 to expand or modernize more than 20 U.S. facilities involved in munitions production. The company has not disclosed a complete breakdown of the planned jobs by location or a detailed schedule for filling all positions.

Grand Prairie facility expands to more than 735,000 square feet

The expansion will increase Lockheed Martin’s manufacturing footprint in Grand Prairie to more than 735,000 square feet. According to the company, the project includes 100,000 square feet of new space and the conversion of 85,000 square feet of office space into advanced manufacturing areas.

- Advertisement -

The facility supports Lockheed Martin’s Missiles and Fire Control business, which produces components for several U.S. missile and precision-strike programs.

These include the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 Missile Segment Enhancement (PAC-3 MSE), Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD), Precision Strike Missile (PrSM) and Joint Advanced Tactical Missile (JATM). The company said the expanded operation will supply components to final-assembly facilities in Camden, Arkansas, and Troy, Alabama.

The announcement also provides a snapshot of the facility’s existing production base. Lockheed Martin said nearly 800 production employees work at the site, which manufactured 250,000 parts in 2025. More than 30 additional high-precision machines have already been installed in recent months, and the company expects to add nearly 100 new advanced machines across the facility by the end of 2026.

Those figures describe manufacturing activity and installed equipment, rather than finished missile output. The company has not published a corresponding production target for completed weapons attributable specifically to the Grand Prairie expansion.

Hadrian partnership brings automated machining into the factory

A central part of the project is a 24-machine automated machining cell that Hadrian is expected to bring into the Grand Prairie facility. Lockheed Martin said the cell is scheduled to become operational in early 2027 and will be operated by Lockheed Martin’s own production workforce.

Lockheed Martin Texas munitions expansion
Lockheed-Martin-Hadrian
Hadrian will bring innovative, highly automated machining cells to the Grand Prairie facility, operated by the world-class Lockheed Martin production workforce. (Image : Lockheed Martin )

The arrangement brings manufacturing automation, production software and precision-machining processes into an established defense production environment. Rather than relying exclusively on conventional factory expansion, the companies are combining new equipment and commercial manufacturing methods with Lockheed Martin’s existing program and quality-control processes.

The partnership follows a seven-year agreement signed by the companies in 2025, according to Lockheed Martin’s announcement. It also follows the defense contractor’s separate collaboration with GM Defense to apply automotive manufacturing capabilities to defense production.

The practical objective is to increase the availability of machined components needed by downstream assembly operations. However, automation alone does not determine how quickly a finished missile can be delivered. Electronics, propulsion components, specialized materials, testing, supplier availability and government acceptance requirements can also affect production schedules.

- Advertisement -

Lockheed Martin has not quantified how much the Hadrian cell will increase component output, reduce manufacturing time or lower unit costs. Those measures will be important in assessing the partnership’s eventual results.

Why missile production capacity matters

For the U.S. military, expanding production capacity is a different challenge from developing a new weapon. A missile may already be operational and supported by established procurement contracts, yet manufacturers still need sufficient factory space, skilled workers, specialized equipment and reliable suppliers to deliver it at the required rate.

That distinction matters for systems such as PAC-3 MSE and THAAD, which support U.S. and allied air and missile defense. PrSM provides a precision-strike capability for land forces, while JATM is intended to strengthen U.S. tactical air-to-air weapon capabilities.

Increasing the supply of components can help reduce manufacturing bottlenecks, particularly when multiple programs compete for machining capacity and skilled labor. But the Grand Prairie investment is one part of a larger production network, not a standalone solution to every constraint affecting missile deliveries.

Lockheed Martin said its broader $8 billion to $9 billion investment commitment through 2030 will cover expansion and modernization at more than 20 facilities. The company has also announced initiatives intended to accelerate PAC-3 MSE component manufacturing through cooperation with GM Defense.

These efforts indicate a focus on scaling established weapon programs alongside ongoing development work. For the Pentagon, the benefit will depend on whether additional factory capacity translates into higher deliveries on schedules aligned with military requirements.

Jobs and industrial capacity are separate measures of progress

Lockheed Martin’s plan to create 6,000 U.S. jobs is a substantial workforce target, but it should not be treated as a direct measure of additional missile production.

The company has identified 2,000 of those jobs as being in Texas. It has not provided a complete allocation of the remaining positions across its other facilities, nor has it specified how many jobs will be new production roles, engineering positions, support functions or other specialties.

The workforce expansion also creates a training requirement. Precision machining for defense components involves demanding production tolerances, process documentation and quality assurance. Bringing new employees and automated equipment into service requires training and validation before the additional capacity can consistently support deliveries.

For Grand Prairie, the immediate milestones are more tangible: completing the facility expansion, installing the planned machinery and bringing the Hadrian cell online in early 2027. The longer-term test will be whether these investments lead to measurable gains in component throughput and more predictable deliveries to missile assembly facilities.

Lockheed Martin’s announcement establishes its investment and employment plans, but it does not yet demonstrate the resulting increase in finished missile production. That distinction will remain important as the company expands its U.S. munitions manufacturing network.

TAGGED:Defense Industrial BaseLockheed Martinmissile productionTexas
Share This Article
Facebook Copy Link Print
ByMichael Anderson | Historical Operations & Military Affairs Writer
Follow:
Michael Anderson is a defense writer and military affairs contributor at TheDefenseWatch.com. He covers military strategy, special operations, modern warfare, defense technology, and international security developments.

Latest Defense Systems

  • GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb GBU-43/B MOAB Bomb
  • John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier John F. Kennedy Aircraft Carrier
  • Voyager Tanker Voyager Tanker
  • YU-20 Tanker YU-20 Tanker
  • China KJ-500 Aircraft China KJ-500 Aircraft
  • SPY-6 Radar SPY-6 Radar
  • Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft Boeing VC-25B Presidential Aircraft
  • SM-3 Block IB Missile SM-3 Block IB Missile
  • USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier USS Abraham Lincoln Aircraft Carrier

Recent Compares

  • Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities Tejas vs Gripen: Key Differences and Capabilities View Comparison →
  • Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter Tejas vs MiG-21 Bison: How India Replaced Its Iconic Supersonic Fighter View Comparison →
  • F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles F-35 vs F-16: Stealth, Sensors and Combat Roles View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared Tejas Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon: Capability Compared View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-16 Fighting Falcon : Which Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared Su-57 Fighter Jet vs J-20 Fighter Jet: Stealth and Air Combat Compared View Comparison →
  • Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization Mirage 2000 vs Tejas Mk1A: Legacy Combat Power vs Indigenous Modernization View Comparison →
  • Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? Rafale Fighter Jet vs F-22 Raptor: Which Air Dominance Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →
  • Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft Tejas Fighter Jet vs. Rafale Fighter Jet: India’s Indigenous Fighter Meets France’s Proven Multirole Combat Aircraft View Comparison →
  • F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? F-22 Raptor vs. F-35 Joint Strike Fighter: Which Fifth Generation Fighter Has the Edge? View Comparison →

Recent Posts

  • US Military Weighs MOAB for Potential Future Strikes on Iran, CNN Reports
  • Saab Wins $120 Million Order for New Gripen Flight Control Computer
  • L3Harris Delivers First VAMPIRE Counter-Drone Systems to U.S. Army
  • Lockheed Martin Invests $300 Million in Texas Munitions Expansion, Plans 6,000 U.S. Jobs
  • Lockheed Martin Taps Avio for ER GMLRS and PrSM Rocket Motor Production

You Might Also Like

Second Venezuela strike threat
Alliances & DoctrinesPolicy & Strategy

Trump Warns Second Venezuela Strike If Government Does Not Cooperate

January 4, 2026
Iran strike legality debate
Defense Budgets & PolicyPolicy & Strategy

Iran Strike Legality Questioned As U.S. Lawmakers Clash Over Congressional Notification

March 3, 2026
Operation Mount Hope III
Policy & StrategyStrategic History & Missions

Operation Mount Hope III: How Two Night Stalker Chinooks Carried a Libyan Hind Out of Chad

October 3, 2026
F-35 contract modification
Defense Contracts

Lockheed Martin Awarded $700 Million F-35 Contract Modification To Support Denmark And Global Partners

September 7, 2026

Logo

Copyright © 2026 TheDefenseWatch.com

Helpful Links

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use / Disclaimer
  • U.S. Privacy Notice – CCPA Compliance

Defense Systems

  • Defense Systems
  • Comparisons 
  • Manufacturer
  • Tactical Calculators

Popuplar

Which 5 Air Forces Possess the Costliest Fighter Jet Fleets in the World
Evolving Strategic Value: Carrier Strike Groups in the Indo-Pacific’s Future Security Architecture
Autonomous Weapon Systems Spark U.S. Ethics Debate Amid Rapid Military AI Integration

We report on developments involving military forces, governments, defense companies, research organizations, and security institutions around the world. 

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Username or Email Address
Password

Lost your password?